Patch Status - Page 4

Vengeanze · #1 10-04-2011, 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nearmiss

Vengeanze

Why would someone kiss their cow?

How could anyone eat squid and call it delicacy, when it is fish bait?

The answer likes in the irrationality of mankind.

Right!!

Edit: However the other way around (eating a cow and kissing a squid) is perfectly normal.

Malc29 · #2 10-04-2011, 04:25 PM

Thanks for the update Luthier. It is good to be aware of the current situation.

Can you just clarify please. The patch tomorrow will be the same as the current beta patch but with problems identified during testing fixed i.e. no additional features to those in the current beta?

Ze-Jamz · #3 10-04-2011, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Malc29

Thanks for the update Luthier. It is good to be aware of the current situation.

Can you just clarify please. The patch tomorrow will be the same as the current beta patch but with problems identified during testing fixed i.e. no additional features to those in the current beta?

I would of thought it was obvious that this NEW beta wouldn't be the same as the first m8 :\

If thats what you are asking

Malc29 · #4 10-04-2011, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz

I would of thought it was obvious that this NEW beta wouldn't be the same as the first m8 :\

If thats what you are asking

I am asking if there is anything in addition to that in the current Beta patch or whether it is the current beta with fixes for the issues identified during testing so that we can feedback whether they have managed to fix them.

Quote:

We’re actually going to release another beta version of the same patch tomorrow and see how it’s testing the rest of the week.

klem · #5 10-04-2011, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Malc29

Thanks for the update Luthier. It is good to be aware of the current situation.

Can you just clarify please. The patch tomorrow will be the same as the current beta patch but with problems identified during testing fixed i.e. no additional features to those in the current beta?

I expect it to be the same beta patch with some aspects adjusted from beta feedback. At least that would be interim progress in a beta that isn't finalised yet. I doubt if the scope of the replacement beta will be greater than the initial beta patch which they haven't released formally yet through Steam.

adonys · #6 10-04-2011, 05:51 PM

[PCH] (2011.10.05) supposed next Beta
[PCH] (2011.09.06) v1.03.15527 Beta

so.. you would quietly accept that only real progress between these two patches should only be some brighter colors?

for a month of code development?

really?!!

JG52Krupi · #7 10-04-2011, 05:59 PM

Great news, a second version is a great idea.

Thanks luthier.

JG53Frankyboy · #8 10-04-2011, 06:21 PM

i dont think they are allowed to skip XP support till thier next AdOn - than the player have to decide if he want to buy and merge it into CoD.

Sven · #9 10-04-2011, 06:22 PM

Thanks for the news Luthier, looking forward to testing out the upcoming Beta-patch!

klem · #10 10-04-2011, 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adonys

[PCH] (2011.10.05) supposed next Beta
[PCH] (2011.09.06) v1.03.15527 Beta

so.. you would quietly accept that only real progress between these two patches should only be some brighter colors?

for a month of code development?

really?!!

If that was to me adonys, its not what I accept, its more what I expect they have been doing. Of course I expect more progress than some bright colours and we have it, the biggest one being the sound fix which the pure Steam guys haven't even had yet.

They've had 4 weeks to pick up on our feedback (a LOT of it) and work on (some of?) it. If they've squeezed anthything else in then its a bonus but what would be the point of releasing one beta then releasing different one when they haven't even formally released the first? It would be a beta patch on top of a beta patch which would confuse feedback and leave the pure Steam guys sitting wondering when they are going to get anything new.

On XP support
I don't think MG could afford to drop it, they would lose a significant part of the potential market. Don't forget this dev began when XP was the hot Windows OS. Its ok for those of us with new PCs and Win 7 to take that line but not really realistic for a business to do that.

If they've developed something that XP can't support, well I suppose thats one kind of progress, but a bit short sighted. If they've been forced down that route to meet their new vision well then yes, its hard cheese on the XP market and bye bye to quite a few potential customers.