Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-29-2012, 03:26 PM
Strike Strike is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 684
Default

OH MY GOD! THE TRACERS!!!!







They are beautiful!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-29-2012, 03:46 PM
=AN=Apache =AN=Apache is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 36
Default

Question to the devs or technical features:

Is there a better forma'de instalção?

Using the integrity check would be enough or will be advised to delete everything and download everything from scratch?

tks
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-29-2012, 03:48 PM
JG52Uther's Avatar
JG52Uther JG52Uther is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,358
Default

I deleted everything, but thats only because I pressed the wrong button! I meant to verify cache...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-29-2012, 03:54 PM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by =AN=Apache View Post
Question to the devs or technical features:

Is there a better forma'de instalção?

Using the integrity check would be enough or will be advised to delete everything and download everything from scratch?

tks


If you do the integrity check, you will go back to the last official version (before all the recent betas).

If you uninstall everything, download and reinstall, it will also get you to the latest official version.

So, they do the same thing, but the integrity check takes less time. I prefer the integrity check

My checklist:
1) Verify integrity of local files (to get back to last official version)

2) Go to your documents\1c softclub\IL-2 sturmovik cliffs of dover folder and go into the cache folder. Delete everything in there (the game will rebuild it based on the new version next time you run the sim).

3) Extract the beta patch in the game folder (c:\whatever_you_named_it\steam\steamapps\common\I L-2 sturmovik cliffs of dover) and let it overwrite anything it wants to overwrite

4) Run the sim one to force it to rebuild the cache.

5) Start a free flight quick mission to force it to add anything else it might need in the cache.

6) Exit the sim.

7) Restart the sim.

Now you can test your frame rates with a clean install of the latest beta, as well as a correct cache folder for your version. If you skip steps 5,6,7 you might see that initially you get worse performance, because the game might still be adding files to the cache. However, the next time you start it, it will be better and you will get the true performance.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-29-2012, 04:13 PM
Duke88 Duke88 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 25
Default

hello everybody!

Can I install this patch in the original version of the game or have I to install after the alpha patch?

thank you!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-29-2012, 04:19 PM
simast simast is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 59
Default

Patch 1.07 in action:



My spects are in signature..
__________________
Windows 7 64-bit | AMD Phenom II X4 3.4 GHz | GeForce GTX 460 1Gb | 8 GB RAM | SSD | Track IR 5
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-30-2012, 05:48 AM
Avirex Avirex is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1
Default

Hello everybody.

Back on CoD for testing.
I'm happy to see that the sim is still alive.

Is it mandatory to have the mini fix installed to install this last patch ?

Last edited by Avirex; 06-30-2012 at 05:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-06-2012, 01:06 AM
katdogfizzow katdogfizzow is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 297
Default

WARNING: sendpace link is loaded with adware and browser hijacks if you click indiscriminately FAIL

Who put THAT up there???!! They should be spanked.

nice. that was fun to undo and uninstall. #&&^#(%^(@%^

On to the next link.

Last edited by katdogfizzow; 07-06-2012 at 01:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-06-2012, 09:07 AM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default BlackSix - Data anomaly

Blacksix I am making speed and climb tests and scripting out results including these:
part.ParameterTypes.I_EngineBoostPress
and
part.ParameterTypes.I_EngineManPress

I get different values for these in any set of readings which makes it difficult to analyse the results.

For example in the Hurricane Mk I 100 octane I can get I_EngineBoostPress of 8.1 while while I_EngineManPress reads 5.4 (same as cockpit gauge) at 3000rpm, also 8.8 and 6.3 at 2650 rpm.

Can you please ask Luthier to explain these differences and which parameter we should be using when comparing with historical data?

I also found that Boost Override Cutout does not change either of these readings so can Luthier explain that please?

I'd like to get these tests finished and fed back to you before any patch updates so could I have an answer quickly?
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-11-2012, 09:59 PM
undpilot87 undpilot87 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 34
Default Give me a break.

Quote:
Originally Posted by katdogfizzow View Post
WARNING: sendpace link is loaded with adware and browser hijacks if you click indiscriminately FAIL

Who put THAT up there???!! They should be spanked.

nice. that was fun to undo and uninstall. #&&^#(%^(@%^

On to the next link.
Not only do the patches not fix much but now they posted a link to a patch that installed all kinds of browser hijacks and adware to my computer. Thanks Luthier! The incredibar is a real pain to get rid of and I can't delete it from my registry. So now not only did you make me pay $60 for a game in Alpha testing, but now you've also made it so that I have to reinstall Windows again. How do they intend on releasing a sequel to this game? Aren't they using the same graphical engine? How do they even test a game with the stutters as bad as they are? Are they using some secret Russian computer that is built for the sole purpose of running this game at a smooth 60fps?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.