Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-02-2012, 02:58 PM
zapatista's Avatar
zapatista zapatista is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
furbs.. I have a few questions for you.. Could you take 5 mins to answer them? Thanks in advance

1) Looking at your list of questions, do you belive there are any that Luthier is NOT aware of?
2) Do you believe Luither lying when he says "We’re working on it non-stop" wrt the patch?
3) Do you belive all your questions could be answered in 5 min or less to the level of detail that would satisfy you and others? (ie beyond a simple Y or N)

If you answered no to all three questions..

Than wouldn't you agree that Luither's time would be better spent working on the patch than giving us highly detailed dally updates that due to the very nature of programing could be undone or changed the next day due to an previously unforeseen programing issue?

If you answered yes to any of the three questions disregard the need to reply back

S!
why do you believe every post in this forum needs your opinion ?

at this point you'r contributing nothing here and are just adding antagonism

if you cant contribute constructively, dont bother posting. threads are not like lamp posts for dogs where they have a bit of a wiff and leave their piddle. their intended to be meaningful exchanges, and we were doing fine here before you added your nonsense.
__________________
President Dwight D. Eisenhower 1953: Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone, it is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children
  #2  
Old 03-02-2012, 03:00 PM
Tvrdi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zapatista View Post
why do you believe every post in this forum needs your opinion ?
Hes on meds. Just ignore him because thers no sense...
  #3  
Old 03-02-2012, 03:16 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tvrdi View Post
Hes on meds. Just ignore him because thers no sense...
Tvrdi.. now you know better than that.. Just uncalled for.. So instead of me reporting your post to the mods.. Why do we work this out here? How about you del that post and than Ill del this one and lets keep this thread clean.. Deal?
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #4  
Old 03-02-2012, 03:20 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zapatista View Post
why do you believe every post in this forum needs your opinion ?
zap.. do you understand what forums are for?

As in a place for people to discuss the game and exchange ideas.

You do reliase that right?
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #5  
Old 03-02-2012, 03:38 PM
zapatista's Avatar
zapatista zapatista is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
zap.. do you understand what forums are for?

As in a place for people to discuss the game and exchange ideas.

You do reliase that right?
but that is not what you are doing here

reread this thread from the start, untill you added you'r personal antagonism the exchange of information here was productive

this isnt about YOUR rights, this is about the rights of forum visitors to have normal exchanges of information without your constant interference.

if a picture is easier for you to understand, your rights to wave your arms about stop where the next persons nose starts, and you dont seem to comprehend that

when you go into a pub or bar, do you go up to every group of people having a conversation and "contribute" ?. telling one person you dont like the beer he is drinking, the next that he should dress different, and another group that they should talk about something else or have a different opinion ? get it ? other people here have conversations that dont always need to involve you,

your clue to determine if your input is appropriate or not is whether you can contribute in a productive sense in the discussion and let the "original poster's topic" conversation run its course, if you cant do that your in the wrong place (like you are in this instance).
__________________
President Dwight D. Eisenhower 1953: Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone, it is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children
  #6  
Old 03-02-2012, 03:43 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zapatista View Post
but that is not what you are doing here
Well that is your opinion and your welcome to it.. but know that I disagree

Now if you really belive that is what I am doing..

Than instead of you playing MOD

Simply report the post and let the mods decide!

Who knows maybe they will agree with you and del the post?

But this tit for tat game you want to play with me only makes things worse imho

So this will be my last reply to you on this.

Thanks in advance for understanding
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #7  
Old 03-02-2012, 03:56 PM
Force10 Force10 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
furbs.. I have a few questions for you.. Could you take 5 mins to answer them? Thanks in advance

1) Looking at your list of questions, do you belive there are any that Luthier is NOT aware of?
2) Do you believe Luither lying when he says "We’re working on it non-stop" wrt the patch?
3) Do you belive all your questions could be answered in 5 min or less to the level of detail that would satisfy you and others? (ie beyond a simple Y or N)

If you answered no to all three questions..

Than wouldn't you agree that Luither's time would be better spent working on the patch than giving us highly detailed dally updates that due to the very nature of programing could be undone or changed the next day due to an previously unforeseen programing issue?

If you answered yes to any of the three questions disregard the need to reply back

S!
If you read his post you would see he is asking if these "known" issues are going to be addressed in this patch, or if we will have to wait longer. Maybe you can just put your personal issues aside, because it is something most of us want to know, pessimists and optimists alike.
  #8  
Old 03-02-2012, 04:14 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Force10 View Post
If you read his post you would see he is asking if these "known" issues are going to be addressed in this patch, or if we will have to wait longer.
Read it.. And I have read it each and everytime furbs or anyone else asks it..

Just wanted to get a feel as for what people like furbs expect..

In that I fear the exptations are allreayd set so high that no amount of fixes or additions will make everyone happy..

But I digresss..

It appear that BS has allready stated what I was trying to say, i.e.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSix View Post
All we can tell about the patch is in today's update.
We do not announce anything yet about the details. To talk and not do - it's the worst thing in our situation. Expect the Readme, please, everything will be written.
In a nut shell..

Why have Luither write up the pending 'readme' prior to the work being done?

Nuff said on this imho

Your milage may vary
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.

Last edited by ACE-OF-ACES; 03-02-2012 at 04:16 PM.
  #9  
Old 03-02-2012, 04:24 PM
Damixu Damixu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Finland
Posts: 128
Default

What I see here in the forum in general is different people asking the same (valid or not) questions again and again, even some of them are already answered.

May I propose that you Black Six collect and condense these same (20ish or so) key questions to one solid highly visible sticky thread and cleary communicate with mods that no already stated question are allowed to be posted.

At least I suffer a lot glansing these forums reading same (and often whiney) questions again and again. The more relevant content are clouded by this unneccesary repetition.

Just my two cents...

Last edited by Damixu; 03-02-2012 at 04:49 PM.
  #10  
Old 03-02-2012, 04:28 PM
Force10 Force10 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post

In that I fear the exptations are allreayd set so high that no amount of fixes or additions will make everyone happy..

Well, the response was bad news for offline flyers like myself since the game runs pretty smooth already, so it was good to know. The patch won't do much for the offline experience, so on the shelf it will stay....again. It's funny how far we have to lower the bar when "expectations are set so high" to be able to have a enjoyable offline experience a year after purchase.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.