Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-27-2012, 07:09 PM
Pudfark Pudfark is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 363
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LUD View Post
Fully support this, but I am more radical, i would lock the future official updates, if we ever have any more....

Comments could still be made in the pilots lounge. The people looking for useful information would lose nothing with respect to the current situation, as it would be the same pain to find something worth in the pile of bs, but at least we could save to the developers (and to some of us the shame) the sad spectacle of seeing some insolent answers we have seen today.

Sorry if I hurt someone, but imo we aren't yet as a whole mature enough to receive updates, much less to receive "interactive ones".
I agree completely...ROF...









(read only format)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-27-2012, 07:31 PM
LcSummers LcSummers is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 585
Default

Yeah this would be nice +1
__________________
MSI 790FX-GD70
Win 7 64bit
AMD Phenom II 965BE 4 x 3.5Ghz
ASUS GTX 680 TOP
Corsair 16GB RAM
Thrustmaster Warthog Hotas
Saitek Pro Rudder
Track IR 5

SB Audigy 2 ZS
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-28-2012, 03:11 AM
jcenzano's Avatar
jcenzano jcenzano is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Spain
Posts: 159
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LUD View Post
Fully support this, but I am more radical, i would lock the future official updates, if we ever have any more....

Comments could still be made in the pilots lounge. The people looking for useful information would lose nothing with respect to the current situation, as it would be the same pain to find something worth in the pile of bs, but at least we could save to the developers (and to some of us the shame) the sad spectacle of seeing some insolent answers we have seen today.

Sorry if I hurt someone, but imo we aren't yet as a whole mature enough to receive updates, much less to receive "interactive ones".
+1
__________________
Intel i7-2600K // Asus Maximus IV Extreme Rev3 // 2xGTX580-3GB (SLI'ed when able) // 16 GB DDR3 // SSD // HDD WD 10K // Win7 x64 // LG monitor 24´´ 1920x1200 res
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-28-2012, 06:30 AM
theOden theOden is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Sweden
Posts: 221
Default

I'm not sure I understand the goal here.

All cheers and happiness in the update thread and all critizism and the unhappy customers in a seperate thread held away in some sub forum to to be seen by potentially new customers?

Will possibly "sensible" posts be screened by you and then, if approved, moved up to the update thread?

If this one doesn't remind me of news from East Germany and Soviet Russia back when I was young, I guess nothing would.

Feel free to censor me, I'm starting to get the picture how things are done in here. Seen how people like Tree and furbs putting up hard questions aren't getting answered but rather moderated away this suggestion of post #1 would not surprise me to be seen put into action.

Maybe extend the forum beyond "moderator" and denote some memebers as "Political Commisar", like Klem and maybe that odd Ace-man?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-28-2012, 07:08 AM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by theOden View Post
I'm not sure I understand the goal here.

All cheers and happiness in the update thread and all critizism and the unhappy customers in a seperate thread held away in some sub forum to to be seen by potentially new customers?

Will possibly "sensible" posts be screened by you and then, if approved, moved up to the update thread?

If this one doesn't remind me of news from East Germany and Soviet Russia back when I was young, I guess nothing would.

Feel free to censor me, I'm starting to get the picture how things are done in here. Seen how people like Tree and furbs putting up hard questions aren't getting answered but rather moderated away this suggestion of post #1 would not surprise me to be seen put into action.

Maybe extend the forum beyond "moderator" and denote some memebers as "Political Commisar", like Klem and maybe that odd Ace-man?
The goal is to obtain clear information from the developers and to provide the opportunity to ask or to see clear questions specifically on the update information and find the devs answers.

There are no sinister intentions here. Don't confuse suppressive censorship with trying to keep important Threads meaningful, on topic and free of Trolls.

I am a forum user just like you but I get sick of wading through a pile of vitriol and often childish arguments when what I want from an update thread is to easily find the information it gives and to see relevant questions and answers. There are plenty of threads where people can argue themselves blue in the face and hurl insults at eachother if they want.

I think you must see that many posts in the last update thread were just a battle of personalised vitriol and repeated complaints that we've all seen so many times before and that do not specifically reference the update information. Its not that some of the complaints aren't valid and I understand that more recent purchasers of CoD will want to come here and register their point of view but that isn't what the update threads are for. Do we really have to wade through all of that every time to find the useful information? My suggestion is simply that certain Threads be given a special status that keeps them useful.

As for members that get a ban, some of them seem to enjoy only being deliberately and boringly provocative on the same old subjects, again and again and again and again, questions that have already been answered, again and again and again. It reduces them to Trolls and personally I'm glad the moderators are taking a stronger line. I come here to find useful information and help if I can, not to wade through a pile of nonsense that wouldn't be tolerated in a kids classroom.
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-28-2012, 09:24 AM
zapatista's Avatar
zapatista zapatista is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by theOden View Post
Seen how people like Tree and furbs putting up hard questions aren't getting answered but rather moderated away this suggestion of post #1 would not surprise me to be seen put into action.
you'r making a major error if you are trying to hold up tree as an example of anything good in this forum in the last few years. for anybody who has seen him in action here over the last few years ( presming the observer has an IQ over 100), tree was the extreme example of a petulant perpetual whiner who's sole purpose was to put a negative slant on everything, and he did so frequently and with the sole aim to deliberatly misrepresenting facts and mislead people

aside from that lapse in your reference material, i'd agree with your main point: strictly censoring posters to try and remove people reporting problems is no solution.

some of the old timer posters in this thread seem to have a short memory however. previous moderators when dealing with similar problems already repeatedly stated that (unless outright flame wars) they stop reading the thread for feedback after the first few pages

we've been there before folks. those ignoring history are doomed to repeat it, err, who said that again ?
__________________
President Dwight D. Eisenhower 1953: Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone, it is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-27-2012, 07:59 PM
jimbop jimbop is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,064
Default

+1

A related discussion thread will no doubt start within a nanosecond but the actual information and relevant responses would be easy to find.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-27-2012, 10:07 PM
Hood Hood is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 318
Default

Hehe my own suggestion about such a locked update thread led to 60 deleted posts and it being locked.

It's the way to go.

Hood
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-28-2012, 02:54 AM
Force10 Force10 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 371
Default

I would think that a seperation of COD and BOM would be helpful at some point. If the new pics of the BOM planes were in a seperate thread from the Dev update for COD, there would be less wading through OT stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-29-2012, 12:29 AM
jimbop jimbop is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,064
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ribbs67 View Post
Sorry 6BL Birddog.... That im requsting this right after your post.. but while were on the topic of keeping the update thread clean, I wish we could get rid of all the "quoted" + 1... And +100000 posts also. I find them very redundant, and not needed. I feel like they clog up the thread just as much as the Trolling thats going on.
+1

Sorry, couldn't resist!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.