Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey

IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151  
Old 11-02-2009, 02:33 AM
olife olife is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: france
Posts: 972
Default

f6f hellcat is a cool name
Reply With Quote
  #152  
Old 11-02-2009, 02:54 PM
Vulcan607 Vulcan607 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Angels 6
Posts: 470
Default

Vickers Valient has a ring to it.
Reply With Quote
  #153  
Old 11-02-2009, 02:58 PM
haitch40 haitch40 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 1,128
Default

hmm cool aircraft name

f86 sabre
or F4 phantom
Reply With Quote
  #154  
Old 11-02-2009, 03:06 PM
Panzergranate Panzergranate is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 167
Default

Both the Hurricane and Spitfire had something that the Yak and the LaGG didn't have..... armour plating behind the pilot's seat and a firewall between the cockpit and the fuel tank.

The I-i53 ahd a terrible reputation for the airflow blowing through the undercarriage well turning the cockpit into a blast furnace when the non-self sealing or armoured fuel tanks caught fire. It is because of this that Soviet pilots never felw with the canopy cover ftted, as they needed to escape in a hurry when hit.
Reply With Quote
  #155  
Old 11-02-2009, 03:07 PM
Vulcan607 Vulcan607 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Angels 6
Posts: 470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Panzergranate View Post
Both the Hurricane and Spitfire had something that the Yak and the LaGG didn't have..... armour plating behind the pilot's seat and a firewall between the cockpit and the fuel tank.

The I-i53 ahd a terrible reputation for the airflow blowing through the undercarriage well turning the cockpit into a blast furnace when the non-self sealing or armoured fuel tanks caught fire. It is because of this that Soviet pilots never felw with the canopy cover ftted, as they needed to escape in a hurry when hit.
I take it this continues from mine and soviets discussion.
Reply With Quote
  #156  
Old 11-02-2009, 03:11 PM
Ancient Seraph Ancient Seraph is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dutchman in Spain
Posts: 788
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan607 View Post
I take it this continues from mine and soviets discussion.
Most of Panzergranate's posts involve randomly spewing historical info. Not always relevant.
Reply With Quote
  #157  
Old 11-02-2009, 06:28 PM
Vulcan607 Vulcan607 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Angels 6
Posts: 470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ancient Seraph View Post
Most of Panzergranate's posts involve randomly spewing historical info. Not always relevant.
Thats not neccisarily a bad thing.
Reply With Quote
  #158  
Old 11-02-2009, 08:56 PM
Soviet Ace Soviet Ace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Guarding the skies of the Motherland!!
Posts: 1,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Panzergranate View Post
Both the Hurricane and Spitfire had something that the Yak and the LaGG didn't have..... armour plating behind the pilot's seat and a firewall between the cockpit and the fuel tank.

The I-153 ahd a terrible reputation for the airflow blowing through the undercarriage well turning the cockpit into a blast furnace when the non-self sealing or armoured fuel tanks caught fire. It is because of this that Soviet pilots never felw with the canopy cover ftted, as they needed to escape in a hurry when hit.
Actually, later LaGG-3s did have armor plating, but only experimental versions did, but the pilots didn't like it because it restricted their view. Second, the Yaks didn't need armor plating behind the pilot because they had bullet proof glass behind them. Which the La's also had, and LaGG-3s of later types.

And that's not the only reason I-153 Chaika pilots had their canopy open. But also because it gave them a better view, and they weren't restricted by the canopy. And it was only a a couple of types of I-153s that had canopies. Most were open cockpit like the I-16s.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan607 View Post
I take it this continues from mine and soviets discussion.
That was a good discussion.
Reply With Quote
  #159  
Old 11-03-2009, 04:56 PM
Vulcan607 Vulcan607 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Angels 6
Posts: 470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soviet Ace View Post



That was a good discussion.
Yeah i would have called it an argument but it was more freindly.
more of a gentlemans disagreement.
Reply With Quote
  #160  
Old 11-03-2009, 07:44 PM
Soviet Ace Soviet Ace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Guarding the skies of the Motherland!!
Posts: 1,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan607 View Post
Yeah i would have called it an argument but it was more freindly.
more of a gentlemans disagreement.
Well I don't know about you. But I wasn't arguing. More like you said a gentleman's disagreement. But it was like me an FOZ, no real anger or anything. Just friendly rivalry.

Oh and Yak-3 wins every time.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.