Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 11-12-2015, 12:58 PM
gaunt1 gaunt1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: India
Posts: 314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pursuivant View Post
* If anyone feels inspired to model the He-111H-22, air-launched V-1 should be a potential loadout!
Yt2 already did it: http://www.sas1946.com/main/index.ph...c,31076.0.html

But a normal H-11 or H-16 would be far more important than this exotic, limited production run aircraft.
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 11-12-2015, 02:25 PM
Tolwyn Tolwyn is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 250
Default

Good point. I stand corrected.

Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 11-14-2015, 03:45 AM
P-38L P-38L is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Medellín, Colombia
Posts: 117
Default To give credit

Hello TD
First of all thank you for your great job about updating the best flight simulator of all times.

I have a little request: the name of this flight simulator is IL-2 Sturmovik. It is based on a beautiful airplane named Ilyushin IL-2 Sturmovik; so why not to improve the shape on the airplane, add open canopy and add animation to the pilot when see it from out side (when moving the stick) and perhaps a moving trims, just to give a big thank you to the airplane.

Now I have a question: the IL-2, 1941 field mod. airplane has pilot and gunner, but this is the only version of the airplane that doesn't have the option to jump to the gunner position, I wonder why.

Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 11-14-2015, 07:41 AM
Sita Sita is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 943
Default

because at that time no one don't know how it looks that improvised gunner cockpit ...

just from the side look i can assume that gunner have coupled turret with DA MG ...
looks like Tur-6 turret ... but i'm not sure in that ..
__________________
work hard, fly fast

Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 11-14-2015, 08:11 AM
Furio's Avatar
Furio Furio is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 299
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sita View Post
because at that time no one don't know how it looks that improvised gunner cockpit ...

just from the side look i can assume that gunner have coupled turret with DA MG ...
looks like Tur-6 turret ... but i'm not sure in that ..

And, probably, not two field mods were exactly alike.
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 11-15-2015, 10:52 PM
dimlee's Avatar
dimlee dimlee is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Europe
Posts: 312
Default UV illumination

Reasonable suggestion from the old thread. To introduce more realistic night illumination of the cockpit. For example, UV light where it is historically applicable.
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=16658
__________________
Q: Mr. Rall, what was the best tactic against the P-47?
A: Against the P-47? Shoot him down!
(Gunther Rall's lecture. June 2003, Finland)
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 11-16-2015, 06:06 AM
Sita Sita is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 943
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dimlee View Post
Reasonable suggestion from the old thread. To introduce more realistic night illumination of the cockpit. For example, UV light where it is historically applicable.
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=16658


yes we know about that ... and working in that dirrection ... but its quite difficult ...

because in il2 we have just one lighting system ... but in reality its three or in some cases more variant of lighting ...

for example - if we will do in pit UV light plus standart lamps .... it well be look strange ...



it's pit of old plane in which used standart lamp lights ...
__________________
work hard, fly fast

Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 11-16-2015, 06:08 AM
Sita Sita is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 943
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sita View Post

for example - if we will do in pit UV light plus standart lamps .... it well be look strange ...
i mean if you by pressing cockpit light key will get UV and lamp light at same time ...
__________________
work hard, fly fast

Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 11-16-2015, 08:48 PM
Tolwyn Tolwyn is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 250
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sita View Post
i mean if you by pressing cockpit light key will get UV and lamp light at same time ...
One of my long-standing complaints is the way DT has "made things darker" is too dark.

Everytime I see a "night mission" it's an instant no thank you.

Dark is TOO dark. Doesn't address the human eye conditioning to night (cones and rods).

It's like you've taken a black sheet and simply modified its opacity.

The original IL2 night time is more realistic given the science of human sight at night that what DT has currently done.
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 11-17-2015, 09:46 AM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tolwyn View Post
One of my long-standing complaints is the way DT has "made things darker" is too dark.
For many missions, I think you're right.

On the other hand, us folks living in areas of significant light pollution forget just how dark the night can be.

Realistically, if you're flying at midnight, in January, under a thick overcast, on a moonless night, over the blacked out skies of London, Berlin, Moscow or Helsinki, the sky is going to be pitch black.

In the summer, the night will look a bit more like the current IL2 default.

Under a full moon on a clear night during the summer, there should be a bit more light than IL2 currently allows.

IL2's night sky graphic could also be more realistic - with far more stars in the sky (even if they're not realistically modeled). Under really dark, moonless skies, clouds above you should appear as black silhouettes, and there should be enough visible stars that you should be able to detect nearby aircraft above you because they're silhouetted against the stars.

As to human vision, IL2 doesn't model the effects of dazzling and loss of night vision which occur when someone is exposed to very bright lights at night. Furthermore, it doesn't realistically model the loss of color vision that humans experience at night (we lose more of our ability to see colors at bottom of the color scale - red, yellow and orange), and our loss of ability to track moving objects in dim light.

IL2 also doesn't model the effects of high altitude and injury on night vision acuity. The eye is an oxygen-hungry organ, and when oxygen is in short supply, it's one of the first organs to be shut down. Even mild hypoxia can play hell with your night vision.

The simplest method of modeling the night sky might be to give mission builders or players some control over how dark the world is, and how much sunlight appears over the horizon.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.