could relativity proof have been falsified?

[raaaid]

Originally Posted by SEE

If all the wavelengths that make the spectrum of light were to bend at the same speed then refraction will not occur. This is probably why atmospheric interference was discounted.

not what they found out its a star was out of place in an eclipse

as a pencil point is out of place when in water and gets refracted

point one:
they couldnt account for suns atmosphere refraction

point two:

they couldnt account for earths atmosphere refraction that varies with the angle

point 3:

they could account on the solar winds refraction

point 4:

they couldnt account on the milky way stellar dust refraction

without acounting this all they were able to conclude a star moved position by gravitational lensing confirming CAUSALITY and making a guy totally unable for maths in school and with a very low IQ according the tests the most intelligent man of mans history, oh and confirming causality which confirms we are just predictable machines with no soul nor free will just as stones so if eisntein was a psicological mistreater it was not his fault, just as guilty as a stone which falls and kills someone

[Outlaw]

Originally Posted by raaaid

anyway the only prove i have light is instant and therefore cause and affect is simultaneous allowing tt is that the bending of light that proves light is slow is false because of sun atmosphere refraction

The above is a totally worthless and completely useless statement.

You can't PROVE anything. You THINK that atmospheric refraction should account for the bending. That's it, nothing more.

Why won't you show the observed refraction versus the calculated refraction?

--Outlaw.

[raaaid]

einstein predicted the position of an star which was out of place due to space curving which he predicted with exactitude

the fact i cant know what starlight bending is expected from suns atmosphere is the very same problem eisntin had to face

i wont turn it the other way around and tell you to show me einstein calculations on sun atmosphere starbending

everything is a pantomine the blue screen on tv is massive

do you know what i think the future is now?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-17680904



edit:

how did eisntein account for this:

Light refraction by the Sun's atmosphere is calculated.As detected from the Earth, the refraction can deflect a light ray emitted from the Sun's limb by 13 arcseconds or a starlight ray grazing the solar limb by 26, an effect 15 times larger than the gravitational deflection.

edit:

check out this huge chromatic aberration caused by refracted light:



i take the impostors of this world seriously no more, they are just some crooks with no class, i foresee a peacefull revolution and they exposed for the low crooks they are

[SEE]

His (Einstein) theory was scoffed at at the time. It was the result of studies and scientific investigation that eventually confirmed his theory and thus accepted in the absence of an alternative theory.

Given the development and research into this, the development of 'Gravity Lenses' I think you are going to struggle with your argument that this is simply 'refraction'. Physicists don't just accept a theory without testing it and many theorys exist simply because there is no alternative at the time - Quantum theory, Domain Theory, etc.

[SEE]

His (Einstein) theory was scoffed at at the time. It was the result of studies and scientific investigation that eventually confirmed his theory and thus accepted in the absence of an alternative theory.

Given the development and research into this, the development of 'Gravity Lenses' I think you are going to struggle with your argument that this is simply 'refraction'. Physicists don't just accept a theory without testing it and many theorys exist simply because there is no alternative at the time - Quantum theory, Domain Theory, etc.

[raaaid]

yeah i guess the same development china put into putting a man into space

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBL98p0wZ7g

your argument its invalid its the authority criteria, the church says so then its true

[bongodriver]

But does the fridge light really go out when you close the door?

[Outlaw]

Originally Posted by raaaid

einstein predicted the position of an star which was out of place due to space curving which he predicted with exactitude

the fact i cant know what starlight bending is expected from suns atmosphere is the very same problem eisntin had to face

i wont turn it the other way around and tell you to show me einstein calculations on sun atmosphere starbending

YOU are the one claiming that you are the smartest human being in the world and that everyone else is wrong. It is up to YOU to prove it.

I would suggest NOT following the same logic you used in the following instances....

The fornix "muscle"
Eyeball tracking in the Apache's targeting system
"Overunity" water pumps
"Infinite" velocity of water exiting a hose
"Inifinte" acceleration of spacecraft
etc.
etc.
etc.

Originally Posted by raaaid

everything is a pantomine the blue screen on tv is massive

i take the impostors of this world seriously no more, they are just some crooks with no class, i foresee a peacefull revolution and they exposed for the low crooks they are

Then why do you bother to post? If you believe everything is faked who are you talking to?

--Outlaw.

[raaaid]

Originally Posted by bongodriver

But does the fridge light really go out when you close the door?

it doesnt even exist if you dont look at it

[raaaid]

Originally Posted by Outlaw

YOU are the one claiming that you are the smartest human being in the world and that everyone else is wrong.

Then why do you bother to post? If you believe everything is faked who are you talking to?

--Outlaw.

no i think the worlds staged by a MAJORITY with tt tech much smarter than me