Do we need new trees?

[SYN_Repent]

Originally Posted by pupo162

I would like to say im from portugal and likewise you i have an opinion who happens to be different from yours, visuals improve the FLIGHT sim otherwise we would have stayed with 1946 with a CEM remoddeling.

i would fix a smiley for you, but i dont want to be rude.

have a nice day.

this +1

tress that cant be collided with.....now that is progress

[jg27_mc]

Originally Posted by pupo162

I would like to say im from portugal and likewise you i have an opinion who happens to be different from yours, visuals improve the FLIGHT sim otherwise we would have stayed with 1946 with a CEM remoddeling.

i would fix a smiley for you, but i dont want to be rude.

have a nice day.

errr... Your opinion doesn't count. Everyone knows Portugal is DOOMED!

j/k

A few thoughts:

RoF trees are not perfect, but they offer a good compromise between visual aspect, good FPS and DM.

I am grounded (for the last 3 months + -, I was bored to death with the performance/bug issues) but last time I tried it, trees were an FPS hog for the overall quality they offered...

~S~

[Qpassa]

less trees and collison model

[major_setback]

Less complex trees and a lot more of them. They look terrible from a distance.

They don't 'glitter'.

[6BL Bird-Dog]

Originally Posted by pupo162

yes.

these are a performance whore, little overdone, and give a very poor impression of florest areas, tough they look fine by themselfs.

we also need bushes, headgrows and all that stuiff missing from england.

oh! and colissions!

+1

[NedLynch]

If it serves performance then yes, however that voting option is not persent.

The more important perfromance killer are still clouds, but it is my understanding that these as well as other things are not final so I am hoping for a serious performance increase once the graphics engine is at a somewhat finalized state.

[mazex]

Originally Posted by Bloblast

Do we need new trees?

These are them from Rise of flight including damage model:

I really like RoF too, but when people say the graphics are better in RoF than CoD they need to look at screen shots like this. Look at those distant forests that look like some kid has used the brush tool in Photoshop And seriously, those giant sterile fields with no tree lines, roads or hedges may have existed in Soviet Russia but not in 1918 France...

[pupo162]

Originally Posted by mazex

I really like RoF too, but when people say the graphics are better in RoF than CoD they need to look at screen shots like this. Look at those distant forests that look like some kid has used the brush tool in Photoshop And seriously, those giant sterile fields with no tree lines, roads or hedges may have existed in Soviet Russia but not in 1918 France...

thats how COD looks to me.