![]() |
|
Pilot's Lounge Members meetup |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
i have no clue but according phisics there it is
__________________
3gb ram ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2 I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What does Physics say it is?
|
#73
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One day raaid I'm expecting you to say something so profound the universe ends.. Until then.. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Raaid, have you considered submitting your ideas to the BBC, they would make awesome scripts for the Dr Who television series.
|
#75
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
for example the universe is defined as a four dimensional manifold
i laughed a lot about this in the science forum and compared it with the emeperors new clothes who could understand this
__________________
3gb ram ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2 I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The math requires more than 3 dimensions. If you are not fluent in scientific math-speak you cannot expect to understand the science. The most you will be able to do is watch Discovery channel documentaries where journalists present pretty animated demonstrations of the science which if you are lucky get it maybe half right in a quaint Discovery channel sort of way. In science given a choice between commonsense and believing the mathematical formalism you must always believe the math no matter how weird the result. |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wiki says a manifold is a math abstraction that models a point to a local neighborhood to the nth. So,
one dimensional manifold –> point relative to a line or circle two dimensional manifold –> point relative to a plane or sphere three dimensional manifold –> point relative to a cube fourth dimensional manifold –>point relative to space-time The last one being the famous space-time continuum. This can be confirmed by watching lots of Star Trek. ![]() Going to nth, all day long we can do Fifth dimensional manifold –> point relative to space-time-thought Sixth dimensional manifold –> point relative to space-time-thought-RAAAID ![]() Sevnth dimensional manifold –> point relative to space-time-thought-RAAAID-etc... Then there’s the anti-matter piece. So, I suppose, if assuming that a “point” has mass only in the third dimension (i.e., 3d space at a particle level), you could then do an “inverse” manifold starting at the third dimension. So, Third anti-dimensional manifold –> an anti-matter cube. But I’m not really sure how the math guys figure in the matter verses anti-matter. I suppose the anti-matter piece could be part of the same set of infinity instead of a separate “anti-matter” set of infinity. But then again, infinity is probably infinity. So they probably just use one set of infinity to include both the anti-matter piece and the matter piece. So, instead of starting all over again from 1 to n, they probably just slap it in the set of n somewhere. So you could just stick an “anti” in front of it. So where 1<x<n, you would have something like n-x anti-dimensional manifold –> anti-space-anti-time-anti-thought-anti-RAAAID (oops!) ![]() And somehow CloD fits in nearby where you got your anti-spitfires that climb like 109’s and your anti-109s that climb like spitfires and CloD works like a charm on 32-bit XP and STEAM is dead as a door knob. ![]() |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So your little cartoon was meant to inspire us to think outside the box and contemplate a 4th dimension, apparently because everybody think s you are crazy for thinking about a 4th dimension, yet science already has a theory on a 4th dimension and is in fact a familiar concept to most of us, but you are going to solve the mysteries of the 4th dimension by going crosseyed alot in your bedroom?
|
#79
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
well we know theres a 4th dimension but we dont have a perception of it
im TRYING to get the perception of it edit: the problem, your normal: you dont see auras as me , i know theres something spiritual, i have proof of it by seeing auras youre a bad observer: if you were a good observer like me you would have noticed that 3d movies is an AUGMENTED REALITY you dont see like that in real life put a pencil in your nose and look at it do you see it like in a 3d movie? nope you see an X if you dont even notice your perception in a 3d movie is different to real life dont you think you have some face by calling me crazy or stupid for noticing? do you really think im the only one doing almost imposible things like cutting flying flys in half with a blade or knowing what kind of thought you have by your aura? or slowing time as to be able to scratch brand new polished tin with my nail or get a 30 kill per one death playing counterstrike online... check this out and yeah delude yourself thinking its photoshopped you see you ignore this litle details into the construction of your reality I DONT if you really think youll find out THE LIE IS HUGE and people is too gullible
__________________
3gb ram ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2 I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL Last edited by raaaid; 04-20-2012 at 09:57 AM. |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
By going crosseyed?
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|