Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

View Poll Results: At which screen resolution are you flying in CoD?
1024x768 4 1.57%
1280x720 6 2.36%
1280x800 3 1.18%
1280x1024 13 5.12%
1680x1050 53 20.87%
1920x1080 100 39.37%
Other (please specify) 75 29.53%
Voters: 254. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-17-2011, 06:56 PM
DB605's Avatar
DB605 DB605 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Finland
Posts: 158
Default

1920x1200
__________________
Asus P8P67-M
Core I7 2600k
Asus HD6970 2GB G-DDR 5
8GB 1600mhz DDR 3
Win7 Pro64
Ms FFB 2
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-17-2011, 07:55 PM
senseispcc senseispcc is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 598
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TUCKIE_JG52 View Post
Simple curiosity...

1920x1080 here
1+ 59mhz
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-17-2011, 08:24 PM
skouras skouras is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Greece-Athens
Posts: 1,171
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by senseispcc View Post
1+ 59mhz
same
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-17-2011, 10:32 PM
NedLynch NedLynch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Southeast Florida, USA
Posts: 390
Default

1600x900
I can run it at my native resolution of 1920x1080 resonably well, just at times with heavy traffic, shadows and ssao and clouds on, textures at original it drops below my comfort level.

I noticed that my best increase in fps is at this resolution, if I drop the resolution further I do not see any noticable effect, even when I go down to 1280x720 absolutely no increase in fps.
Anybody else notice that?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-17-2011, 11:19 PM
louisv's Avatar
louisv louisv is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Montreal
Posts: 287
Default

1920 x 1200

Common enough to be in the list.
__________________
EVGA X58 FTW3 motherboard
Intel 980X CPU, not OC'd yet, 3.46 Mhz
Crucial Tracer memory 8-8-8-24 12GB
Crucial M4 256GB SSD, WD Raptor 600 GB hard disk
EVGA GTX580 graphics card
HP ZR24W Monitor 1900 X 1200 24"
Thrustmaster Warthog joystick
Saitek Combat rudder pedals
TrackIr 5
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-18-2011, 04:07 AM
miky miky is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 4
Default

1920x1200
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-18-2011, 08:31 AM
jimbop jimbop is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,064
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NedLynch View Post
1600x900
I can run it at my native resolution of 1920x1080 resonably well, just at times with heavy traffic, shadows and ssao and clouds on, textures at original it drops below my comfort level.

I noticed that my best increase in fps is at this resolution, if I drop the resolution further I do not see any noticable effect, even when I go down to 1280x720 absolutely no increase in fps.
Anybody else notice that?
Yes, I've noticed the same and use the same resolution for these reasons.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-18-2011, 01:52 PM
GF_Mastiff's Avatar
GF_Mastiff GF_Mastiff is offline
71st_Mastiff
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: EL Centro
Posts: 890
Default

I voted other because of the on-line game play changes dramatically.

In SP it doesn't matter much for K/D ratio

I conducted an experiment, found out the damage box's in on-line play change for the end user but not the other guy on the other end; say for instance I fly my 28 inch monitor 1920x1600 in IL2 @1024x768 because the hit box's become more bigger the objects are bigger and i have a theory that the bullets are bigger and I get faster kills. My K/D went way up after flying like this. Sure the planes and graphics look like crap but hey I want kills now.
__________________
71st Eagle Squadron
www.anon6.com - Blogger on DCS Series
71st Mastiff's You-Tube
" any failure you meet is never a defeat; merely a set up for a greater come back "
Asus||i7x5930k||16gb3200||GTX10808gb||ATX1200Corsa ir||CBTitanium7.1||Win10x64||TrackIr4Pro/ir||gladiator pro mkII||siatekpedals||X52Throttle||G15Keyboard/RazerMouse||
32"LCD||2x7" lilliputs,1x9inc
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-18-2011, 03:54 PM
Robotic Pope's Avatar
Robotic Pope Robotic Pope is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hertfordshire,England,UK
Posts: 1,520
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GF_Mastiff View Post
I voted other because of the on-line game play changes dramatically.

In SP it doesn't matter much for K/D ratio

I conducted an experiment, found out the damage box's in on-line play change for the end user but not the other guy on the other end; say for instance I fly my 28 inch monitor 1920x1600 in IL2 @1024x768 because the hit box's become more bigger the objects are bigger and i have a theory that the bullets are bigger and I get faster kills. My K/D went way up after flying like this. Sure the planes and graphics look like crap but hey I want kills now.
Really??? So a guy flying online with a very high resolution is likely to be shot at by bullets the size of basketballs? wow if thats true thats a horrible flaw.
__________________


XBL GT: - Robotic Pope
HyperLobby CS: - Robot_Pope
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-18-2011, 04:20 PM
SEE SEE is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,678
Default

Hmm, I don't quite follow that idea. My monitor is 1280 x 1024 and kills are down to good gunnery. Welshman and I watched a BF109 from high with a clear killing opportunity on a straight and level Spit. His convergence was crossing well short of the target and we could see ordinance actually colliding. Needless to say - Welshman jumped on it and with precise gunnery it was game over for that unlucky pilot. I don't think that monitor res would have made any difference.
__________________
MP ATAG_EvangelusE

AMD A8 5600K Quad Core 3.6 Ghz - Win 7 64 - 8Gb Ram - GTX660ti 2Gb VRAM - FreeTrack - X52 - Asus 23' Monitor.

Last edited by SEE; 08-18-2011 at 04:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.