Inaccurate performance data for BOB fighters in COD comparing to RL data

[Glider]

Originally Posted by Kurfürst

Actually we only have a handful of raffanatics doing the good old character assassination campaign, because they can't come up with anything better, mental or material, as they lack in both.

Well if you could come up with some supporting evidence for the theory that the the RAF used 87 octane in the BOB it would be welcome.

[Glider]

Originally Posted by Kurfürst

Obviously no, it's what you are suggesting.

What I am suggesting is that the fact that some Squadrons were using it over France is irrelevant until we know how and if they were supplied with 100 octane fuel once their remnants returned to England.

I like the 'if' part of the reply. Kurfursts view is that the RAF did use 100 octane in France to defend France, but the RAF may not have used it to defend the UK.

A novel thought I admit.

[GraveyardJimmy]

Originally Posted by Glider

I like the 'if' part of the reply. Kurfursts view is that the RAF did use 100 octane in France to defend France, but the RAF may not have used it to defend the UK.

A novel thought I admit.

If that was the case surely there would be reports of performance during battle of France and how it compared once supply was restricted during battle of Britain? I haven't seen any comments on this marked change in aircraft performance and how the RAF was suddenly on a back foot.

[KG26_Alpha]

Ok

I locked this thread last week for the same reason its gone full circle once again with insults.

You can draw you own conclusions to suit your own opinions from the data provided in this thread already,
further discussion is pointless.

It will remain closed permanently.




.