Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 10-18-2011, 08:54 PM
Sternjaeger II Sternjaeger II is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamNotDavid View Post
What the F do you think the x-rays were off? They were from his dentist. They were compared with the teeth the Russians had.
Even if this actually matches, you can appreciate that Russian intelligence could produce such evidence, don't you think? They needed him dead, or at least they needed some sort of evidence.


Quote:
Does he explain how 20+ people would go to their graves lying for Hitler even as his closest supporters stab him in the back? If not, there is no point in listening to him. And I'm not the one going LALALALALALALA here.



Don't know and don't care. If you don't have a plausible explanation why everyone is lying for Hitler, your story is a fraud. That's why Himmler and Goering are such a big problem for you. They were his closest supporters, and they both stabbed him in the back. Do you really think that low level minions would have acted any differently?



See above about no plausible justification for lying.



See about about no plausible justification for lying.

The main problem for this idiocy is that you can't justify how everyone would lie for Hitler when all their incentive is to stab him in the back (see Himmler et al). Not only is it implausible that everyone he left behind would lie for him, it's idiotic.
I really think you fail to comprehend the fanatism around Hitler's persona. Kids and old men were fighting a lost battle to defend Berlin, they could have surrendered, but they didn't. The only one in the high ranks that had this fanatic view of Hitler was probably Goebbels, the rest of the big wigs were just trying to save their asses or pursuing their plans: Himmler was a cunning bastard who was running his personal agenda, Doenitz had already found an agreement with the Allies, Goering was an utter imbecile, but he surely didn't love his Fuhrer more than he loved himself..

For a better understanding of German fanatism for Hitler read "History of the Third Reich" by your compatriot William L. Shirer, he really managed to give an accurate portrayal of Germany as seen with the eyes of a foreigner.

Last edited by Sternjaeger II; 10-18-2011 at 08:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 10-18-2011, 08:55 PM
Sternjaeger II Sternjaeger II is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamNotDavid View Post
All we seem to have proved here is that you don't know what a non sequitur is.
that's the answer I would expect by someone who believes that Oswald was indeed the killer of JFK. Otherwise a simple "no, I'm not an idiot, thank you" would have sufficed.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 10-18-2011, 08:58 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldschool61 View Post
None of what you are stating is true. Perhaps you can site your sources for your claims.
Just because you are not aware of the facts does not make them un-true
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 10-18-2011, 09:02 PM
IamNotDavid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II View Post
I really think you fail to comprehend the fanatism around Hitler's persona.
No, I comprehend it completely. At the end of the war his closest supporters stabbed him in the back. What part of that are you not understanding? These people didn't fight fanatically to the end, they tried to save their own backsides. The people in the bunker weren't fighting fanatically, they were hiding. If one of then could have got better treatment for turning on Hitler they would have done so in a heartbeat. The idea that they all conspired to lie to help Hitler abandon them is one of the most idiotic things I have ever heard. It's almost as bad as the fake Moon landing morons.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 10-18-2011, 09:02 PM
Sternjaeger II Sternjaeger II is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Just because you are not aware of the facts does not make them un-true
he has a point though: can you cite your references?
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 10-18-2011, 09:03 PM
IamNotDavid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II View Post
that's the answer I would expect by someone who believes that Oswald was indeed the killer of JFK. Otherwise a simple "no, I'm not an idiot, thank you" would have sufficed.
Google "Non sequitur". Seriously. You look like a fool.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 10-18-2011, 09:06 PM
Sternjaeger II Sternjaeger II is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamNotDavid View Post
No, I comprehend it completely. At the end of the war his closest supporters stabbed him in the back. What part of that are you not understanding? These people didn't fight fanatically to the end, they tried to save their own backsides. The people in the bunker weren't fighting fanatically, they were hiding. If one of then could have got better treatment for turning on Hitler they would have done so in a heartbeat. The idea that they all conspired to lie to help Hitler abandon them is one of the most idiotic things I have ever heard. It's almost as bad as the fake Moon landing morons.
I'm afraid we're already running around in circles here. Before giving any absolute statement like yours I would at least take into account other people's points of view and evidences, then form my own opinion. I don't think you have any intention to do it, because you already know the truth.

I think you made your point, you can now move on to the next thread.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 10-18-2011, 09:08 PM
Sternjaeger II Sternjaeger II is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamNotDavid View Post
Google "Non sequitur". Seriously. You look like a fool.
..you're doing it again Hayward, you really need to calm down man.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 10-18-2011, 09:09 PM
IamNotDavid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II View Post
I'm afraid we're already running around in circles here. Before giving any absolute statement like yours I would at least take into account other people's points of view and evidences, then form my own opinion. I don't think you have any intention to do it, because you already know the truth.

I think you made your point, you can now move on to the next thread.
No, I really don't have to consider the views of conspiracy nutcases who can't possibly explain away massive holes in their crazy plots. In fact, I rather enjoy mocking them.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 10-18-2011, 09:10 PM
IamNotDavid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II View Post
..you're doing it again Hayward, you really need to calm down man.
Google is your friend. Use it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.