Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #111  
Old 09-06-2011, 04:11 PM
esmiol esmiol is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 208
Default

how do you put brake on directly?

i try to config the command brake crew...and don't seem to work
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 09-06-2011, 04:12 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG53Frankyboy View Post
this spwan with brakes is a workaround like deleting trees to avoid loosing sound in MP. The influence of the wind is too strong, sure it shoud have some.
But how ever you call it, WIP or whatever - in general term its a mistake/error/failure/bug to be edited.......
+1
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 09-06-2011, 04:16 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
So you agree it's a bug and you have found a work around, but it's still a bug or would you say the no sound problem and trees off work around is not a bug either...
Bingo!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 09-06-2011, 04:18 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jg52krupi View Post
dude they are reworking the ground physics and the likes because they are currently bugged next your gonna tell me flying ships are a common sight in real life.
rotfl
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 09-06-2011, 04:31 PM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by esmiol View Post
how do you put brake on directly?

i try to config the command brake crew...and don't seem to work
I use an axis and let it in full before begin spawn in a mission.

ACE, get yourself a lady or man. Maybe five posts to "try" be "cool"?

You need a life ASAP.
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 09-06-2011, 04:34 PM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
IMHO it is a bug that a WWII configured Spitfire will sit and spin in winds of 10mps (22mph) based on the FACT that the Australian Bureau of Meteorology does NOT send out warnigs to civil airports for wind speeds less than 18mps (39mph). Which means there is no fear of a plane moving due to winds less than 18mps (39mph).
Spawn with brakes on... We already move on... "Australian Bureau of Meteorology"...
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 09-06-2011, 04:56 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM View Post
I use an axis and let it in full before begin spawn in a mission.

ACE, get yourself a lady or man. Maybe five posts to "try" be "cool"?

You need a life ASAP.
Oh oh..

I have seen this before.. When Lo realise he is wrong he resorts to personal attacks to take the focus off the fact that he is wrong

Oh well.. This thread was interesting for awhile, too bad these types are allowed to carry on like this
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 09-06-2011, 05:00 PM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Oh well.. This thread was interesting for awhile, too bad these types are allowed to carry on like this
Testing things and making videos showing stuff of Cliffs of Dover sim?

Yes, people of my kind need to be banned of forums. We need more users like you, with relevant contributions...
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 09-06-2011, 05:08 PM
Ze-Jamz Ze-Jamz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: On your six!!
Posts: 2,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM View Post
Testing things and making videos showing stuff of Cliffs of Dover sim?

Yes, people of my kind need to be banned of forums. We need more users like you, with relevant contributions...
Lob...Ok listen

Do you know what a personal attack is?

Because you do it EVERYTIME... do you understand this?

It doesnt do anything for you my friend and people get pi$$ed off real quick and will have no further dealing with you or take anything you say serioulsy..

SO

some friendly advice, yes we like having folks like you around testing and helping out the community..what we DONT want is you always reverting to personal attacks to aid your discussion..

You seem to speak good english so im guessing you understand where im coming from.

like i say, just some friendly advice

Last edited by Ze-Jamz; 09-06-2011 at 05:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 09-06-2011, 05:37 PM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default


Lobisomem: You make some very good, valid and useful points, but you're putting them forward in an aggressive manner. Stop the personal attacks, just tell people what you tested and what you found out, it's very simple.

Ace: I don't know who started it and frankly by this point i don't care because we're way beyond the point of a justified initial response to a provocative poster. We are now at the point where you make 5 posts in a row to wind him up, you don't even make a single one but clutter up the entire thread.

I don't want to lock this when testing is being done and useful findings are surfacing, so if any moderating is to be done it will be centered on you two and not the thread itself and we all know what this means.

Please, calm your tempers and mind your manners and attitudes somewhat.

I think this is a fair and ample warning to play nice. If you guys don't stop biting on each other's throat i'll have no other choice but to enforce the rules: if i don't do it in this case then i will have no credibility to demand other people to respect the same rules.

Please don't make me start banning grown-up people in a useful thread just because they can't accept different opinions
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.