Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #201  
Old 07-13-2009, 07:06 AM
Tree_UK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I would call it putting things in perpesctive, we can wait and wait, or try something new.
Reply With Quote
  #202  
Old 07-13-2009, 07:15 AM
Tree_UK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RCAF_FB_Orville View Post
I can understand the viewpoints of those saying WWI is not their thing.....Fair dinkum its not everybodys cup of tea. I do however find the ruminations of those who have not played it, yet seem to somehow be experts on the sim a bit confusing......And no I am no "Cheerleader". I wrote a small review on it over on Simhq (I post there under "Biggles07") I think began with "I'm a believer BUT", with both positives and negatives. Those opinions are pretty much the consensus at the moment. That said, I had been playing it only around 3-4 days at that point, since then I have had some great fun with the sim, despite its frustrations.

It is not in competition with SOW, room for both in this world and then some. 99% of those who bought ROF will buy SOW too, no doubt about it. Why all the bitching?

@KG26_Alpha "These idiots are kidding themselves."

Thanks for that mate, charmed. This "idiot" here is having a great time with the sim, cheers. Don't worry, though your comment struck me as somewhat ironically "idiotic" itself being that you have never met me.....though I'm not quite puerile or immature enough to return the favour.

That said Alpha, if British you are more than welcome to attend Newcastles Cruddas park community centre boxing gym on wednesday nights and call me an "idiot" then.......I'm a middleweight so PM me if your interested. Relax, its just sport! Funny how the insults flow on computers isn't it? Aye, whatever Bonny lad, lmao .


@Tree, theres a new vid up on YT which you can find on the Simhq ROF page of the British SE5a coming soon......looking good. If that doesn't get yer in the "Tally Ho" Spirit then nothing will hehe.

Cheers.
Thanks buddy i will check it out, I dont think you will get many takers for a good old 'punch up' on here though. This is really a fan site so anything that threatens Oleg normally gets toasted both sides by the usual suspects.
Reply With Quote
  #203  
Old 07-13-2009, 08:32 AM
proton45's Avatar
proton45 proton45 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 651
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK View Post
I would call it putting things in perpesctive, we can wait and wait, or try something new.

As it stands "ROF" doesn't offer enough for me (right now) to try it... and "I'm" not willing to hedge my bets on speculating what kind of (and how many) "free"(?) up-dates "ROF" may offer.

Last edited by proton45; 07-13-2009 at 10:23 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #204  
Old 07-13-2009, 09:26 AM
KG26_Alpha KG26_Alpha is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,805
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RCAF_FB_Orville View Post
I can understand the viewpoints of those saying WWI is not their thing.....Fair dinkum its not everybodys cup of tea. I do however find the ruminations of those who have not played it, yet seem to somehow be experts on the sim a bit confusing......And no I am no "Cheerleader". I wrote a small review on it over on Simhq (I post there under "Biggles07") I think began with "I'm a believer BUT", with both positives and negatives. Those opinions are pretty much the consensus at the moment. That said, I had been playing it only around 3-4 days at that point, since then I have had some great fun with the sim, despite its frustrations.

It is not in competition with SOW, room for both in this world and then some. 99% of those who bought ROF will buy SOW too, no doubt about it. Why all the bitching?

@KG26_Alpha "These idiots are kidding themselves."

Thanks for that mate, charmed. This "idiot" here is having a great time with the sim, cheers. Don't worry, though your comment struck me as somewhat ironically "idiotic" itself being that you have never met me.....though I'm not quite puerile or immature enough to return the favour.

That said Alpha, if British you are more than welcome to attend Newcastles Cruddas park community centre boxing gym on wednesday nights and call me an "idiot" then.......I'm a middleweight so PM me if your interested. Relax, its just sport! Funny how the insults flow on computers isn't it? Aye, whatever Bonny lad, lmao .



@Tree, theres a new vid up on YT which you can find on the Simhq ROF page of the British SE5a coming soon......looking good. If that doesn't get yer in the "Tally Ho" Spirit then nothing will hehe.

Cheers.
Confirmed.................... Idiot.

Reply With Quote
  #205  
Old 07-13-2009, 09:56 AM
hiro hiro is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 352
Default My ROF post

LOL



I can't run it on my PC so my friend had to help me out.

he has a quad w/ 2.66 ghz pc.


I'm using my Microsoft 'new OS' approach.

1. wait and see the damage.
2. wait for a patchable or version that runs reliably.
3. wait and see the non MS support community behind it + extra apps.
4. buy, patch, and install (for this game, i'd be play).


