Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-07-2011, 08:40 AM
No1 Cheese's Avatar
No1 Cheese No1 Cheese is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 292
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sauf View Post
I undertand your thinking, but some other countries had been fighting the war for 2 years before America was involved, are we just to ignore that? TBH I couldnt give a flying f*#k if the pacific is ignored, apparently we aussies did stuff all there anyway! MacArthur was a turd and Blamey was his dung beetle and us Aussies suffered for it. Give me the Med anytime, pity Australia hasn't got the whining power of the USA.
Brilliant
I love the Aussies,fantastic bunch and bloody hard aswell.I had the chance of serving with a few and they was as good as i had always believed them to be!!!

HERE HERE

BoB is the perfect starting point as said the future releases will have us waiting in hopefully the right order.

Cheers

Cheese
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-07-2011, 01:06 PM
usr usr is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 13
Default

And do not forget the total lack of ground war in BoB. Perfect excuse to focus on the airborne side of things (seems to be hard enough) and not yet have a detailed dynamic campaign, elaborate ground AI and so on in the initial release.

That being said, the ironic side of me would not be fully surprised if finished, perfect ground war code for IL2-style close support missions would be sleeping inside CoD, just the kind of prioritisation mistake that would be totally 1C/MG-style
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-07-2011, 03:20 PM
Rattlehead Rattlehead is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 727
Default

Personally I'm up for it all.
North Africa for me is number one, but I'd be more than happy with whatever theatre is next.*
In the original Il-2, I loved Pacific Fighters, I loved the eastern front. I loved all of it, really.
Bring it on...

*With the possible exception of Korea. Not that I don't want to play Korea or fight in the Mig 15 or F-86, but it would seem strange going from BoB to many years forward and a totally different environment with totally different aircraft, and then later on back to WW2 for a stint in the Pacific or Russia.
In my opinion, it would totally break the 'flow' of the series.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-06-2011, 10:15 PM
proton45's Avatar
proton45 proton45 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 651
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vengeanze View Post
I know alot of americans that do not plan to transit to CloD but stay in the pacific.

I remember when IL-2 came out. We who played CFS2 back then hadn't seen anything like it and we made the transition cause it was such a great sim even though it was russian front.
When PF was released with carriers, that made it for the americans.

Unless we see some american planes in an addon (with maybe carriers in the med) then I think the sales in the US will be fair.
I don't know of a lot of a American players who are primarily driven by feelings of nationalism...most "American" flight combat enthusiasts I know of, are driven by a sense of history (for a lack of a better label), and are interested in all the theaters of war. For the most part we are fascinated in the development of air combat technology and how the tactics of air combat have changed over time. Most American enthusiasts I know of are interested in all of the air combat "ACES", regardless of the nationality.

Here in the "States", we have a thing called the "internet"...we also have a thing called "cable television". These newfangled "high tech gizmo's" allow even the most isolated American to be exposed to all the various theaters of combat.

I think that most people here would agree that the modern air combat enthusiast, identifies with the pilots (aces) personal experiences, and are not interested in the politics or national identity of the aces. I think that this would apply to air combat enthusiasts from around the world....regardless of where are computers are plugged in.


P.S. I think that the "ME109 vs. The Spitfire", is as good as anywhere to start the new series....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-06-2011, 10:36 PM
Vengeanze Vengeanze is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 837
Default

I'm not american and I totally agree that if your interest is with ww2 aircombat then CloD is a gem!!
On the other hand take a hockey fan from US that lives and breethes hockey. You would think that he preferred NHL before KHL.

Also, from a more objective pov many western products aim at the american audience to ensure sales.
Another example: How come all brittish popstars wanna break in the US? Sales and worldfame!

In short, if 1C wants BIG revenue then they'll look to please american consumers. The european betatesting is a part of this. An addon with US planes (P-51 for sure) is prolly next.

Just saying...! Hope I'm wrong but they voted for Bush two times so...!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-06-2011, 11:45 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

at least for virtual bomberpilots, yes, we exist , such ealry war scenarios (and the BoB is one) are much better.....the fighters are not these superhard hitting speedmonsters they become in later scenarios
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-07-2011, 05:07 AM
machoo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I like the Pacific theatre better , so much more brutal.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-07-2011, 08:28 AM
addman's Avatar
addman addman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vasa, Finland
Posts: 1,593
Default

I don't care which the current scenario is as long as the next one is Korea .
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-07-2011, 01:20 PM
Pbs Pbs is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 18
Default

Hate BOB. Hate machinguns. Want planes with BIG CANNONS, like Ki-84 from Pacific war or BF-109G(K) or La-5(7) from East front.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-07-2011, 07:25 PM
Kongo-Otto's Avatar
Kongo-Otto Kongo-Otto is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Augsburg, Germany
Posts: 391
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pbs View Post
Hate BOB. Hate machinguns. Want planes with BIG CANNONS, like Ki-84 from Pacific war or BF-109G(K) or La-5(7) from East front.
Hmmm something to compensate or just lousy aiming skills?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.