Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-06-2012, 11:02 AM
jf1981 jf1981 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 334
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IvanK View Post
"I've also learned that it should'nt be the case [...] Unless you are really interested in best fuel consumption then Auto Rich is all you should really need.
I am indeed. When we do fly some historical battels, most of us are falling down due to lack of fuel or lack of lifting surfaces generally.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-06-2012, 10:59 AM
jf1981 jf1981 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 334
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sutts View Post
Yes, doesn't sound like you were abusing the engine. Perhaps the cooling model is at fault and the engine is simply running hotter than it would in reality at the climb power setting. In the game it only seems to take a few seconds of over temp to screw the engine up.

Perhaps next time you try it you could watch the oil and water temps carefully and record any excessive temps that occur during the climb. A recorded track would be even better.

Cheers
I really think the real aircraft handles its nominal climb boost and revs up to the top, that is 2850 rpm 6 1/4 boost up to 30'000 ft, and we're still far from that.

Should be cross checked, but in my mind, it should handle that.

But I really think that's side effects from inadvertant engine and flight model changes. They are not documented anywhere that I know and one has to try to see what is working and what is not.
I used to read the historical manual, but what you find does'nt essentially apply to CoD.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-05-2012, 11:39 PM
FS~Phat FS~Phat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 609
Default

Boost and maybe mixture settings may be the culprit.
I havent flown the Hurri in the latest patch but the spit requires careful attention to RPM, Boost, Mixture and Prop Pitch to manage RPM/Boost, or it will fail after about 10mins of abuse.

In particular I now have to manage mixture which I havent had to do before the patch. The Hurri maybe different but just something to consider.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-05-2012, 11:42 PM
jf1981 jf1981 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 334
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FS~Phat View Post
Boost and maybe mixture settings may be the culprit.
I havent flown the Hurri in the latest patch but the spit requires careful attention to RPM, Boost, Mixture and Prop Pitch to manage RPM/Boost, or it will fail after about 10mins of abuse.

In particular I now have to manage mixture which I havent had to do before the patch. The Hurri maybe different but just something to consider.
Yes, to be considered.
If it's modelled right, mixtures pulled back is rich, then it shall be ok. And when pushing away, the engine's rough under many conditions.

I've also learned that it should'nt be the case since they are normally auto rich and auto lean so lean shall work better in theory.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-06-2012, 07:59 AM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

In the patch notes it was said that the boost gauges aren't displaying the correct values.
Maybe you overboosted without realizing it.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-06-2012, 10:51 AM
jf1981 jf1981 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 334
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robtek View Post
In the patch notes it was said that the boost gauges aren't displaying the correct values.
Maybe you overboosted without realizing it.
Yes but apparently ok on Hurricane, anyway the boost is part of a factory setting and I don't think one can over boost unles using the boost cutout.

Up to 6 1/4 (6,25) it's the rated (the gate). Should be allowed continuously except that it may impact on the engine's lifetime, thought I don't think it should fail during the flight really.
That is at < 2850 rpm.

Nevertheless I usually fly at lower rpm. Surely enough speed and rad fully opened + temeprature checks should be done, but when I failed the engine, I do not recall it was too warm.

Last edited by jf1981; 08-06-2012 at 11:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-25-2012, 03:27 PM
jf1981 jf1981 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 334
Default

Hi,

No idea when a patch could be available yet ? It's long wait.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-26-2012, 09:28 AM
jf1981 jf1981 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 334
Default

From now on, we are planning campaigns, some informations on patch would be welcome to the least.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-26-2012, 10:08 AM
FS~Phat FS~Phat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 609
Default

Just to clear up for you guys, Blacksix has made it pretty clear that there is still work to be done on catching bugs in the new graphics engine as the first priority.
From this one can deduce that it may be some time before we get the next official patch as they want the next patch to fix 99% of the new engine issues before turning to focus on the last remaining CLOD gameplay issues. This means catching as many beta bugs now as possible.

The Following is also still confirmed as being worked on; (in no particular order)
1. FM is constantly being tweaked.
2. clouds: shadows and self-shadows, reflection on water, source light influences
3. Radio Comms
4. AI
5. AA
6. Skin weathering

No guarantee that these will all be perfected until perhaps the sequel but they are currently being worked on.

These are currently the facts. Any more wild speculations and harassment of B6 or the devs will not be tolerated. This goes for both sides of the camps that like to argue. Any overstated comments trolling, whether being on the supporters or detractors side, will be deleted with no further warnings.

You guys that make broad sweeping and unfounded statements about the future of the game are not appreciated.

B6 will providing further information on Monday as stated in the community thread.

The thread will be locked if you can't be respectful and truthful.

Last edited by FS~Phat; 08-26-2012 at 11:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-26-2012, 09:24 PM
jf1981 jf1981 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 334
Default

Hi

I'm sorry if this thread was becoming wild that it 's been necessary to clean up, but frankly speaking, it's the first time such long time has passed from the issue and the cleanup of a software.

It's not yet, as I use to say, to a state where it should have been released 'clean'. Surely enough nowaday such complex sims take some weeks or months to get stable.

I'm personally wondering if there is really an interest in working out Cliffs of Dover. I mean thanks for the sequel, but we're waiting for the first opus to be clear and clean, we're barely flying as possible online, but it's far from the interest it's got to have.

Is there an interest from development to make a step ? Just wondering. Has'nt been very much clear yet.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.