I'm going to wait on ROF.

why?

short version:

DRM turns me off esp w/ better DRM methods out there.

ROF bugs are big. They forgot Rule #3 of game fight club. release beta = betamaxed. Don't release beta. (rule 1 n 2 talk about the game club to everyone). Still though pest control (patience + beating up a pillow / punching bag) will work. Somtimes.

ROF content is low. I feel like I just bought a box of my favorite ceral, opened the box, split the plastic bag's top and find it half full. And 5 crunch berries, when the picture has half of it berries and cereal.

However the modeling, physics and eye candy (graphics) is good so if they fix it, its worth it, so I will wait.


Support the flight sim devs, yes. This is why I will get a 2nd copy of IL-2 for backup (one DVD will travel). But support a product that was rushed through QA? This happens more than it should for the video game community. And lower expectations of intended audience is partly to blame.




long version:






first the good:

Gorgeous graphics, excellent physics, and realistic WW I flying. Yes you can crash (planes) just cuz. Wind blows too strong, smack. Squirrelly movements check.

then the bad:

1. the DRM thing. I buy my games. I don't want to be penalized because of some pirate paranoia. Look at Microsoft, they've been fighting pirates and ninjas and you can torrent a modded Vista that runs smoother than a trimmed Pony. Millions and months spent on DRM that the electronic army of hackers undoes in a day. I d/l games to test to see if I like and if I like I buy it. If I don't like it gets erased.

(I'm going to buy backup copy of IL-2 46 dvd). There are so many user friendly ways to implement DRM and they went the hardline. So I'll wait until a good patch / hack / mod / DRM method switch happens.


2. Bugs. I am tired of being punked by game dev companies. Like Age Of Conan ( more like age of crash on). First my friend said registering Rise was a challenge (waiting to time out, then retry etc), and he's tech savvy. On my ROF play, got CTD once, and locked up several times, looked for online connection.

And my friend has solid internet (he plays MMO's and FPS hard core.)

We tried selecting a plane and it says cant access it, then we back out to main menu and back in and NOW can select it.

I'm ok with the funky voice acting, but during a mission when the game quits and blacks out, then you're greeted by your desktop and flash of a window some error message that appears and disappears in the same instant . . .

The fight for good quality continues. I will not be betamaxed and waste $$ and time on something that should have been QA'd properly. And this is basic to any product.


3. loading like playstation. Ok his rig is powerful. It can run 3 instances of Left 4 Dead, two Lord of the Rings online's and run in desktop or in either games as if no thing else is being ran.

He can even render Lightwave style while playing Left 4 Dead (1 instance).

We had some laughs, were waiting for ROF to load, and he switched to Left 4, played a bit, went to check ROF, loading


4. Weak sauce content. 2 planes? Ok, they're trying the Valve angle / Blizzard Starcraft 2 model. Release a 3rd of the game, then more. Ok. But Valve and Blizz are industry heavy hitters and neoqb's the new kid on the block (does neoqb rhym with n00b? ). Valve and Blizzard can make this call given their position.

2 planes and some missions doesn't have the scope of the theater they're trying to represent.

5. buying new planes. I could support this, but being stingy with only 2 planes upon release means they're out for $$. I was laughing at the post on the ubi forums where someone said if this was IL-2, it would have only IL-2 and ME-109 to play lol.

And only 2 planes harkens to this japanese 8 bit ww2 sim where you could fly a cream yellow or green zero or something that looked like a mustang in USN hellcat colors. it was from arcade tail end 3rd person view perspective and you could bomb, torpedo, and shoot at incoming planes ships etc. But thats cuz memory was premium, 8 bit gaming was new frontier.

But this is 09, variety is the spice of life. And IL-2 has raised the standards.

Give something more than 5 planes each side. And more missions, heck maybe even one bomber biplane and missions like that. I don't care if its old school where a gunner uses a modified sextant to aim, picks up a bomb from the basket, and arms the bomb and holds it over the side.

I'm waiting for the 10 planes for $10 sale! It seems they know how rare WW I sims are so they're milking it.

6. The ubi forms post has lots of posts w/ a near fanatical fanboy ism of this game. I'd think lots of people would be wanting this game due to the starving nature of WW I sim and the rarity of good sims of that era.

I notice here, like ubi, flaws of the game and neoqb's shortcomings are overlooked because of the eye candy graphics, the 'ohhh and ahhhh' of a flight sim and the accurate flight model. But ROF has the bugs, the issues, the lack of content, lots of missing qualities from stellar games that should've been there from the start.

