![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
View Poll Results: At which screen resolution are you flying in CoD? | |||
1024x768 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 1.57% |
1280x720 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 2.36% |
1280x800 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 1.18% |
1280x1024 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 5.12% |
1680x1050 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
53 | 20.87% |
1920x1080 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
100 | 39.37% |
Other (please specify) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
75 | 29.53% |
Voters: 254. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
1920x1200
__________________
Asus P8P67-M Core I7 2600k Asus HD6970 2GB G-DDR 5 8GB 1600mhz DDR 3 Win7 Pro64 Ms FFB 2 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1600x900
I can run it at my native resolution of 1920x1080 resonably well, just at times with heavy traffic, shadows and ssao and clouds on, textures at original it drops below my comfort level. I noticed that my best increase in fps is at this resolution, if I drop the resolution further I do not see any noticable effect, even when I go down to 1280x720 absolutely no increase in fps. Anybody else notice that? |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
1920 x 1200
Common enough to be in the list.
__________________
EVGA X58 FTW3 motherboard Intel 980X CPU, not OC'd yet, 3.46 Mhz Crucial Tracer memory 8-8-8-24 12GB Crucial M4 256GB SSD, WD Raptor 600 GB hard disk EVGA GTX580 graphics card HP ZR24W Monitor 1900 X 1200 24" Thrustmaster Warthog joystick Saitek Combat rudder pedals TrackIr 5 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1920x1200
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I voted other because of the on-line game play changes dramatically.
In SP it doesn't matter much for K/D ratio I conducted an experiment, found out the damage box's in on-line play change for the end user but not the other guy on the other end; say for instance I fly my 28 inch monitor 1920x1600 in IL2 @1024x768 because the hit box's become more bigger the objects are bigger and i have a theory that the bullets are bigger and I get faster kills. My K/D went way up after flying like this. Sure the planes and graphics look like crap but hey I want kills now.
__________________
71st Eagle Squadron www.anon6.com - Blogger on DCS Series 71st Mastiff's You-Tube " any failure you meet is never a defeat; merely a set up for a greater come back " Asus||i7x5930k||16gb3200||GTX10808gb||ATX1200Corsa ir||CBTitanium7.1||Win10x64||TrackIr4Pro/ir||gladiator pro mkII||siatekpedals||X52Throttle||G15Keyboard/RazerMouse|| 32"LCD||2x7" lilliputs,1x9inc |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
XBL GT: - Robotic Pope HyperLobby CS: - Robot_Pope |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmm, I don't quite follow that idea. My monitor is 1280 x 1024 and kills are down to good gunnery. Welshman and I watched a BF109 from high with a clear killing opportunity on a straight and level Spit. His convergence was crossing well short of the target and we could see ordinance actually colliding. Needless to say - Welshman jumped on it and with precise gunnery it was game over for that unlucky pilot. I don't think that monitor res would have made any difference.
__________________
MP ATAG_EvangelusE AMD A8 5600K Quad Core 3.6 Ghz - Win 7 64 - 8Gb Ram - GTX660ti 2Gb VRAM - FreeTrack - X52 - Asus 23' Monitor. Last edited by SEE; 08-18-2011 at 04:24 PM. |
![]() |
|
|