View Single Post
  #4  
Old 06-24-2010, 05:04 PM
Trucidation
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Guess what, people bitched about the voices in SW2 so they left them out. You get what you pay for.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Palandiell View Post
first, they put out a game that gets heavily critized for absolutly NO innotiative ideas or even changes and an archaic graphic, and then they dont even TRY to make the english version good?
So you bought into the mainstream review kool aid, huh. As long as those crap EA games keep gettings 8s and 9s I'd trust them about as far as I could throw a dead body. Show me any other space sim which gives you a team of pilots. Who each have personalised skill trees. That's just to name one thing. Multiple storylines, multiple endings. "Archaic graphics"? Well, graphics whores are everywhere nowadays I suppose. Sure, space is rather empty and the engine doesn't seem optimised to handle large fleets (see modding thread), but here I was thinking "archaic" meant stuff like those good ol' NES games I used to enjoy. I'd rather have SW's gameplay rather than the tedious fps-like space sims like Darkstar One or Spaceforce: Rogue Universe, even if they look a bit nicer. But who cares if the game sucks, look at the detail on those laser guns, right?

Last edited by Trucidation; 06-25-2010 at 02:04 AM.
Reply With Quote