Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-30-2012, 11:06 PM
raaaid's Avatar
raaaid raaaid is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,329
Default

well statistics are pretty crazy i found the flaw

i left the computer just half hour calculating, when i returned from a coffe in the bar i assumed it would be the right result but leaving it 3 hours gave out number 221 appears every 1000 digits as it should

hell computers are stone age, so slow
__________________
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e222/raaaid/fmkld-1.jpg2.4ghz dual core cpu
3gb ram
ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2

I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-30-2012, 11:48 PM
MadBlaster MadBlaster is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTE_Galway View Post
Actually you are both wrong.

For example, given a set of real numbers {1,2,3 ... 10000}

The string 123 occurs 11 times {123, 1123, 1230, 2123, 3123, 4123, 5123, 6123, 7123, 8123, 9123} as does the string 223 {223, 1223, 2223, 2230, 3223, 4223, 5223, 6223, 7223, 8223, 9223}.

Thus the probability is 1:1000 for 1000 real numbers but 11:10,000 for 10,000 real numbers.

The probability changes with sample size, getting larger as the set of reals being sampled gets larger.

You need to work out probabilities for a population rather than a sample.

You can of course manipulate the sample size to get aberrant results. For example the set of reals {1,2,3 ... 1200} has two elements containing the string 123 and only one element containing the string 223. This results from ad hoc manipulation of set size to get the results you want.

We should leave that sort of non-scientific ad hoc data manipulation to conspiracy theorists and climate change deniers
Correction. Your set {1,2,3 ... 10000} is actually a finite subset of Natural Numbers. Moreover, your subset excludes zero, but your derivations include zero??? Keep drinking the Kool-Aid son of Al Gore. Btw, it has recently been reported that the manpig got a D in the natural sciences class!

edit:
Well, I'll cut some slack about the zero. But raaaids function a= Math.GetRandomNumber(10) does it generate 0-9 or 1-10? I'm assuming 0-9.

Last edited by MadBlaster; 05-01-2012 at 12:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.