Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 05-02-2012, 11:59 AM
Hood Hood is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 318
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid View Post
oh and i remember well how you hide away when i finally found the method to stand high g by being sink in a breathable fluid , of course i got it many times wrong before getting it right
I must have missed this one. I was reading about this 20 years ago. Hardly original, like most of your "discoveries".

In fact, I don't think any of your "discoveries" have been original thoughts. Funny that.

Hood
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 05-02-2012, 12:12 PM
raaaid's Avatar
raaaid raaaid is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,329
Default

maybe not original but independent yes

for example i disover this independenlty, that is without prior knowledge of it, and of course i went many times wrong before hitting the right idea:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_breathing

Space travel
Liquid immersion provides a way to reduce the physical stress of G forces. Forces applied to fluids are distributed as omnidirectional pressures. Because liquids cannot be practically compressed, they do not change density under high acceleration such as performed in aerial maneuvers or space travel. A person immersed in liquid of the same density as tissue has acceleration forces distributed around the body, rather than applied at a single point such as a seat or harness straps. This principle is used in a new type of G-suit called the Libelle G-suit, which allows aircraft pilots to remain conscious and functioning at more than 10 G acceleration by surrounding them with water in a rigid suit.
Acceleration protection by liquid immersion is limited by the differential density of body tissues and immersion fluid, limiting the utility of this method to about 15 to 20 G.[53] Extending acceleration protection beyond 20 G requires filling the lungs with fluid of density similar to water. An astronaut totally immersed in liquid, with liquid inside all body cavities, will feel little effect from extreme G forces because the forces on a liquid are distributed equally, and in all directions simultaneously. However effects will be felt because of density differences between different body tissues, so an upper acceleration limit still exists.
Liquid breathing for acceleration protection may never be practical because of the difficulty of finding a suitable breathing medium of similar density to water that is compatible with lung tissue. Perfluorocarbon fluids are twice as dense as water, hence unsuitable for this application.[2]
__________________
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e222/raaaid/fmkld-1.jpg2.4ghz dual core cpu
3gb ram
ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2

I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 05-02-2012, 01:36 PM
Outlaw Outlaw is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 182
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid View Post
you take my words literaly, i studied feminist literautre not so much the language
In the past you have mentioned your degree when noting your mastery of the English language. Your new statement above explains a LOT.

Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid View Post
for example i said 10000 g not infinite
I'm pretty sure you said infinite but, maybe not, so I'll acquiesce.

Regardless, it does not matter what number you actually stated. It is wrong because you denied that the astronaut would feel the actual g-forces.

Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid View Post
and i said i "USUALLY" win turning left and lose turning right
Actually, you said this...
Quote:
myself of course i tried both senses and i know perfectly the reason i turn left instead or right:

turning left= win
turning right = lose
Nowhere did you say, "USUALLY". In fact, aside from the above, you have not used the word usually at all in this thread. Furthermore, aside from the above, I am the only one that has used the word usually in this entire thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid View Post
i dont know why people tendency to turn left, i dont know, you dont know but we both guessed
I will reiterate, "THE TITLE OF THE THREAD STATES THAT YOU DO KNOW".

Do you wish to recant your statement?

--Outlaw.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 05-02-2012, 01:57 PM
raaaid's Avatar
raaaid raaaid is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,329
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Outlaw View Post
In the past you have mentioned your degree when noting your mastery of the English language. Your new statement above explains a LOT.

"yet you called me a lier about my degree and when i post proof you didnt withdraw"



I'm pretty sure you said infinite but, maybe not, so I'll acquiesce.

Regardless, it does not matter what number you actually stated. It is wrong because you denied that the astronaut would feel the actual g-forces.

"it would feel zero g however the acelerations is, thats the thing about indiferent buoyancy"

Actually, you said this...

"if i say win its tacitly understand usually, you as contrarian rather undersatand tacitly always"

Nowhere did you say, "USUALLY". In fact, aside from the above, you have not used the word usually at all in this thread. Furthermore, aside from the above, I am the only one that has used the word usually in this entire thread.

"neither dis i say always as you said i said"

I will reiterate, "THE TITLE OF THE THREAD STATES THAT YOU DO KNOW".

Do you wish to recant your statement?

"i already did correct my first impresion by the left handed dna explanation so i might be worng in my 1st statemnet though a fokker dr1 turns much faster one sense than the other due to preccesion"

--Outlaw.
so youre work having fun arguing right

well i respect you since you dont insult me as others but next time you say a thing as my degrees being imaginary plz have the manhood to retract your offensive for me statement when gieven proofs

if it helps i see you as a friend after all these years
__________________
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e222/raaaid/fmkld-1.jpg2.4ghz dual core cpu
3gb ram
ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2

I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL

Last edited by raaaid; 05-02-2012 at 02:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 05-02-2012, 02:00 PM
raaaid's Avatar
raaaid raaaid is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,329
Default

oh and the proof of the world POSIBLY being satged and that in indiferent-neutral buyancy is like 0g even at erath where theres one G

__________________
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e222/raaaid/fmkld-1.jpg2.4ghz dual core cpu
3gb ram
ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2

I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 05-02-2012, 02:01 PM
Outlaw Outlaw is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 182
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid View Post
maybe not original but independent yes

for example i disover this independenlty, that is without prior knowledge of it, and of course i went many times wrong before hitting the right idea:
Liquid immersion and body cavity filling does nothing to eliminate g-forces. It simply allows an astronaut to withstand the g-forces more easily.

Your previous claim was that an occupant of your craft would not experience any g-forces at all.

Regardless, I reject fluid immersion as anything more than a curious concept b/c it can't be used in the real world. Who in their right mind would submit to having all of their orifices and other empty spaces in their bodies pumped full of fluid?

--Outlaw.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 05-02-2012, 02:06 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

I knew a girl like that.....
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 05-02-2012, 02:12 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
oh and the proof of the world POSIBLY being satged
Nice bit of ass covering ambiguity there raaaid 'posibly'
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 05-02-2012, 02:24 PM
raaaid's Avatar
raaaid raaaid is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,329
Default

well ive been thinking about it and youre right youll feel wheres down even in a breathable fluid since the way human balance works as a partially filled botle

anyway this idea is intended to shoot an astronaut to space jules verne style

dont you admit i found independently the solution after quite many tries as you can tell from ubi proving verne a visionary?

its not like he was stupid and simple with his cannon idea

maybe he could see the future as the cannon is a feasbale idea

there are many examples of visionary literature


gulliver with the exactitude on mars satellites

poe with the cannibal wrecage

the titanium which had identical ficttitious fate than the real titanic

hey i painted this as premonitory:





and this as my far away past









tobe continued some day

edit:

i just noticed, oh the subcouncious i swear it was not in porpouse

IiIith project
__________________
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e222/raaaid/fmkld-1.jpg2.4ghz dual core cpu
3gb ram
ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2

I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL

Last edited by raaaid; 05-02-2012 at 02:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 05-02-2012, 09:26 PM
AKA_Tenn AKA_Tenn is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 213
Default

umm drugs are bad Mmkay?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.