Head Tracking with Cliffs of Dover

[Wolf_Rider]

too bad you mised it on day one, eh?

and you never did explain, in layman's terms, how the interfacing works in ArmAII did you, LoBi...

[sigur_ros]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

response to Lobi ...

" Or perhaps you'd like to make some money out of your efforts - I understand you don't.

See, people who want to earn money from their work tend to respect others who try to do the same - this is why companies respect NP's property.

Thread closed. "

So you defend Natuarlpoint stopping clean alternative interface . What happend to consensus?!?!

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

the alternatives developers have every opportunity to present a clean alternative to developers in seeking inclusion. A consensus was reached very early in the thread on games should be available to alternative headtracking

If you meant those words you would not jump automatically to defend Naturalpoint like always.

[adonys]

There you go, a direct link to a post of a developer stating another communication interface implementation was stopped at the express request of TrackIR. Which also implies that is might be a current policy of NP to ask simulation developers to only implement TIR interface into the engine.

THAT can be used to sue NP for unfair business competition.

[Wolf_Rider]

Originally Posted by sigur_ros

So you defend Natuarlpoint stopping clean alternative interface . What happend to consensus?!?!

"the alternatives developers have every opportunity to present a clean alternative to developers in seeking inclusion. A consensus was reached very early in the thread on games should be available to alternative headtracking"

... yes, I do mean those words

Originally Posted by adonys

There you go, a direct link to a post of a developer stating another communication interface implementation was stopped at the express request of TrackIR. Which also implies that is might be a current policy of NP to ask simulation developers to only implement TIR interface into the engine.

THAT can be used to sue NP for unfair business competition.

the thing about that is there has been a loud noise made about that and no actual proof...

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

too bad you mised it on day one, eh?

and you never did explain, in layman's terms, how the interfacing works in ArmAII did you, LoBi...

I explain in layman's terms how FreeTrackClient.dll route works, sorry if you can't understand.

Someone can try explain to W-R in totally moron terms.

[Wolf_Rider]

no you haven't

[robtek]

Originally Posted by adonys

There you go, a direct link to a post of a developer stating another communication interface implementation was stopped at the express request of TrackIR. Which also implies that is might be a current policy of NP to ask simulation developers to only implement TIR interface into the engine.

THAT can be used to sue NP for unfair business competition.

iirc that was at the time when the alternative still included NP software.
The alternative changed that later in this form that then the, not prosecutable, user had to violate the copyright to gain access to titles without freetrack.dll.

[adonys]

bla-blaing around that FACT is only what it is: mindless mumbling. if that statement is true, and was made by a developer, then, I repeat, NP can be sued by anyone having interest in using a WR interface with that product, on the basis of unfair competition, no matter how many bla-blas will you throw in here on NP's behalf to cover it. just ask any lawyer you want for confirmation about this.

[robtek]

adonys, you have to quit on that selective reading.
I wrote: "iirc that was at the time when the alternative still included NP software."
FT was forced to remove the NP Software from its bundle. FACT
The only one who has difficulties understand short sentences and therefore is blah-blahing seems to be you.

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

no you haven't

Yes I have. If you are so stupid that can't understand, isn't my fault.

Everybody with a functional brain understood how FreeTrackClient.dll can provide HT data to any aplication.

You still stuck with "mouse look" and "hack". You even can't understand that. Sorry if you are that stupid, I can't do anything about that.