DX9 / XP discussion

[csThor]

Because it's listed in the requirements? When they released the game with DX9 they created a fait accompli that now forces them to support it.

[il_corleone]

yes its they task, but , they can send us a update only for DX10/11, so they can continue to invest in DX9, and, when its complete, they can use our logs for the patch and mixit it whit te global patch for dx9 or something..

[SiThSpAwN]

Originally Posted by il_corleone

yes its they task, but , they can send us a update only for DX10/11, so they can continue to invest in DX9, and, when its complete, they can use our logs for the patch and mixit it whit te global patch for dx9 or something..

Obviously not as we are waiting on the patch still.

[csThor]

Originally Posted by catito14

Also they promised a game who worked fine isn't it?
Well ... it seems that they used an "smoke curtain" using the DX9 matter as excuse because they can´t complete something potable to release in this week .... and seems that a lot of people "bought" this smoke ....
The last "alpha" patch was released than over a month ago ... and they come with this now? So much time needed to move from Alpha to Beta? .... vapooooooor again.

[_YoYo_]

Originally Posted by BlackSix

Evening gentlemen,

[FONT=Verdana]A very short update today....

Thx B6 for this update again but....

How many times we will hear "soon" or "very soon"? Very soon it means for me in Sunday or Saturday, not more than next Friday.
For me this news from Today isnt very good for Us, fans of the new IL-2. Still no patch, no details ect.
DX9?
Why? How many users here has a signature with Windows XP and old g.cards? 5-10%? You wrote to us - we are "near ready" but we work on DX9. So 90% of CoD users must wait for small part of users of XP or its a only reason to put again "we work on..." and "very soon..".

If id like to have simulator with support of DX9 I can take shortcut of IL-2 1946 from my desktop and no problem with my nerves, bugs ect.

Sorry for this, but the last OFFICIAL patch was in OCTOBER 2011. Till now not any official update. Its a wrong way. Please show us progress of Your TEAM. Give us this next alpha/beta/charlie patch + official patch and work on DX9 till the end of the Year for 5-10% users of CoD, no problem with this.
You have 350 small bugs in Bugtracker. Just one its support DX9...
Wrong way for me.

In the first way we need:
1/better AI
2/FM/CEM/Avionics (improve as in bugtracker)
3/clouds like before alpha 1.06 but with good fps (molecular problem)
4/smokes with good fps (molecular problem)
5/less stuttering near the ground (like in alpha 1.06 + better)
6-349/.... bugs from 2bugtracker.com/projects/cod
350/ DX9.

I hope the next update give to us next beta patch and in one month we will have officiall Steam patch. In October will be One Year from the last update.

Please change Your priority and I hope this "very soon" means less than:



Have a good weekend too!

[SiThSpAwN]

Originally Posted by _YoYo_

DX9?
Why?

[BlackSix]

Originally Posted by _YoYo_

DX9?
Why?

[SiThSpAwN]

Originally Posted by BlackSix

Their may be a language barrier, but the face palm is universal

[Buzpilot]

The Dx9 support, will it be mandatory for upgrades beyond IL-2 CoD too?

[Volksieg]

Originally Posted by Buzpilot

The Dx9 support, will it be mandatory for upgrades beyond IL-2 CoD too?

I'd suggest it would as it would be on the same engine... I'm just hoping and praying to every single one of the gods that this DX9 issue is actually fixed, and therefore not an issue, before any later additions are released. The team have promised to fix this game before releasing anything else in the series so.... let's hope they stick to that. lol