A new article in SimHQ about Cod

[icarus]

Originally Posted by cheesehawk

haha, you know, I originally thought, "This article is like one of Tree's posts, but better written!"

That would make Tree_UK right then, because the article is bang on.

[icarus]

Originally Posted by cheesehawk

Yes, but irrelevant in terms of how the game is running atm.

No, its some of the reasons why it runs this way at the moment and why it shouldn't have been released that way. And how it affects the likelyhood of a good outcome. Highly relevant.

[Tiger27]

Originally Posted by Tree_UK

The strange thing is that I posted similar thoughts to Tom on the SimHQ website and got myself a life time ban!!

Tree, if this was really similar to what you had been posting over at SimHQ we would all be forced to read this review in every thread everyday for the next six weeks, I think they banned you to save the sanity of the rest of us

[SsSsSsSsSnake]

Originally Posted by Tree_UK

The strange thing is that I posted similar thoughts to Tom on the SimHQ website and got myself a life time ban!!

i wondered why you hadnt posted for some time in simhq

Originally Posted by SsSsSsSsSnake

i wondered why you hadnt posted for some time in simhq

lol, yes its been a while, the mad thing is that noone even noticed the post i got banned for, even one of the mods contacted me and said he couldn't believe I had been banned for such a post.

[Kongo-Otto]

Originally Posted by Tree_UK

The strange thing is that I posted similar thoughts to Tom on the SimHQ website and got myself a life time ban!!

Quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi or in english: "Gods may do what cattle may not"

[Strike]

Originally Posted by Kongo-Otto

Quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi or in english: "Gods may do what cattle may not"

you calling tree a cow? A cow lacks 999999999999999999,999% of the necessary vocabulary to say what tree says, besides the cow cannot compare software products to cars or burgers, nor communicate in an underlying tone that he is genuinely feeling sorely ripped off.

I agree the launch of IL-2 CloD has been nothing but FUBAR. Still, I've paid money for it, I've played it 10 times more than Crysis which I bought at a similar price some years ago. Yet crysis is gaming "perfection" in both graphics and gameplay, and IL-2 is so flawed it's bittersweet to play it. It's like "Man, I just have to play some IL-2 CloD! It's so awesome!" Then a few minutes in : "Holy Cow, this is so flawed, it's hard to keep playing" So I've been on and off playing it for over 100 hrs. I totally must have alzheimers.

All in all, it's fun playing it, imagining how it will be when it's fixed. Just like you imagine how it's to play, when watching trailers.

[pupo162]

preatty much my opinion too.

they had a good chance to make a good start and they blew it.

They will fix the game eventually but they will never recover from the bad start....

[d0o0m]

Originally Posted by pupo162

preatty much my opinion too.

they had a good chance to make a good start and they blew it.

They will fix the game eventually but they will never recover from the bad start....

not true - developers do recover.... look at WWIIOL, probably the worst launch in history and still around looking absolutely nothing like it did in 2001.
I will guarantee the WWIIOL team was smaller than the COD team on many orders.

[youtube]

[M1sF1rE]

Originally Posted by 6S.Tamat

It is "a little bit" critical..

http://www.simhq.com/_air13/air_499a.html

It should be critical. It's a heaping mess as is.