Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 08-31-2012, 08:19 PM
ATAG_Dutch ATAG_Dutch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATAG_Snapper View Post
Dutch, you forgot the good looking but modest part.....
In your dreams.............
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 08-31-2012, 10:29 PM
*Buzzsaw* *Buzzsaw* is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 467
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATAG_Dutch View Post
Hi Buzzsaw,

I wasn't intending to say 'look folks, everything is wonderful!' by posting this vid, just intending to show all of the people currently having overheating and energy retention problems in the current patch that there is a 'workaround' in order to play the game as it currently stands, with a better chance of matching the 109s with these settings as a basic guide.

The 50% rad setting works for all the RAF a/c currently modelled in the game.

I think by now, most people know that there are errors in all the FMs, both RAF and LW/RA. There are many threads to this effect in the FM/DM section.

This thread was intended to be about getting the best out of the game currently, but thanks for posting the data.
And no criticism intended of your good work. The issue is the game, not attempts by experienced players to get the best out of a given aircraft.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 08-31-2012, 11:26 PM
NZtyphoon NZtyphoon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NZ
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATAG_Dutch View Post
Hi Buzzsaw,

I wasn't intending to say 'look folks, everything is wonderful!' by posting this vid, just intending to show all of the people currently having overheating and energy retention problems in the current patch that there is a 'workaround' in order to play the game as it currently stands, with a better chance of matching the 109s with these settings as a basic guide.

The 50% rad setting works for all the RAF a/c currently modelled in the game.

I think by now, most people know that there are errors in all the FMs, both RAF and LW/RA. There are many threads to this effect in the FM/DM section.

This thread was intended to be about getting the best out of the game currently, but thanks for posting the data.
Much appreciated; at least for now this is a reasonable work around and my computer room no longer smells of fried Merlin and Spitfire/Hurricane chips. BTW are you that Brylcreem guy?
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 08-31-2012, 11:40 PM
ATAG_Dutch ATAG_Dutch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NZtyphoon View Post
BTW are you that Brylcreem guy?
I wish I had enough hair to use the stuff on mate.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 09-01-2012, 12:55 AM
trademe900 trademe900 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 186
Default

ATAG Dutch- thanks heaps for this post! This is a huge difference, it is amazing how much faster the plane is when it's flown like that with the lower radiator settings. I can actually cruise around at 300mph all day now. I used to just have it on full because the engines just kept blowing. Now by controlling the pitch and mixture it just goes at 300mph no sweat... What's amazing is that I think I can now keep the 109's away, or even chase one!!!

Last edited by trademe900; 09-01-2012 at 06:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 09-01-2012, 02:09 AM
ATAG_Dutch ATAG_Dutch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trademe900 View Post
What's amazing is that I think I can now keep the 109's away, or even chase one!!!
That's the ticket old boy! Got to keep the jolly old Hun at bay, what?!

Seriously, it's good to know it's helped. Thanks for posting.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 09-01-2012, 07:16 AM
SlipBall's Avatar
SlipBall SlipBall is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: down Island, NY
Posts: 2,719
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATAG_Dutch View Post
That's the ticket old boy! Got to keep the jolly old Hun at bay, what?!

Seriously, it's good to know it's helped. Thanks for posting.

Your efforts are helping people with improving their piloting, and so I thank you too...this really was not the best thread for me to target, for criticizing the number junkies.
__________________



GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 09-01-2012, 10:41 AM
ATAG_Dutch ATAG_Dutch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SlipBall View Post
Your efforts are helping people with improving their piloting, and so I thank you too...this really was not the best thread for me to target, for criticizing the number junkies.
No problem Slipball.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 09-01-2012, 07:01 PM
ATAG_Dutch ATAG_Dutch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,793
Default

1st post edited with further info.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 09-01-2012, 07:18 PM
28_Condor 28_Condor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 108
Default

I followed this steps and got me really mater the same time with the boost turned

But I managed only 280mph with the airplane trimmed
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.