Friday Update - December 9, 2011

[Krt_Bong]

I still find it amusing to see people get indignant about how their game is unplayable, when their Sig describes a rig better than mine and make assumptions on what the developers are doing based on a few short sentences. I have no doubt that they are doing the best they can, and saying very little on purpose. The Peanut Gallery is a vicious mob.
my game is very playable...

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Originally Posted by Krt_Bong

my game is very playable...

As is mine and many Many MANY more

I think the reason it seems like there are so many having problems here is simple human nature

People who have problems go looking for answers.. Which in turn brings them here

People who are having no problems are off enjoying the game.. Which in turn may or may not bring them here

Thus the amout of people with problems gets skeued/filtered to make it seem worse than it really is

[Dano]

Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles

What guarantee is there that we won't see the same? Ohh sorry guys, dynamic weather will be pushed back to the 3rd sequel?

None, why don't you wait and buy it after ascertaining what it contains?

[addman]

Originally Posted by Dano

None, why don't you wait and buy it after ascertaining what it contains?

I will this time around, last time I had faith in MG from all their years of great work on IL-2. I wouldn't worry too much though, I'm sure it will be a Forgotten Battles type of deal, I mean, seriously they wouldn't try to sell us a brand new stand-alone game while dropping support for CLoD. The outrage would make the original CloD release pale in comparison.

[Dano]

Lol, true story!

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Originally Posted by addman

I will this time around, last time I had faith in MG from all their years of great work on IL-2. I wouldn't worry too much though, I'm sure it will be a Forgotten Battles type of deal, I mean, seriously they wouldn't try to sell us a brand new stand-alone game while dropping support for CLoD. The outrage would make the original CloD release pale in comparison.

Based on the 1C track record..

CoD planes, maps, etc will be included in the next release.

That is the formula that 1C used with IL-2 and it worked well, so I don't see why they would just toss all those planes and maps

[addman]

Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES

Based on the 1C track record..

CoD planes, maps, etc will be included in the next release.

That is the formula that 1C used with IL-2 and it worked well, so I don't see why they would just toss all those planes and maps

If that's the case then I'm a happy camper.

[SIDWULF]

Ilya seems like a good guy with a great personality. The negativity is incredible here. IL2 Cliffs of Dover is visually and technically excellent. And the problems you speak of are far from deal breakers. I think people spend to much time posting here and not enough acctually playing the game to have an idea about what they are talking about.

[philip.ed]

Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES

Based on the 1C track record..

CoD planes, maps, etc will be included in the next release.

That is the formula that 1C used with IL-2 and it worked well, so I don't see why they would just toss all those planes and maps

Aye, but will support for the BoB aspect continue? As it stands, it's arguably the most inferior off-line representation of Battle of Britain on the market (in terms of air-combat-simulation). There is nothing that immerses you in the battle. It's not a simulation; it's a technical representation. I seriously hope this game manifests (offline) into something at least as immersive as BoB2.

[Richie]

Everyone is clear what sequels are right. Not new games but addons to the existing game to make it fuller. Like Forgotten Battles got. About five times it's original size.