![]() |
#121
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#122
|
|||
|
|||
![]() So true . . . I feel the discussion of the ammo is relevant, even though the devs won't patch to fix it in ClOD, possibly maybe after the sequel, but its good to get it out now, so in the sequel, the ammo can be more historically correct . . . and issues like this is on their minds. I just had to say this, even though its already been said. Quote:
This is wrong. With this attitude you won't help anyone, just throw false accusations. You call someone out and tarnish their rep with out evidence. I know its possible to cheat. Shoot when Call of Duty 3 was released or Black Ops, within the hour, people were cheating (more so on PS3). on WOW (blizzard mmorpg) when they released cataclysm (new add on), on the day of, between the lags, there was cheating going on . . . and Blizzard puts alot of effort into stopping the cheaters. But if you feel strongly someone is cheating compile evidence, have video, get other witnesses, etc. That way you help yourself and everyone else on the server, and help people to know about the cheat, help in development in the game (and the devs can fix it / the guys hosting the server can do something about it). Even if you can't do anything about it, putting the evidence out there will put it on the devs or the ones running the server to do something about it, or at least warn others so they know. You don't take a holier than thou attitude in this. If you're going to call someone out, back up with facts and proof. If you can't, its just hearsay. Otherwise be quiet about it, and if they are known for cheating eventually they'll get caught and your suspicions are correct. And if they aren't, then they've earned their reputations and will continue to pwn people. ok back to the ammo discussion. . . Last edited by JG52Uther; 10-24-2012 at 02:18 PM. |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not really. The cannons on the 109 kick like hell and go all over the place... firing above 100 metres with cannon is a waste of ammo. Thats why guys with high scores use the E1 plus the extra ammo...
|
#124
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fellas neither side can prove how abundant these rounds were and I'm guessing the devs couldn't either so they are modeled...get over it
You've count de whilde in abundance which causes a lot of DMG to a 109, you talk about the big hitters using the e1....not true Numbers of E1 have risen due to you harping on in this thread ALSO Beos do not work online in any 109 so regardless what model you take were going to load SMKh Just stop on your quest now EDIT Seriously we've gone from the whiners and the fanbois at war for how long? Now we've got the finished no more updates on CoD certain members have finished from here crawled back under there rocks but now we've got another breed of purists counting the rivots.. If people want to load 100% of a certain ammo let them do it, you play your historical load out game but don't try and force it on others...go play a server that sanctions it... In every game off every genre on every forum your get the ones shouting the loudest who are on the receiving end just like the blues moaning about the spits Alt advantage in game now yada yada.. Sort it out before you get the ammo changed too Last edited by Ze-Jamz; 10-24-2012 at 09:55 AM. |
#125
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"It allows players to load up 2000 rounds and 60 seconds worth of firing into the E-1,..."
Well sort of. The MG 17 has a cyclic rate of about 1200 rounds per minute. The two cowling guns have up to 1000 rpg. This should give you about 50 seconds of continuous fire, at least in theory. The 17s in the wings had up to 500 rpg. This would give you about 20 seconds of fire. So, in reality, just like the E 3/4, the E 1 has just two weapons that should provide more than about 20 seconds of continuous fire. "The game has created a weapons system for the 109's which isn't based on any kind of historical reality. The Germans were converting their MG armed E-1's as fast as they could into cannon armed versions because the cannon versions were more effective. The real life pilots complained when they had to fly the E-1's. The opposite is happening in CoD. Go on the servers, the guys who have the biggest scores are flying the E-1, and Blue flyers are converting wholesale into this plane from the E-3 and E-4." The ammo issue is clearly an anomaly, but it's hardly the only one. Others include the ability of Spits to shrug off catastrophic cannon damage and continue fighting, or to lose an elevator with no apparent reduction in turning performance. Unless you're suggesting that individuals are actually using the tungsten ammo anomaly, in conjunction with some sort of aim bot, I really struggle to see why its such a big deal. If you allow someone to assume a good shooting position on your six then chances are, tungsten or no tungsten, you're unlikely to make it home. |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#127
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Totally agree, the spits have a ludicrous DM.
If you fly at 3000m above an airfield in a 109 for any length of time and your going to be going down. Now do the same in a spit, it just soaks up damage like its made of 20mm thick titanium!!!!! This is the simple truth, I have flown both red and blue.
__________________
![]() Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL. CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10. INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4. |
#128
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All kills are PK in this Hurri vid as you could see before. This is not a privilege of tungsten only but of any AP ammo and aiming at the center of aircraft instead of wings (sharp at convergence range). A pilot is the softest part of an airplane.
http://youtu.be/ZczgdRRdGV8 I think it is possible to limit certain loadouts on server side via scripting if needed. MG just gave us a possibility to use different loadouts. Offline it is a responsibility of a mission-maker to include historic loadouts (this is the reason we can not change it offline). There is probably a way to do this online too, C# scripters know better. |
#129
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Using the default 109 loadout I have good success against the Spits. I always try to make my first burst on the inside port wing. With the resulting oil leak his time in the sky is now on the clock
![]()
__________________
GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5 |
#130
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Have you ever tried to outturn an experienced 109 driver, when he notices that you are in trouble? Probably not, because you are dead before long. At the same time, there is definitely something wrong with the Spitfires DM. How many times was i set on fire? Never! S! |
![]() |
|
|