Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-09-2012, 03:08 PM
major_setback's Avatar
major_setback major_setback is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lund Sweden
Posts: 1,415
Default How many non-combat simmers will the Su-26 attract?

I wonder how many non-combat simmers the Su-26 will attract.
The whole CoD game costs less now (9 pounds where I live) than some of the better FSX add-ons.

Actually the Su-26 add-on for FSX costs 15 pounds!!!
http://secure.simmarket.com/eaw-sukhoi-su-26.phtml

http://www.alabeo.com/index.php?acci...duct&correl=76



.
__________________
All CoD screenshots here:
http://s58.photobucket.com/albums/g260/restranger/

__________


Flying online as Setback.

Last edited by major_setback; 10-09-2012 at 03:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-09-2012, 03:11 PM
CaptainDoggles's Avatar
CaptainDoggles CaptainDoggles is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,198
Default

None.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-09-2012, 03:24 PM
major_setback's Avatar
major_setback major_setback is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lund Sweden
Posts: 1,415
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles View Post
None.

Really?

They get the environment, and a lot of other aircraft too for the price.

Compare the FSX environment: FSX su-26 on youtube -





I'm sure there will be a review of the Su-26 before long in the flight sim magazines, and on the general aviation sim sites.

I think it should appeal to a few, at least.

.
__________________
All CoD screenshots here:
http://s58.photobucket.com/albums/g260/restranger/

__________


Flying online as Setback.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-09-2012, 05:53 PM
CaptainDoggles's Avatar
CaptainDoggles CaptainDoggles is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by major_setback View Post
Really?

They get the environment, and a lot of other aircraft too for the price.

Compare the FSX environment: FSX su-26 on youtube -


I'm sure there will be a review of the Su-26 before long in the flight sim magazines, and on the general aviation sim sites.

I think it should appeal to a few, at least.

.
Anyone who flies civilian sims likely already has FSX. You think they're going to buy this buggy piece of trash for one single aircraft?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-09-2012, 06:28 PM
major_setback's Avatar
major_setback major_setback is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lund Sweden
Posts: 1,415
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles View Post
Anyone who flies civilian sims likely already has FSX. You think they're going to buy this buggy piece of trash for one single aircraft?
Yes.
General Aviation enthusiasts are used to forking out money for extras.
I flew FSX until I tired of it. I bought add-on scenery, planes etc.(shockwave WWII aircraft too) spending large amounts of money on my 'hobby'.
I also bought X-plane without flying it more than once. I'm sure I'm not the only fool out there.

As I stated, the whole of CoD is cheaper than one add-on for FSX, and you get more than one single aircraft. The Tiger Moth would interest a GA enthusiast.
__________________
All CoD screenshots here:
http://s58.photobucket.com/albums/g260/restranger/

__________


Flying online as Setback.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-09-2012, 07:14 PM
CaptainDoggles's Avatar
CaptainDoggles CaptainDoggles is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by major_setback View Post
Yes.
General Aviation enthusiasts are used to forking out money for extras.
Not buggy ones that are barely functional.

Quote:
As I stated, the whole of CoD is cheaper than one add-on for FSX, and you get more than one single aircraft.
Not one of which is modeled appropriately, and ALL of which are subject to the completely bogus physics we have.

Aircraft flying with no tail or no wings? Please

Stop deceiving yourself.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-09-2012, 09:32 PM
Feathered_IV's Avatar
Feathered_IV Feathered_IV is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,471
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles View Post
Anyone who flies civilian sims likely already has FSX. You think they're going to buy this buggy piece of trash for one single aircraft?
I expect they would mock the sim and the Su-26 for its antimatter weapons. And rightly so. You can bet your arse that Oleg would never have allowed his product to be polluted by such idiot gimmicks.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-09-2012, 09:49 PM
TX-EcoDragon TX-EcoDragon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 55
Default

I can assure you that there were many real world aerobatic pilots who were anxiously awaiting what was expected to be one of the best aerobatic flight models out there, if not the absolute, bar raising best.

Sure, I own every other sim there is, and use each one for what it does better than the others, but none of them, no sim ever produced does a very good job of modelling edge of the envelope physics as it pertains to aerobatic aircraft. I saw the potential of the IL-2 engine a long time ago, and that is why we were using Fw-190s as our demonstration aircraft, even though "FSX was out", as was X-Plane, Condor, LockOn, and more recently sims like Aerofly fs which is more or less dedicated to aerobatic flying, and day VFR "fun". Yet we still waited for a sim that wasn't a joke in the aerobatic FM department, we hoped the SU-26 would deliver.

At this point, I am unable to try it....and most of my acro friends are waiting on me to give them my review. I'm trying to ignore some of the silly things I see in the videos right now, and I'm ashamed that the thing has Rayguns and crap on it...but whatever, we'll see.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-10-2012, 10:19 AM
Gabelschwanz Teufel's Avatar
Gabelschwanz Teufel Gabelschwanz Teufel is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 62
Default

0
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-12-2012, 06:21 AM
Jam656es Jam656es is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7
Default

I wonder how many non-combat simmers the Su-26 will attract.

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.