![]() |
|
Performance threads All discussions about CoD performnce |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hi,
here are some test I've done looking to understand what influences the IL2 COD performances: These are the commons options for all test: ![]() By desigabri at 2011-11-12 notes: - The HD6950 is a 2GB version tweaked up to a HD6970 - The CPU is aircooled with an A70 Corsair (hardly fitted into the cabinet ![]() ![]() ![]() - DDR3 16GB Vengeance 1600Mhz - no windows paging file - Game loaded onto a 6GB ramdisk to slowdown the game loading times and the missions loading times (and ingame objects during the fly) - Test made playing the "Black Death" Track and using the FPS SHOW START internal option - Radio voice comunication OFF in audio menu settings - Common game settings: ![]() By desigabri at 2011-11-12 overclock 1: ![]() By desigabri at 2011-11-12 this test seems to show that cpu overclock benefits ingame fps overclock 2: ![]() By desigabri at 2011-11-12 this test seems to comfirm the previus one and show how heavy is the shadows option GPU overclock: ![]() By desigabri at 2011-11-12 this one should show that GPU overclock doesn't help (???!) affinity: ![]() By desigabri at 2011-11-12 assigning processes to one, two, theree, four and six cores... - See that starting from 2 cores and up, launcher.exe doesn't change performances. - The best system seems to be a dual core processor that gets best results for FPS min. - A one core CPU isn't able to play as the others other settings: ![]() By desigabri at 2011-11-12 you can't see here performance changes working on minor settings or trying to use priority process assignements power boost: ![]() By desigabri at 2011-11-12 same conclusion for catalyst boost settings very low: ![]() By desigabri at 2011-11-12 very low settings helps a lot for FPS results, anyway you can see that "effects" are very heavy here, also if setted to MEDIUM for FPS min repeatable: ![]() By desigabri at 2011-11-12 the last comparision is made only to see that comparing test made in different times but having the same options, get same results. Before this test I believed it is more important the GPU overclok then the CPU overclock (for ArmA2 I got that conclusion). For IL2 CoD seems the opposite. Last edited by desigabri; 11-12-2011 at 11:44 PM. Reason: couldn't see all pictures |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
code still needs a lot of attension for performance
sure they are hard at work for a big frame rate performance boost. |
![]() |
|
|