![]() |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
One point that I really don't understand is why people don't go to FMB and just test things... I'm saying since a long time ago that this sim engine is really cool... But people now are asking if windsocks works in CloD? Yes, at least the windsock strong works ok, animated, pointing the direction and strenght of winds... But it's a Windsock STRONG (really strong in CloD, ACE maybe can tweak the "WM" of this object someday), so, it will always "pointing to the grass" if you aren't in the middle of a hurricane... http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=23586 And for the other guy, I posted a video showing tha plane turning until face the wind... Really, I don't know what people want sometimes... Strange! Last edited by LoBiSoMeM; 09-06-2011 at 01:26 AM. |
#52
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hey Ned
No it is not the torque.. because the Spit will sit and spin with the engine off.. Not on all maps.. but some.
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
By the way... 60Km/h winds + windsocks + smoke in bugged CloD... We reach the point when WIND is a bug! Thanks God we don't have dynamic weather yeat... |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The 109 in the same mission pretty much didn't spin, so maybe it's just something with the british fighters that need to be ironed out. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I give up... remove the wind of the sim, please.
|
#56
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
So looking at the responses thus far there seems two groups that belive in one of the two statements
1) A mild wind should be able to cause a spit to sit-n-spin in the middle of a grass field 2) A mild wind should not be able to cause a spit to sit-n-spin in the middle of a grass field Granted some have provided videos as proof, but most have nothing to do with the topic at hand. The closest video to the topic at hand shows an airliner flexing and twisting in the wind.. but not moving. Now before you consider that as proof.. Take a close look at the title of the video, i.e. EXTREME WIND at Keflavik airport... Now I think it is safe to say that everyone agrees a Spitfire will move in EXTREME WINDS when sitting on a slick cement runway But again that example does not relate to what is being seen in the game What we are seeing in the game is a 4,000+lb Spitfire sitting in a filed of grass, engine off, spinning around in what appears to be far less than EXTREME WINDS. I think Catseye nailed it by pointing out that the 'symptom' is that of the friction between the tires and the ground being too small, which in turn allows the plane to spin freely. With that said, which of the two groups do you fall into?
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Test more the game and talk less in forums. |
#58
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Oh..
Your back? I thought you said you gave up? Anyway glad you back! So, based on your responce.. Ill put you down as being in group #1
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#59
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hey LoBiSoMeM
I think you may have me confused with someone else? In that as you can see from my first post in this thread, i.e. Quote:
As a mater of fact I think if you take the time to read my posts, as opposed to glazing over them with your preconceived notions, you will see that wind was considered in each of my posts. I hope that helps clear things up for you a bit! Or put it your way.. Read more talk less in forums
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#60
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
[QUOTE=LoBiSoMeM;331393]
Quote:
Sooooo, LoBiSoMeM is correct in identifying the wind. However, I fall into the camp with Ace of Aces in that there may be a coeficient of wheel drag that may be modeled a little too liberally. (MY opinion.) Seems to me that a 7 tonne aircraft should be a little more resistant to a wind of 10m/s. Thats about as fast as an olympic sprinter. So, both of you guys are on the right track. Mine is only an observation without any imperical data to go on. So for me, the devs are the guys to evaluate it if it is brought to their attention. Good flying chaps. |
![]() |
|
|