![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
double post, sorry
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have to agree that the game elements are distinctly lacking in the sim as it is now. I am jumping online as much as i can to make up for it.
However I find it extraordinary that when i jump back into Il2 it seems so shallow compared to CoD. There is so much potential with this new sim i can't imagine what i could achieve. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
I'd rather be flying ... Gigabyte 990FXA-UD5 | AMD FX-8350 | MSI HD7970 TFOC-BE | 8GB Corsair DDR-III 1866 | Win8.1 Pro 64-bit
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If there's a competition, RoF is winning it atm.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well as Luthier as already stated the game was released only half finished in performance and content, i guess over the next year or so they may be able to get it operating well enough for simmers to start making a few missions and or campaigns. I can run the game well with my rig, but in truth its an effort to want to play it there are way too many annoyances and multiplay is still broken. Its kind of killed my enthusiasm for all things flight sim at the moment, but im sure that will return.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
tbh I would rather donate 45 bucks I spent for CLOD - to ROF team, than to fill the whiny failures pockets (1C)...that simple...I dont even play CLOD because its not performing good on my (powerfull enough) rig, with all the optimisations and tweaks, and I dont like the ugly bright vivid cartoonish landscape, dont like the lack of proper AA....etc etc....etc..funny thing is that I cant even sell the damn failure since its connected with crap like Steam.....
I hope I will get over it soon as 45 bucks for central european guy is alot of money spent on crap..otherwise I would not bother and consider this as thank you for il2 orig and goodbye I guess we would have more "whiners" (more angry customers in fact) that everybody knows the truth...which is - they knew right before the release that the game wasnt finished and optimised well....so they lied in our faces...hey spit in my face...what they can expect from me in return more than my money? probably to be a hypnotised die hard fun like some on this board.... Last edited by Tvrdi; 05-16-2011 at 02:41 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Sims cost money, nothing new here. You gotta be prepared for spending money. If you can`t afford to spend 45$ in a manner you wouldn`t care for it too much, then I don`t think you are financially fit to the genre. Same here. Central Europe. Over 40€ spent on the CE. Am I complaining? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe they're relying on a well established community.
![]() See link here; http://airwarfare.com/sow/index.php |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
for offliners the best missions/campaigns came from 3.party people in classic IL2.
the same will be for CoD (even its scenario is much more limited.......). BUT, with the lack of ducumentation and the more complex possibilites (espacially this scripting part) - it will take some time till the people get familiar with the CoD FMB. one should not expect something from the official development team in that case ! and for onlines its the same actually, missions and maps have to be build...Onlineevents have to organzed. It will take its time. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Unfortunatly the OP has a good point. The QMB that I ALWAYS played in 1946 just isnt there, and what is here is not working to make a complete flight playable.
In a Year this game will rock! Right now, I think I will go back to 1946 for my combat flight fix. If I remember, the same thing happened with 1946. |
![]() |
|
|