Ok, I can understand beggars can't be choosers right? A hungry man's gotta eat? And if your diet is only WW I sims . . . when anything edible shows up, bon appetit, even if its a rat burger (demolition man anyone?). But like Ash, I choose you IL-Two!


Support the sim community. Yes, if product is good. But I don't think so, if its not. I mean, if you buy a buggy product, you are telling the manufacturer you're willing to take something less than the top notch quality we all deserve.

Forget all the doomsaying Flight Sims are dying. IL-2 is just as popular. 7 years and you can still find a strong community going for that. Only games I know of with that longevity are a few MMO's (Asheron's Call) and classics like Nintendo's on its Wii.

Alot of the posts praising ROF seem to be skewed by the lack of good WW I flight sims, heck even WW I sims period (ya it hurts we can count them on our fingers since x86 days) so once one comes up, with graphics and decent flight model its "next best thing since sliced bread" despite the shortcomings.

Ahh, takes more than just eye candy to sell me.

But at least none of the issues are what I would call game breaking. Game hesitant to buy, yes.


So I'll wait for more content, patches to fix the bugs, and hacks / replacement of the DRM.

Plus I have to build a PC, and that takes time cuz I'm going CH for IL-2 first.

See . . . but what if BOB SOW comes out. And also I'm waiting on Starcraft 2, and Mass Effect 2. ROF could slip under the radar . . .


lol


Last edited by hiro; 07-13-2009 at 10:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #206  
Old 07-13-2009, 11:18 AM
RCAF_FB_Orville RCAF_FB_Orville is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
Posts: 341
Default

@Alpha....Hahahaha, confirmed......Bigmouthed Wuss
Reply With Quote
  #207  
Old 07-13-2009, 12:00 PM
Tree_UK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by proton45 View Post
As it stands "ROF" doesn't offer enough for me (right now) to try it... and "I'm" not willing to hedge my bets on speculating what kind of (and how many) "free"(?) up-dates "ROF" may offer.
To be honest i am not a big fan of first world war sims fullstop. However ROF does look very good and the support seems to be there, i am not concerned about paying a few quid for add-ons that is to be expected these days, and i am getting very tempted by ROF, at least its something new to fly about in.
Reply With Quote
  #208  
Old 07-14-2009, 07:53 AM
virre89 virre89 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hiro View Post
LOL



I can't run it on my PC so my friend had to help me out.

he has a quad w/ 2.66 ghz pc.


I'm using my Microsoft 'new OS' approach.

1. wait and see the damage.
2. wait for a patchable or version that runs reliably.
3. wait and see the non MS support community behind it + extra apps.
4. buy, patch, and install (for this game, i'd be play).


I'm going to wait on ROF.

why?

short version:

DRM turns me off esp w/ better DRM methods out there.

ROF bugs are big. They forgot Rule #3 of game fight club. release beta = betamaxed. Don't release beta. (rule 1 n 2 talk about the game club to everyone). Still though pest control (patience + beating up a pillow / punching bag) will work. Somtimes.

ROF content is low. I feel like I just bought a box of my favorite ceral, opened the box, split the plastic bag's top and find it half full. And 5 crunch berries, when the picture has half of it berries and cereal.

However the modeling, physics and eye candy (graphics) is good so if they fix it, its worth it, so I will wait.


Support the flight sim devs, yes. This is why I will get a 2nd copy of IL-2 for backup (one DVD will travel). But support a product that was rushed through QA? This happens more than it should for the video game community. And lower expectations of intended audience is partly to blame.




long version:






first the good:

Gorgeous graphics, excellent physics, and realistic WW I flying. Yes you can crash (planes) just cuz. Wind blows too strong, smack. Squirrelly movements check.

then the bad:

1. the DRM thing. I buy my games. I don't want to be penalized because of some pirate paranoia. Look at Microsoft, they've been fighting pirates and ninjas and you can torrent a modded Vista that runs smoother than a trimmed Pony. Millions and months spent on DRM that the electronic army of hackers undoes in a day. I d/l games to test to see if I like and if I like I buy it. If I don't like it gets erased.

(I'm going to buy backup copy of IL-2 46 dvd). There are so many user friendly ways to implement DRM and they went the hardline. So I'll wait until a good patch / hack / mod / DRM method switch happens.


2. Bugs. I am tired of being punked by game dev companies. Like Age Of Conan ( more like age of crash on). First my friend said registering Rise was a challenge (waiting to time out, then retry etc), and he's tech savvy. On my ROF play, got CTD once, and locked up several times, looked for online connection.

