Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #181  
Old 04-06-2011, 06:25 PM
bw_wolverine's Avatar
bw_wolverine bw_wolverine is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 622
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eizon View Post
Aside from some of the screenshots on MAX where the plane is parked on the grass by some pretty trees, which do look great...

The game looks to me (cockpits aside) worse than Wings of Prey. That is to say, unless you're literally parked on the ground, I'd say that WoP looks better and runs probably 15 times as smoothly.

If only 1C could get the resources in that whoever made WoP had. They clearly know much better what they're doing when it comes to making a rendering engine.
Here's my take on it:

Rendering engines don't exist on their own. There's also a game that needs to be run somewhere in there too.

I think if CoD was running the same simulation/collision detection/damage modelling/etc etc etc that WoP does, the rendering engine could have certainly been made to do more and do it more smoothly. And then it would only be artistic choices that make the differences.

I think if the WoP people had a priority on making their game do the same content as CoD, they would have had to compromise their rendering as well. That's just the way it works.

So while it's perfectly alright to think that WoP looks better in whatever way, I think it's wrong to think that you could just shove their rendering techniques/engine into CoD and 'fix' it. It would probably encounter the very same problems CoD is having right now.

The WoP people made their choice: Graphics over gameplay. CoD went the other way.

That said, I still think CoD looks beautiful. Especially compared with other games of its type and by that I mean true simulations. FSX or BoB2:WoV or Rise of Flight or DCS sims or what have you. These are the titles that will show you what is possible graphically when making a SIM. Comparing the graphics of WoP to CoD is like comparing the graphics of Crysis 2 to Arma 2. If you want Arma2, you can't have graphics like Crysis 2. It just ain't happening. Not yet. Arma 2 still looks great, but it's restricted in how great it can look by all the other stuff it's doing that a game like Crysis 2 doesn't do.

HAWX looks pretty good too, but if HAWX had huge maps, a complex damage model and flight model, large view distances, and complex AI, it would be ahead of its time just like CoD is.

As for remarks about sim stuff being CPU and graphics stuff being GPU, that's all well and good IF they operated independantly. I don't think they do. These are moving objects in a simulation. Before a renderer can do that kind of work, it needs the information that's being processed by the simulation. Take for example the simple rendering of a bullet hole on a wing.

Before the renderer can display the appropriate image on your screen, the sim has to decide if the bullet hit your wing, where did it hit exactly, what damage was done by the bullet and needs to be displayed etc. CoD uses some pretty complex decisions for all that stuff. The renderer may be blisteringly fast, but it can only work with the information that the Cpu gives it. WoP I think is pretty simple in these kinds of matters, so it gets the data to the gpu faster and the gpu can render the scene faster as a result.

That's what I believe anyway. Since CoD looks better than any WWII Battle of Britain sim I know of, I'm not complaining at all. It can only get better from here.

Last edited by bw_wolverine; 04-06-2011 at 06:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #182  
Old 04-06-2011, 06:26 PM
kristorf's Avatar
kristorf kristorf is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Milton Keynes, England
Posts: 897
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Friendly_flyer View Post
I see you are at it again. Very nice work!
Couldn't resist
__________________
Regards

Chris



http://www.aircombatgroup.co.uk/index.php





Gigabyte z77-d3h, Intel Core i5-3570K 3.40GHz (OC 4.2GHz), Corsair Vengeance Low Profile 24GB DDR3 PC3-12800C9 1600MHz Dual Channel Kit , Samsung 120GB SSD 840 SATA 6Gb/s Basic, Seagate Barracuda 7200RPM 1TB SATA 6Gb/s 64MB, Cooling Silencer Mk II 750W '80 Plus Silver' PSU,
GTX580 3gb OC
Reply With Quote
  #183  
Old 04-06-2011, 07:17 PM
Fliegenpilz Fliegenpilz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 21
Default

This game is not only beautiful, it is truly stunning!

Look at some trees and grass for a while... notice that there isn't only a constant breeze - every now and again a strong wind comes up! I actually shivvered!

Well, here is a little experiment I made: Two screenshots, merged into one for a 3D effect (Cross-Eye-skills required! )

I want to play it like that RIGHT NOW!!!

Reply With Quote
  #184  
Old 04-06-2011, 08:14 PM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default







__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
Reply With Quote
  #185  
Old 04-06-2011, 08:28 PM
Strike Strike is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 684
Default



I found that setting a 150 yd convergence on the spit landed me some crazy results in a turnfight with 109. This is from a 2 second burst showing 334 hits (according to stats) which killed the pilot and I'm pretty sure it knocked out a lot of systems. Engine escaped unharmed though Saved that one for the ocean

Gotta say, I admire the damage details
Reply With Quote
  #186  
Old 04-06-2011, 09:09 PM
Sauf Sauf is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 436
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kristorf View Post
Couldn't resist
Glad to see you back at work Kristof, beautiful work! Cant wait to see what you can do with the Emil.

ps, are you hosting any skins on a site?
Reply With Quote
  #187  
Old 04-06-2011, 09:26 PM
jibo jibo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Paris
Posts: 230
Default

the 150y convergence was used by some pilots against bombers (check spitfire ace series on youtube)
Reply With Quote
  #188  
Old 04-06-2011, 11:04 PM
Ailantd's Avatar
Ailantd Ailantd is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 290
Default





Reply With Quote
  #189  
Old 04-06-2011, 11:14 PM
wildone_106 wildone_106 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle
Posts: 80
Default

I was kinda expecting the terrain to look as good as this, which is also a sim..

http://www.wingsofhonour.com/news/20...80x800x32b.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #190  
Old 04-06-2011, 11:21 PM
utu utu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 52
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wildone_106 View Post
I was kinda expecting the terrain to look as good as this, which is also a sim..

http://www.wingsofhonour.com/news/20...80x800x32b.jpg
the trees and other objects on ROF terrain don't have shadows
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.