Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

View Poll Results: Why do you run CloD on Microsoft XP?
I don't have the funds needed 4 20.00%
I don't want to spend the money 1 5.00%
I don't know how to upgrade 0 0%
I prefer XP over W7/Vista 4 20.00%
My hardware won't run W7 3 15.00%
Other reasons 8 40.00%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-05-2011, 02:50 PM
MadBlaster MadBlaster is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM View Post
Welllllll...

IF you have more of 4GB of RAM, W7 x64 will make CloD runs better, because W7 x64 will use all your RAM to run EVERYTHING - not just CloD - and any game title likes free available physical memory.

IF you have multicore CPU, W7 is MUCH better than XP using all cores.

W7 is better than XP. Simple.
yes, I'm aware of that.

I just checked task manager. The overhead on my xp machine with avg free running in the background is only 400 MB. With the 3gb switch enabled, I can run il-2 max settings online, texture compression off, supplemental programs like freetrack, hyperlobby, glovepie in the background. After that, there is still about 1GB left out of the 3gb total of unused memory. No crashes. I posted Luthier about the 3GB switch and his patch crashes. Hopefully he is listening because it does make a difference if the program you are running is ram intensive. The switch changes the addressing. Moves some from the operating system to the program. Maybe CLoD is pushing the standard xp addressing allocation to the limit? I wouldn't be suprised if it was.

Last edited by MadBlaster; 10-05-2011 at 02:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-05-2011, 09:23 AM
Dano Dano is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Petersfield UK
Posts: 1,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PE_Tigar View Post
Eh, sorry for messing up your poll, I don't actually run XP (except on my office PC - don't ask) but I wanted to see the results .
You know you can click the 'view poll results' button to see the votes without voting yourself right?
__________________
i5 2500k - Asus P8P67Pro - Crucial M4 64GB - 8GB DDR3 - Geforce Ti 560 1GB - Xonar DG - W7 X64 SP1
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-05-2011, 01:19 PM
PE_Tigar PE_Tigar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dano View Post
You know you can click the 'view poll results' button to see the votes without voting yourself right?
I stand ashamed, didn't know
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-05-2011, 01:33 PM
Rowddy Rowddy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 81
Default

lol so funny you guys feel adressed i ment the guy who started the discussion, it's useless and adds nothing constructive to this game. No one is happy with the game as it is but at least they are working hard to make it better. why not sit back and wait what happens for a change?

These discussion are a waste of everyone's time especialy for the peeps working on this game to make it better.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-05-2011, 01:55 PM
ATAG_Snapper's Avatar
ATAG_Snapper ATAG_Snapper is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,286
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rowddy View Post
lol so funny you guys feel adressed i ment the guy who started the discussion, it's useless and adds nothing constructive to this game. No one is happy with the game as it is but at least they are working hard to make it better. why not sit back and wait what happens for a change?

These discussion are a waste of everyone's time especialy for the peeps working on this game to make it better.
Condescension aside, how exactly are these discussions a waste of time for the peeps working on this game to make it better? In another thread, it was suggested that a klaxon sounds off in 1C's development dept. whenever a new posting is added to a 1C Forum discussion thread which obliges all the CoD devs to immediately drop what they're doing, read the new post, then sit down and have a roundtable discussion on how best to ignore said post.....before getting back to work again.

Could this possibly be what you mean by wasting the peeps' time?
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.