Thread: Banning Planes
View Single Post
  #17  
Old 09-27-2009, 03:23 AM
Pubestien13 Pubestien13 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The U.S. of F@#$ing A. America thats where!!! Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 18
Default Point still stands

Regardless of their history and any other point made, mine still stands. They made these planes have advantages in every aspect of a fighter accept armament (when compared to that of other planes) in arcade mode. Yes, it's almost futile to get into turning fight, but it takes what seems like an ungodly amount of time to take them out when using hit and run tactics. And in realistic mode im sure they're alot more vulnerable. You can't tell that they're not unfair in arcade mode when they neglegted to transfer real agility attributes from the Spitfire's perfectly (in all modes) when FW 190's and P-51D's can't fly worth anything more than WW1 biplanes. And from personal experiance they aren't very easy to shoot down; they're small and tritchy, therfore making them a hard target. The only WW2 modern planes that have an arguably easy time shooting them down are are those with multiple cannons or multiple heavy cannons (Bf-109's, FW190 D-9, Spitfire's, ect.). I've seen a decent amount of player abuse this plane to what seems like an F-22 vs. anything. To sum it up, they're unfair in arcade, plain and simple. Don't try argueing that they're not.
Reply With Quote