![]() |
#151
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
f6f hellcat is a cool name
|
#152
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vickers Valient has a ring to it.
|
#153
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hmm cool aircraft name
f86 sabre or F4 phantom |
#154
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Both the Hurricane and Spitfire had something that the Yak and the LaGG didn't have..... armour plating behind the pilot's seat and a firewall between the cockpit and the fuel tank.
The I-i53 ahd a terrible reputation for the airflow blowing through the undercarriage well turning the cockpit into a blast furnace when the non-self sealing or armoured fuel tanks caught fire. It is because of this that Soviet pilots never felw with the canopy cover ftted, as they needed to escape in a hurry when hit. |
#155
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#156
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Most of Panzergranate's posts involve randomly spewing historical info. Not always relevant.
|
#157
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thats not neccisarily a bad thing.
|
#158
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
And that's not the only reason I-153 Chaika pilots had their canopy open. But also because it gave them a better view, and they weren't restricted by the canopy. And it was only a a couple of types of I-153s that had canopies. Most were open cockpit like the I-16s. That was a good discussion. ![]() |
#159
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah i would have called it an argument but it was more freindly.
more of a gentlemans disagreement. |
#160
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Oh and Yak-3 wins every time. ![]() |
![]() |
|
|