Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 01-18-2012, 02:38 PM
Mustang Mustang is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 106
Default

MW50 - Water / Metanol tank
erhöhte Notleistung boost - spray gasoline into the supercharger.

FW 190
A4
A5
A6
A7

Dont use MW50 is OK

But about erhöhte Notleistung boost...

Last edited by Mustang; 01-18-2012 at 02:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 01-18-2012, 02:44 PM
_1SMV_Gitano _1SMV_Gitano is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 217
Default

AFAIK Erhöhte Notleistung was used on the A-8 and A-9(?), but not in earlier fighter subvariants.

Low altitude C3 boost was used only on some fighter-bomber variants...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 01-18-2012, 08:01 PM
kennel kennel is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 90
Default

So there is some incorrect infomation in our airplane books? I have encyclopedia of WWII planes stating 190A4 had mw50 boost?
Also states that LA5 1942 engine had a carbareta instead of direct fuel injection, dunno if it suffered from -ve g cut out though.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 01-18-2012, 09:34 PM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kennel View Post
So there is some incorrect infomation in our airplane books? I have encyclopedia of WWII planes stating 190A4 had mw50 boost?
Also states that LA5 1942 engine had a carbareta instead of direct fuel injection, dunno if it suffered from -ve g cut out though.
The FW190A-4 was, to the best of my understanding, the first model of FW190 equipped that would be able to take advantage of MW50 boost. But that feature was never used operationally until much later and certainly not in the earlier A-4/5/6.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 01-18-2012, 10:09 PM
kennel kennel is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 90
Default

Thanks for clearing that up, there is alot of info & its difficult to find out real world performance.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 01-18-2012, 10:21 PM
II/JG54_Emil II/JG54_Emil is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kennel View Post
So there is some incorrect infomation in our airplane books? I have encyclopedia of WWII planes stating 190A4 had mw50 boost?
Also states that LA5 1942 engine had a carbareta instead of direct fuel injection, dunno if it suffered from -ve g cut out though.
I second that
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 01-18-2012, 10:24 PM
Mustang Mustang is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 106
Default

Sorry, A5 / A6 had "boost" - improving at any height IMHO.

FW 190 A5 - 10-7-1942





ZOOM






FW 190 A5/A6







Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 01-19-2012, 01:27 AM
Jumoschwanz Jumoschwanz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 282
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schnorchel View Post
with such change(top speed has 30-40km/h decreasing at altitude regarding to compare data), LW cannnot fly on east front after 1943 anymore. no chance to deel with Las, yaks from altiude to bottom. at beginning bf109, now Fw190.
This is not true. The 4.11 190A8 and 190D9 are just as fast or faster than the La7 at 5000 meters altitude and only 10km/hr slower at sea level. The Yak3 is 30km/hr slower than either at those altitudes and the 1944 109s are all faster than the Yak3 and the La7.

The first 4.11 plane I flew online was the FW190A8 and I did not have any problems landing it, it is much easier to land now than it was when Forgotten Battles first came out nine years ago!

The only thing I thought was sort of odd was that the 44' 190D9 does not seem to be faster than the A8 at 5000 meters where I thought that at high altitude it was supposed to be a little bit faster. But I am not a history major or the best test pilot out there.....
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 01-19-2012, 02:14 AM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jumoschwanz View Post
This is not true. The 4.11 190A8 and 190D9 are just as fast or faster than the La7 at 5000 meters altitude and only 10km/hr slower at sea level. The Yak3 is 30km/hr slower than either at those altitudes and the 1944 109s are all faster than the Yak3 and the La7.

The first 4.11 plane I flew online was the FW190A8 and I did not have any problems landing it, it is much easier to land now than it was when Forgotten Battles first came out nine years ago!

The only thing I thought was sort of odd was that the 44' 190D9 does not seem to be faster than the A8 at 5000 meters where I thought that at high altitude it was supposed to be a little bit faster. But I am not a history major or the best test pilot out there.....
You didn't have trouble getting it to slow down? I've been using my tried and tested FW190 landing techniques that I've relied on for years and I do find it is now rather difficult to get it under 300kph on my final approach. I'll have to adjust a bit... but it does seem a bit... extreme? I honestly hadn't noticed until someone pointed it out so I may be extra sensitive.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 01-19-2012, 02:33 AM
AndyJWest AndyJWest is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,049
Default

The Fw 190 does seem reluctant to lose speed, but I've always slowed to about 230 kmh or so before dropping the gear and flaps anyway - a curved approach help a lot with visibility too.
__________________
MoBo: Asus Sabertooth X58. CPU: Intel i7 950 Quad Core 3.06Ghz overclocked to 3.80Ghz. RAM: 12 GB Corsair DDR3 (1600).
GPU: XFX 6970 2GB. PSU: 1000W Corsair. SSD: 128 GB. HDD:1 TB SATA 2.
OS: Win 7 Home Premium 64bit. Case: Antec Three Hundred. Monitor: 24" Samsung.
Head tracking: TrackIR 5. Sore neck: See previous.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.