![]() |
#51
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
"There are no distinctive "Singapore" or "Malaysian" objects to make the map more interesting."
True. By the way, there are not many distinctive local objects on most of East Front maps as well. Leningrad and Slovakia are the only exceptions, probably. And some existing "distinctive" objects are plain wrong and/or were installed with time machine technology, for example, breakwaters in Sevastopol Bay (constructed in 1970s in real life). And wrong toponymy...wrong hills...rivers...missing bays and lakes...etc. I better stop now ! ![]()
__________________
Q: Mr. Rall, what was the best tactic against the P-47? A: Against the P-47? Shoot him down! (Gunther Rall's lecture. June 2003, Finland) Last edited by dimlee; 03-04-2016 at 08:21 PM. |
#52
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Ar-2, Pe-2 (or Pe-3) with Gneiss radar. Ju-86, FW-200, FW-58, He-177, Ju-90, Ju-290 (OK, there was only one probably), Go-145, He-46, Do-215, Hs-126. Probably: Cant 1007, Ca 133 IAR 38/39, RWD-13. There were Hungarians as well, but info is scarce. Seaplanes are mentioned there: http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtop...?f=49&t=114464 I wonder where they were based. ![]()
__________________
Q: Mr. Rall, what was the best tactic against the P-47? A: Against the P-47? Shoot him down! (Gunther Rall's lecture. June 2003, Finland) |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So far as I know, the Hungarian Air Force has not played any considerable role in, and in the close vicinity of, the battle of Stalingrad. The Hungarian 2nd Army was holding the Northwest flank and had only Re-2000 fighters, He-46 recces, and Ca-135bis medium bombers in numbers (>10). And their majority was withdrawn due to attrition and retraining before the Stalingrad battle started.
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why don't put HVARs on P-51 and P-47? Will be an amazing (and pretty simple) update in 4.13.1...
![]() |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
P-47s have rockets available as a load out option. I Thought the P-51 (at least the C version) did as well but I am not 100% sure.
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Well it looks like Constanza and Varna/Sevastapol. Not sure how they came into play in Stalingrad. As far as the Regia Aeronautica, I looked here: http://www.cgsc.edu/CARL/nafziger/940IXAL.pdf 61st Gruppo appears to have operated Ca-311. 21st Gruppo had MC200/MC202 71st Gruppo with BR-20M, Ca-311, Ca-312, Ca-164. Can't find any mention of a Cant Z in Russia. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#58
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Cant Z was mentioned in some "second hand" sources without reference to documents. (I've done quick search, but didn't bookmark or copy). So might be a mistake and can be ignored.
__________________
Q: Mr. Rall, what was the best tactic against the P-47? A: Against the P-47? Shoot him down! (Gunther Rall's lecture. June 2003, Finland) |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rockets for p47 are triple launcher m8 not zero length hvar. Rockets need updating for fm 2, p47,p51, 60lb rockets and mixed bomb loads needed for beaufighter and mosquito as well. Since the triple launcher exists it needs to be added to a20g and p40m as well. Beaufighter with straight tail is also needed.
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Likewise, the SBD-6 would be an easy "upgrade" to an existing plane that requires just an FM change. B5N1 would be sort of useful for Sino-Japanese War scenarios, but that would require actual changes to aircraft exterior model. |
![]() |
|
|