Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-14-2010, 04:19 PM
Furio's Avatar
Furio Furio is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 299
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sternjaeger View Post
imagine the wonderful noise, heat and smell of cordite in there

Imagine doing that while performing high g manoeuvring!
If I’m not mistaken, the same system was employed on early Ju88 night fighters.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-14-2010, 04:22 PM
Sven Sven is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: The Netherlands, Zeeland
Posts: 787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sternjaeger View Post
imagine the wonderful noise, heat and smell of cordite in there
If you think hard enough you'll smell it too! Lovely

Just a side-question, I didn't know the barrels of the 110's cannons were that long , the bullet must have had a higher velocity than lets say a 109's nose cannon, is that modelled in IL2, if not, I hope that will be modelled in SoWBoB, that is if my theory is right

Sven
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-14-2010, 06:21 PM
winny winny is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 1,508
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven View Post
If you think hard enough you'll smell it too! Lovely

Just a side-question, I didn't know the barrels of the 110's cannons were that long , the bullet must have had a higher velocity than lets say a 109's nose cannon, is that modelled in IL2, if not, I hope that will be modelled in SoWBoB, that is if my theory is right

Sven
I'm pulling this from memory so I could be wrong (I'm sure someone will let us know!)...

I think the 20mm in the 110 was the same as the ones fitted to 109's. ie. the MGFF. At least till 1941, where they switched them over to the MG151 20mm.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-14-2010, 06:52 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

the barrels of the MG-FF/M ended long before the holes in the nose, they ended ~ below the pilot seat ! the shells had to "fly" through over-caliber tubes.

this was also the case with nose fitted Mg151 and MK108 in the later 109 series !
the barrels for sure not ended in the spinner hole

and yes, the Bf110C,D,E,F had the same canons as the Bf109E.
C-1,-2 had MG-FF, from C-3 on MG-FF/M. Exception was the C-6 with a MK101 30mm instead of the two 20mm...........
From 110G the 20mm were MG151/20 belt fed.

and true about the Beaufighter Mk.I , but it will be not flyable, only AI, in the first release AFAIK
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-14-2010, 06:53 PM
TinyTim TinyTim is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 98
Default

The barrel wasn't any longer, it was an ordinary MG-FF. Just like the barrel of the MK108 on the Bf 109 didn't extend all the way from the cannon to the end of the spinner, it was much shorter. Blast tube of 5cm radius was installed from the end of the cannon barrel through the engine and through the spinner. The case was the same on the Bf 110.

EDIT: Franky beat me to it
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-14-2010, 08:17 PM
Igo kyu's Avatar
Igo kyu Igo kyu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 703
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG53Frankyboy View Post
the barrels of the MG-FF/M ended long before the holes in the nose, they ended ~ below the pilot seat ! the shells had to "fly" through over-caliber tubes.(
That means, if you fired at high g, you could hit the inside of the blast tubes! I wonder whether any aircraft were damaged or lost that way?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-14-2010, 08:22 PM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

i think they saved the heavy guns for acccurate shooting, for high g deflection shooting the 4 mg17 should been enough
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects

Last edited by robtek; 12-14-2010 at 08:22 PM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-15-2010, 05:39 AM
KnightFandragon KnightFandragon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: KRL HQ, Ontario Canada
Posts: 740
Default

Will bombers be able to reload in flight period in SoW? Its kinda annoying now to be flying in a bomber, run out of ammo, look around, see Ammo boxes sitting around and cant use them. Im sure crews went up with extra ammo right?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-15-2010, 09:04 AM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KnightFandragon View Post
Will bombers be able to reload in flight period in SoW? Its kinda annoying now to be flying in a bomber, run out of ammo, look around, see Ammo boxes sitting around and cant use them. Im sure crews went up with extra ammo right?
IIRC we already saw a Moskau Show video where the the drumchange of a Ju87s MG15 was animated
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-15-2010, 12:03 PM
TinyTim TinyTim is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 98
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Igo kyu View Post
That means, if you fired at high g, you could hit the inside of the blast tubes! I wonder whether any aircraft were damaged or lost that way?
That's impossible because the g value for something like this to occur is far too high.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.