Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #131  
Old 10-02-2011, 11:56 PM
TomcatViP TomcatViP is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,323
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheesehawk View Post
Accelerometers we used in cars was to test suspension tweaks during cornering, they're computer electrical devices bolted to the floorpan (normally under the driver) that read acceleration in the horizontal plane (360 degrees). Pretty complex, broke one once, and cost us $10k to replace?

I know its not the same thing that a 1930 engineer would have used, but figured it works on the same principle, even if the scales/terminology would have been different due to use/time/language.
My guess is that they were some kind of piezoelectric (high frequency of the suspension system)). Take a look at Wiki to see how it works.

10k$ is a lot of money for a single one !
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 10-03-2011, 02:52 AM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
Combine it with typical onset rates and the tactical disadvantage becomes clearer.
It is actually fortunate that GOR is so rare in flight. Human threshold for GLOC is much lower for GOR than ROR.
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 10-03-2011, 05:43 AM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

"Do you guys have copy of the actual Spitfire Mk I POH? "

Yes
Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old 10-03-2011, 07:04 AM
ZaltysZ's Avatar
ZaltysZ ZaltysZ is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lithuania
Posts: 426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheesehawk View Post
Accelerometers we used in cars was to test suspension tweaks during cornering, they're computer electrical devices bolted to the floorpan (normally under the driver) that read acceleration in the horizontal plane (360 degrees). Pretty complex, broke one once, and cost us $10k to replace?

I know its not the same thing that a 1930 engineer would have used, but figured it works on the same principle, even if the scales/terminology would have been different due to use/time/language.
Depending on required precision and response time, accelerometer implementations can vary. In some case you can get away even with simple weight+spring.
Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old 10-03-2011, 11:35 AM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IvanK View Post
"Do you guys have copy of the actual Spitfire Mk I POH? "

Yes
Ok, good.
Reply With Quote
  #136  
Old 10-03-2011, 05:29 PM
Viper2000 Viper2000 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 218
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
Yes the onset rate is extremely important. Very rarely do you experience gradual onset rates in an airplane depending on the definition. That is why I asked IvanK about the onset rate information in the report.
Onset rate doesn't make much if any practical difference to the carburettor's behaviour because the determining factors are the geometry of the float chamber, the position of the float and the fuel flow rates into and out of the chamber, none of which are going to be a strong function of dg/dt.

As soon as the g level falls below about +0.1 indicated, the float stops floating properly, and the carburettor therefore stops metering. Exactly what reduced positive g will cause misbehaviour will depend upon the friction in the system and any slosh in the float chamber, leading to slight variation on a case by case basis; but this sort of detail is way beyond the scope of a simulation of this nature.

Much earlier in this thread I calculated the approximate subsequent chain of events for both the reduced positive and negative g cases.

In both cases, I would expect a lag between departure from 1 g flight and cut behaviour due to the volume of the float chamber, engine demand, and fuel pump delivery rate.

(For this reason, normal turbulence would seem quite unlikely to produce cut behaviour.)
Reply With Quote
  #137  
Old 10-03-2011, 10:44 PM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
Onset rate doesn't make much if any practical difference
Only if you want to the answer to the question "WHEN does cut out occur?"

Quote:
(For this reason, normal turbulence would seem quite unlikely to produce cut behaviour.)
Yes, it certainly will produce a cut out if the acceleration reaches the threshold.

Quote:
As soon as the g level falls below about +0.1 indicated, the float stops floating properly, and the carburettor therefore stops metering. Exactly what reduced positive g will cause misbehaviour will depend upon the friction in the system and any slosh in the float chamber, leading to slight variation on a case by case basis; but this sort of detail is way beyond the scope of a simulation of this nature.
Once again, in an engine consuming 100 gallons per hour, the tiny bit in the float bowl will not last a cycle....

Even in a lycoming consuming 9 gallons per hour, a cut out and rpm change can be heard in turbulence or any negative acceleration.

Where do think kids get the airplane engine noises, "WAAAA waaaaaaaa WWWAAAAAAA" when playing from??
Reply With Quote
  #138  
Old 10-04-2011, 12:52 PM
TomcatViP TomcatViP is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,323
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheesehawk View Post
LOL!! So do German kids make "vrrrrrrrp brattt bratttbratttttt" when they play planes?
"Meeeep Mep MeeepMeeep " here in the country of thundering Renault engines (excluding F1 obviously)

Regarding the cut out and turbulences : more consumption -> more flow -> higher capacity fuel pumps -> more fuel momentum -> less probability of a cutout from turbulences only

It seems as if some of us wld hve to compute the exact flow rates of the eng pump to end this debate

But definitively Crumpp is right for the Lynco.
Reply With Quote
  #139  
Old 10-04-2011, 11:07 PM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomcatViP View Post
"Meeeep Mep MeeepMeeep " here in the country of thundering Renault engines (excluding F1 obviously)

Regarding the cut out and turbulences : more consumption -> more flow -> higher capacity fuel pumps -> more fuel momentum -> less probability of a cutout from turbulences only

It seems as if some of us wld hve to compute the exact flow rates of the eng pump to end this debate

But definitively Crumpp is right for the Lynco.
Ok some Maths for the Boffins. Knock yourselves out guys Here are the Maths used in the design of the first attempt at the Negative G solution. The Source is the First document I referred to in previous posts. Note Its Merlin XX data.








Last edited by IvanK; 10-04-2011 at 11:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #140  
Old 10-07-2011, 12:41 PM
TomcatViP TomcatViP is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,323
Default

Thx IvanK for providing such a valuable source.

I understand there that CoD devs has alrdy really worked the point.

Considering that if the 0.2g was the design limit to sustain for the CutOut on the converted engine, the CutOut began much earlier on standard Merlin's (although obviously bellow 1G).

Doing a quick calculation (to be refined) I have a 0.017G as the min value for the cutout to begin in a non-modified eng with an assumed similar geometry (you need then to add the time that the 2nd carb chamber emptied it self of its remaining fuel - Vip as done that before - negligeable).

So am fully converting myself to Crumpp idea now. As a culprit of false assumption I condemn myself to run around my neighborhood both arms raised like wings and making loudly sputtering "WAAAA waaaaaaaa WWWAAAAAAA" engine noise.

Last edited by TomcatViP; 10-07-2011 at 02:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.