And my friend has solid internet (he plays MMO's and FPS hard core.)

We tried selecting a plane and it says cant access it, then we back out to main menu and back in and NOW can select it.

I'm ok with the funky voice acting, but during a mission when the game quits and blacks out, then you're greeted by your desktop and flash of a window some error message that appears and disappears in the same instant . . .

The fight for good quality continues. I will not be betamaxed and waste $$ and time on something that should have been QA'd properly. And this is basic to any product.


3. loading like playstation. Ok his rig is powerful. It can run 3 instances of Left 4 Dead, two Lord of the Rings online's and run in desktop or in either games as if no thing else is being ran.

He can even render Lightwave style while playing Left 4 Dead (1 instance).

We had some laughs, were waiting for ROF to load, and he switched to Left 4, played a bit, went to check ROF, loading


4. Weak sauce content. 2 planes? Ok, they're trying the Valve angle / Blizzard Starcraft 2 model. Release a 3rd of the game, then more. Ok. But Valve and Blizz are industry heavy hitters and neoqb's the new kid on the block (does neoqb rhym with n00b? ). Valve and Blizzard can make this call given their position.

2 planes and some missions doesn't have the scope of the theater they're trying to represent.

5. buying new planes. I could support this, but being stingy with only 2 planes upon release means they're out for $$. I was laughing at the post on the ubi forums where someone said if this was IL-2, it would have only IL-2 and ME-109 to play lol.

And only 2 planes harkens to this japanese 8 bit ww2 sim where you could fly a cream yellow or green zero or something that looked like a mustang in USN hellcat colors. it was from arcade tail end 3rd person view perspective and you could bomb, torpedo, and shoot at incoming planes ships etc. But thats cuz memory was premium, 8 bit gaming was new frontier.

But this is 09, variety is the spice of life. And IL-2 has raised the standards.

Give something more than 5 planes each side. And more missions, heck maybe even one bomber biplane and missions like that. I don't care if its old school where a gunner uses a modified sextant to aim, picks up a bomb from the basket, and arms the bomb and holds it over the side.

I'm waiting for the 10 planes for $10 sale! It seems they know how rare WW I sims are so they're milking it.

6. The ubi forms post has lots of posts w/ a near fanatical fanboy ism of this game. I'd think lots of people would be wanting this game due to the starving nature of WW I sim and the rarity of good sims of that era.

I notice here, like ubi, flaws of the game and neoqb's shortcomings are overlooked because of the eye candy graphics, the 'ohhh and ahhhh' of a flight sim and the accurate flight model. But ROF has the bugs, the issues, the lack of content, lots of missing qualities from stellar games that should've been there from the start.

Ok, I can understand beggars can't be choosers right? A hungry man's gotta eat? And if your diet is only WW I sims . . . when anything edible shows up, bon appetit, even if its a rat burger (demolition man anyone?). But like Ash, I choose you IL-Two!


Support the sim community. Yes, if product is good. But I don't think so, if its not. I mean, if you buy a buggy product, you are telling the manufacturer you're willing to take something less than the top notch quality we all deserve.

Forget all the doomsaying Flight Sims are dying. IL-2 is just as popular. 7 years and you can still find a strong community going for that. Only games I know of with that longevity are a few MMO's (Asheron's Call) and classics like Nintendo's on its Wii.

Alot of the posts praising ROF seem to be skewed by the lack of good WW I flight sims, heck even WW I sims period (ya it hurts we can count them on our fingers since x86 days) so once one comes up, with graphics and decent flight model its "next best thing since sliced bread" despite the shortcomings.

Ahh, takes more than just eye candy to sell me.

But at least none of the issues are what I would call game breaking. Game hesitant to buy, yes.


So I'll wait for more content, patches to fix the bugs, and hacks / replacement of the DRM.

Plus I have to build a PC, and that takes time cuz I'm going CH for IL-2 first.

See . . . but what if BOB SOW comes out. And also I'm waiting on Starcraft 2, and Mass Effect 2. ROF could slip under the radar . . .


lol


Last edited by virre89; 07-14-2009 at 07:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #209  
Old 07-16-2009, 07:49 AM
Tvrdi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default lick it

SE.5



Pfalz D.IIIa





Reply With Quote
  #210  
Old 07-16-2009, 10:41 AM
Feuerfalke Feuerfalke is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,350
Default

Neobq also added the D.5 Ablatros, the Nieuport 28 for free.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.