Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #221  
Old 02-11-2012, 03:53 PM
jamesdietz's Avatar
jamesdietz jamesdietz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Seattle,WashingtonUSA
Posts: 758
Default

I noticed the He-59 skin...are we going to get this bird at last ?
Screenshots fron a couple of years ago:



BTW - do we put these new skins in our Game /skins folder or are they only templates for skinners?
  #222  
Old 02-11-2012, 03:59 PM
LcSummers LcSummers is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 585
Default

Thanks B6 and Team for this update. Its great to see the hard work.

I must say i cant wait for the update wich hopefully eliminates stutters and increases performance.


S!
__________________
MSI 790FX-GD70
Win 7 64bit
AMD Phenom II 965BE 4 x 3.5Ghz
ASUS GTX 680 TOP
Corsair 16GB RAM
Thrustmaster Warthog Hotas
Saitek Pro Rudder
Track IR 5

SB Audigy 2 ZS
  #223  
Old 02-11-2012, 04:12 PM
icarus icarus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 323
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
First?

Well that depends, I would agree if the team members doing the AAA could be working on the bugs..

But based on what Luther said, that is not allays the case.

Therefore if the team members who did the AAA can not help in fixing the bugs, and have no aircraft oriented things to work on, than I think it is a good idea to have them doing the AAA as opposed to doing nothing at all.
Wow! I agree with your comment 100% and you still find a way to split haiirs in order to start an argument. Pathetic obsessed arguing deserves a ban.

I will clarify for those who need help. Replace "first" with ""as their first priority" T

Last edited by icarus; 02-11-2012 at 04:25 PM.
  #224  
Old 02-11-2012, 04:28 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus View Post
Wow! I agree with your comment 100%
S!

Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus View Post
and you still find a way to split haiirs in order to start an argument. Pathetic obsessed arguing deserves a ban.
Really?

So, pointing out the facts oh what Luither said with regards to fixing bugs is spliting hairs and starting an argument?

You do have a strange view of the CoD world IMHO..

May I make a recomendation that you put me on ignore? Because you allways seem to get upset with anything I say.
  #225  
Old 02-11-2012, 04:44 PM
Tavingon Tavingon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Stratford on Avon, England
Posts: 708
Default

More planes!
  #226  
Old 02-11-2012, 04:50 PM
icarus icarus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 323
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
S!


Really?

So, pointing out the facts oh what Luither said with regards to fixing bugs is spliting hairs and starting an argument?

You do have a strange view of the CoD world IMHO..

May I make a recomendation that you put me on ignore? Because you allways seem to get upset with anything I say.
Yes REALLY! Dude read my clarification. It explains why your quote is unnecessary and irrelevent:

I will clarify for you. Replace "first" with ""as their first priority" It does not mean they can't do anything else as long as their first priority is fixing the multiple major problems with CoD. Sheesh!
  #227  
Old 02-11-2012, 05:08 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus View Post
Yes REALLY! Dude read my clarification. It explains why your quote is unnecessary and irrelevent:

I will clarify for you. Replace "first" with ""as their first priority" It does not mean they can't do anything else as long as their first priority is fixing the multiple major problems with CoD. Sheesh!
Does anything give you the impression it's not their first priority?
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
  #228  
Old 02-11-2012, 05:11 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus View Post
Dude read my clarification. It explains why your quote is unnecessary and irrelevent:
Just to be clear, your clarification came after my initial response that you got so upset about.. Thus not relevant

As for my replies in response to your replies to me

It is quite simple..

Don't reply/respond to something I said if you are incapable of accepting my 'point of view' when I reply 'back' to you

Now since you refuse to put me on ignore..

And insist on trying to make this into something it is not..

Know that I for one am going to take the high road here and not muddy up this thread anymore by playing tit for tat with you in public..

From this point forward in this thread I will simply respond to you by saying 'see PM'

Will that make you happy?
  #229  
Old 02-11-2012, 05:12 PM
dcart dcart is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4
Default

In when the Sim's in the battle of England ? Lol !
In the battle of Moscow shall we have the possibility of interpreting the role of a Soviet farmer, his doubts and his fears at the approach of the period of the harvests?
  #230  
Old 02-11-2012, 05:27 PM
icarus icarus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 323
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Just to be clear, your clarification came after my initial response that you got so upset about.. Thus not relevant

As for my replies in response to your replies to me

It is quite simple..

Don't reply/respond to something I said if you are incapable of accepting my 'point of view' when I reply 'back' to you

Now since you refuse to put me on ignore..

And insist on trying to make this into something it is not..

Know that I for one am going to take the high road here and not muddy up this thread anymore by playing tit for tat with you in public..

From this point forward in this thread I will simply respond to you by saying 'see PM'

Will that make you happy?
Wow, I thought I was taking the high road agreeing with you 100%. Sorry for trying to agree with you and not arguing.

No do not PM me I do not want to take it to another level with you spamming my email with notifications.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.