![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think the present plane set with the exclusion of the Spit II and the E-4 has pushed the dogfights down to the deck again. This can become a bit of a quandary for the Rotol and Spit 1/1a if 109’s get above you and they manage their E correctly it is hard to turn the tables and go on the offense (this is where comms are an absolute must). With the Spit II’s in there you have to respect its low alt performance when flying the 109 and so the dogfights were much higher. I enjoy both plane sets and hope they start rotating them.
JD AKA_MattE
__________________
ASUS Crosshair IV Formula AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE @ 3.4ghz ZALMAN 120mm CPU Cooler Intel X25-M 160GB SSD Mushkin Enhanced Redline 8GB MSI R7970 OC ATI Catalyst 12.3 KINGWIN Mach 1 1000W COOLER MASTER HAF 932 MajorBoris "Question: Do you forum more than you fly?" raaaid "i love it here makes me look normal" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't see the Spit2/E4 making a return on this server untill the next update is released. Too many bad vibes!
As for the ME110, didn't the LW devise a defensive circle tactic for them as they were being picked off by both the Hurri and the Spit too easily? Personally, I have learn't a lot from flying the Spit1a despite the frustration when you know that the encounter is going to be purely defensive! I avoid the low altitude furballs- the FPS is dreadfull , it's tactically incorrect for a Mk1a - you can't shoot properly in a slide show, or bail without frigging dying and it usually ends up in a rapid Launcher crash! Roll on the update........meanwhile I will hapilly stay with the Spit1a - preferably at 16K+ (except whem Mk.MrX is about then its 21K..........)
__________________
MP ATAG_EvangelusE AMD A8 5600K Quad Core 3.6 Ghz - Win 7 64 - 8Gb Ram - GTX660ti 2Gb VRAM - FreeTrack - X52 - Asus 23' Monitor. Last edited by SEE; 01-16-2012 at 09:57 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
So some of the LW have bullied the Spit IIa off the server. Well done lads, nice work.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, I'm undecided about the absence of the Spit IIa. The 1a is certainly useless on the deck against a good 109 - they will just climb away and start booming you. The tight turn of the spit allows you to evade but apart from a lucky snap it is impossible to go offensive if they don't start turning with you.
As for the spit 1, I just don't see the point of it... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lol but he's dangerous at any altitude. ATAG should have another column: "# times shot down by MrX", I would probably be leading!
He often uses an accomplice rabbit to line you up - very effective tactic. Last edited by jimbop; 01-16-2012 at 10:06 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I say 21k because we engaged at high altitude twice and the fights were good - I imagine its more difficult to go vertical (to the extent where the BF can climb vertically, seemingly for ever and ever) at that altitude. The other encounter was at around 18k but he can still (and does use) the vertical climb superiority of the BF to get a solution - in my case a forced bailout as he swiped my controls in a single short burst.
Last night I emptied all my rounds into his E1 and he still killed me! - I was gutted as I stared into my Black screen - a few seconds later his E1 hit the deck and it was 1 pilot kill each - I felt much better! Had a brief exchange of chat afterwards and he is a very nice guy as well as an outstanding pilot! I learn more from him and the good BF pilots so don't mind getting swiped - it's how you learn.
__________________
MP ATAG_EvangelusE AMD A8 5600K Quad Core 3.6 Ghz - Win 7 64 - 8Gb Ram - GTX660ti 2Gb VRAM - FreeTrack - X52 - Asus 23' Monitor. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not being provocative about the 110. I fly red and blue so I don't have an agenda. I am aware of the affect mass has on allowing an object to hold it's speed. This is also why you can gain altitude faster by diving and zoom climbing than just by conventional climbing However if the 110 was this effective in real life it would not have needed a 109 escort which it famously required during bob. Sent from my phone so forgive any mistaskes pls.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Aaaaaaarrrrrgghhh You've just kill me hundreds of time. Tht's why I hate so much the stupid FM IL2 had on some plane (not talking abt old CFS). Painful to see that way how disastrous a complaisant FM can have on the sim community (and RL pilot ?). Pls don't take me wrong there is nothing personal. You hve all the right to be wrong (as I do take mine from time to time ![]() No, the height you loss in a dive is not to be exceeded after with a zoom climb. You can't climb by alternating dive and zoom. Tht's Il2 world only. If you want to fast climb, first use your kin E by putting your nose over the horizon using your cte climb incidence as a reference. Your plane will coast rise using the energy due to the speed and then climb at the best ratio possible once your vector speed has fall down to best climb speed. Zooming (like going full vertical) does not accelerate your time to alt. It simply reduce the time for distance separation with an opponent that hve less E. But you hve to know that the maximum alt you will gain with a given state of E is in fact much less than using the above technique. ~S |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
PS. And btw acceleration of a falling object does not depend on its weight, rather on weight to drag ratio IIRC. In vacuum 2 objects of different weight would fall with the same speed. Last edited by Ataros; 01-17-2012 at 01:33 PM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by xnomad; 01-20-2012 at 08:47 PM. |
![]() |
|
|