Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

View Poll Results: Battle of France as add on?
Yes, will buy this. 55 58.51%
OK, if for free. 21 22.34%
No, looking forward to Eastern front. 18 19.15%
Voters: 94. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-04-2012, 02:30 PM
fruitbat's Avatar
fruitbat fruitbat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: S E England
Posts: 1,065
Default

Lets see what tomorrow brings then.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-04-2012, 02:38 PM
Red Dragon-DK Red Dragon-DK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 213
Default

Here is the info you need.

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthr...28174&page=120
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-24-2012, 04:37 PM
SiThSpAwN's Avatar
SiThSpAwN SiThSpAwN is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC Canada
Posts: 665
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSix View Post
Today will not update. Continue discussions on Monday.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-24-2012, 11:00 PM
Codex Codex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hoppers Crossing, Vic, Australia
Posts: 624
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5./JG27.Farber View Post

Code:
 Despawn Script
  private bool isAiControlledPlane (AiAircraft aircraft) 
  {
        if (aircraft == null) 
        { 
            return false;
        }
 
        Player [] players = GamePlay.gpRemotePlayers ();
        foreach (Player p in players) 
        {    
            if (p != null && (p.Place () is AiAircraft) && (p.Place () as AiAircraft) == aircraft)
            { 
                return false;
            }
        }
 
        return true;
    }
 
    private void destroyPlane (AiAircraft aircraft) {
        if (aircraft != null) { 
            aircraft.Destroy ();
        }
    }
 
    private void explodeFuelTank (AiAircraft aircraft) 
  {
        if (aircraft != null) 
        { 
            aircraft.hitNamed (part.NamedDamageTypes.FuelTank0Exploded);
        }
    }
 
    private void destroyAiControlledPlane (AiAircraft aircraft) {
        if (isAiControlledPlane (aircraft)) {
            destroyPlane (aircraft);
        }
    }
 
    private void damageAiControlledPlane (AiActor actor) {
        if (actor == null || !(actor is AiAircraft)) { 
            return;
        }
 
        AiAircraft aircraft = (actor as AiAircraft);
 
        if (!isAiControlledPlane (aircraft)) {
            return;
        }
 
        if (aircraft == null) { 
            return;
        }
 
        aircraft.hitNamed (part.NamedDamageTypes.ControlsElevatorDisabled);
        aircraft.hitNamed (part.NamedDamageTypes.ControlsAileronsDisabled);
        aircraft.hitNamed (part.NamedDamageTypes.ControlsRudderDisabled);
        aircraft.hitNamed (part.NamedDamageTypes.FuelPumpFailure);
 
        int iNumOfEngines = (aircraft.Group() as AiAirGroup).aircraftEnginesNum();
        for (int i = 0; i < iNumOfEngines; i++)
        {
            aircraft.hitNamed((part.NamedDamageTypes)Enum.Parse(typeof(part.NamedDamageTypes), "Eng" + i.ToString() + "TotalFailure"));
        }
 
        /***Timeout (240, () =>
                {explodeFuelTank (aircraft);}
            );
         * ***/
 
        Timeout (300, () =>
                {destroyPlane (aircraft);}
            );
    }
Where did you get that code snipet from Farber?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-25-2012, 10:31 AM
Skoshi Tiger Skoshi Tiger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,197
Default

I vote for option 1. (Hmmm maybe this should be a poll?)

And I, for one, am very grateful for any information given.

Keep up the good work! I’m looking forward to future updates and the sequel in development!


Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSix View Post
SDK has a very low priority.



Yes, you are right. I've not enough information about CloD and I've a lot of restrictions on the disclosure of details.
But, the community has very simple choice:
1) communication as is. It will improve over time as I study language and I obtain new data.
2) no communication. My main task is publication of news and Friday updates, I can do only it.

I'll tell more about our situation on Monday.


Discussion about BF-109 and FM
will be deleted or moved. I very politely asked not to begin it here.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-25-2012, 11:35 AM
BlackSix BlackSix is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Moscow, Russian Federation
Posts: 533
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwiatek View Post
BlackSix Flight Model and performacne of planes in CLOD is still far from good and with planty of errors which is noot good for combat flight simulator.

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-25-2012, 12:09 PM
Kwiatek's Avatar
Kwiatek Kwiatek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSix View Post
Well i think double facepalm work good too for 1C FM's


Well if 1C would clarify FM&performace subcject and would inform us what they are planning to do and what bug and errors are known i think any facepalm would be not nessesery for any side.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-25-2012, 01:26 PM
PotNoodles PotNoodles is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSix View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSix View Post
Hi!
My name is Alexander, I am a mission designer and community manager in the 1С:Maddox Games.
This is an experimental thread for publishing small news and answers to common questions.
A "common question" is something that keeps popping up all of the time and one that could do with an answer. All of the questions I have seen in this thread are the ones most commonly mentioned in this forum. Maybe you should draw up a list of what we can talk about and what we cannot talk about. Clearly some people don't understand what you mean when you say "answers to common questions" and then reply like you have done above.

Last edited by PotNoodles; 08-25-2012 at 06:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-25-2012, 12:02 PM
Madfish Madfish is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 423
Default

That double facepalm picture is looking hilarious. Thanks for posting.

Looking forward to the announcements in the coming next week. I hope the Su26 will be part of it
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-25-2012, 03:47 PM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSix View Post
Hi!
My name is Alexander, I am a mission designer and community manager in the 1С:Maddox Games..
............................
No BlackSix, I think you've got it wrong.

I think Luthier is Alexander

I think you are Sergei

...and we are the crowd......


I expect I'll get an off-topic infraction for that.

You may need 'Alexander' to translate
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.