Head Tracking with Cliffs of Dover - Page 55

Wolf_Rider · #**541** 02-24-2011, 02:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SEE

W-R , NP know exactly how it works, send them an email - given their customer support reputation I am sure they will send you full and accurate details.

Maybe you or NP can answer a simple question (and I suggest all FT users simply repeat it to any quote that involves 'Hack', 'stolen', 'not clean'!).

QUESTION...........Why have NP been unable to claim damages or prevent the use of their original DLL against, or by, 3rd party developers?

Quote:

Originally Posted by SEE

Tut, Tut, naughty boy, using such language.....must I remind you to at least try and answer my simple question?

QUESTION...........Why have NP been unable to claim damages or prevent the use of their original DLL against, or by, 3rd party developers?

I seem to be having De ja Views (excuse the pun), haven't I asked this before?

answer is the same as last time

SEE · #**542** 02-24-2011, 02:59 AM

Last time?......apologies - I must have missed it!
Please point me to it, it may be buried in approx. 3000 posts, or better still, remind me of what you said.

Wolf_Rider · #**543** 02-24-2011, 03:01 AM

you are aware FT is a hack, aren't you See?

sigur_ros · #**544** 02-24-2011, 03:08 AM

There is no TrackIR interface in FSX, Troll_Rider.

"We use simconnect to "talk" with FSX, as does some other 3rd party hardware and software." http://forum.naturalpoint.com/forum/...t&Number=20766

Wolf_Rider · #**545** 02-24-2011, 03:14 AM

FSX is a trackIR enhanced game..... this one has been gone over before

sigur_ros · #**546** 02-24-2011, 03:18 AM

Please explain quote then.

"We use simconnect to "talk" with FSX, as does some other 3rd party hardware and software." http://forum.naturalpoint.com/forum/...t&Number=20766

SEE · #**547** 02-24-2011, 03:19 AM

Which brings me back to my question.....no need to repeat it, its five above this one - but, until it is answered, I for one cannot simply assume (or claim) it is 'hacked' as you and others put it.

I would expect a manufacturer to protect their 'intellectual property' through civil action. If that were not the case I would have to question wether it was in fact their 'Intelectual property', which could possibly explain that manufacturer having to devise an alternative.

Wolf_Rider · #**548** 02-24-2011, 03:23 AM

the answer was given See...

what does "civil action" mean to a hack?

Wolf_Rider · #**549** 02-24-2011, 03:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sigur_ros

Please explain quote then.

"We use simconnect to "talk" with FSX, as does some other 3rd party hardware and software." http://forum.naturalpoint.com/forum/...t&Number=20766

rather a straightforward statement there and no explanation necessary (even for Gracie)

@

See... you're going nowhere, don't you see that?

SEE · #**550** 02-24-2011, 03:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

r See... you're going nowhere, don't you see that?

That is not an answer to my question.

But one I suspect you cannot answer and yet continue to assert copywright infringement as a reason why FT should not be inclusive alongside TrackIR. Untill you or NP answer the question, you cannot substantiate that argument against inclusion. I would like both for the benefit of all!