Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Performance threads

Performance threads All discussions about CoD performnce

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-12-2011, 09:47 PM
desigabri desigabri is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 14
Default Some TEST

hi,
here are some test I've done looking to understand what influences the IL2 COD performances:

These are the commons options for all test:

By desigabri at 2011-11-12
notes:
- The HD6950 is a 2GB version tweaked up to a HD6970
- The CPU is aircooled with an A70 Corsair (hardly fitted into the cabinet )
- DDR3 16GB Vengeance 1600Mhz
- no windows paging file
- Game loaded onto a 6GB ramdisk to slowdown the game loading times and the missions loading times (and ingame objects during the fly)
- Test made playing the "Black Death" Track and using the FPS SHOW START internal option
- Radio voice comunication OFF in audio menu settings

- Common game settings:

By desigabri at 2011-11-12

overclock 1:

By desigabri at 2011-11-12
this test seems to show that cpu overclock benefits ingame fps

overclock 2:

By desigabri at 2011-11-12
this test seems to comfirm the previus one and show how heavy is the shadows option

GPU overclock:

By desigabri at 2011-11-12
this one should show that GPU overclock doesn't help (???!)

affinity:

By desigabri at 2011-11-12
assigning processes to one, two, theree, four and six cores...
- See that starting from 2 cores and up, launcher.exe doesn't change performances.
- The best system seems to be a dual core processor that gets best results for FPS min.
- A one core CPU isn't able to play as the others

other settings:

By desigabri at 2011-11-12
you can't see here performance changes working on minor settings or trying to use priority process assignements

power boost:

By desigabri at 2011-11-12
same conclusion for catalyst boost settings

very low:

By desigabri at 2011-11-12
very low settings helps a lot for FPS results, anyway you can see that "effects" are very heavy here, also if setted to MEDIUM for FPS min

repeatable:

By desigabri at 2011-11-12
the last comparision is made only to see that comparing test made in different times but having the same options, get same results.

Before this test I believed it is more important the GPU overclok then the CPU overclock (for ArmA2 I got that conclusion). For IL2 CoD seems the opposite.

Last edited by desigabri; 11-12-2011 at 11:44 PM. Reason: couldn't see all pictures
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-13-2011, 03:01 PM
diveplane diveplane is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 143
Default

code still needs a lot of attension for performance

sure they are hard at work for a big frame rate performance boost.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.