Freetrack interface use in IL-2:CoD

[julian265]

I'd prefer access to the six head control axes (like DCS:A-10C gives), rather than anything 'special' for FT. No vote from me.

[Wolf_Rider]

Swiss is right, there is no "don't care option". There aren't any options for any other tracker though, only a single selection.

poll could have used more thought

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

Swiss is right, there is no "don't care option". There aren't any options for any other tracker though, only a single selection.

poll could have used more thought

And because of that, you voted no.

Please, do a favor to yourself and get a life. This poll is just about FT interface. I like to see FT interface, TIR interface, direct acess to axes... And I'm not a moron that will vote "no" even in one TIR interface poll.

Some people here are pathetic, sorry to say.

[Wolf_Rider]

Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM

I like to see FT interface, TIR interface, direct acess to axes...

that would have been better to put up a poll around, eh

something like:
headtracker access through hacks?
headtracker access without hacks?
don't care either way?

[swiss]

Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM

And because of that, you voted no.

Please, do a favor to yourself and get a life. This poll is just about FT interface. I like to see FT interface, TIR interface, direct acess to axes... And I'm not a moron that will vote "no" even in one TIR interface poll.

Some people here are pathetic, sorry to say.

You should find yourself a job in marketing, maybe as a specialist for surveys.
It's funny you actually try to force the result you seek for.


Just in case there was a misunderstanding, let me present an example:
Basis: 100 people

- 30 of them want FT included (for whatever reason)
- 10 don't (see above)
- 60 don't care

Now you got scientific proof the majority doesn't care / doesn't want it to be included.
But this result wouldn't serve your purpose, instead you prefer to just cut out the "30 vs 10" to proof your point.
How cunning!

[MadBlaster]

Originally Posted by swiss

You should find yourself a job in marketing, maybe as a specialist for surveys.
It's funny you actually try to force the result you seek for.


Just in case there was a misunderstanding, let me present an example:
Basis: 100 people

- 30 of them want FT included (for whatever reason)
- 10 don't (see above)
- 60 don't care

Now you got scientific proof the majority doesn't care / doesn't want it to be included.
But this result wouldn't serve your purpose, instead you prefer to just cut out the "30 vs 10" to proof your point.
How cunning!

Your forgeting the other side of the ledger there buddy. Actually, 90 people want it or don't care and only 10 sad sacks don't. Clearly a larger majority than you first thought! But it is your example.

[ElAurens]

An old axiom:

Figures lie and liars figure.

Personally I don't care.

Far more important things to worry about, but you gents please continue your slagging match as it is a wonderful way to boost post counts.


+1

[Wolf_Rider]

Originally Posted by MadBlaster

Actually, 90 people want it or don't care and only 10 sad sacks don't. Clearly a larger majority than you first thought! But it is your example.

its a rigged poll Blaster, which proves the last two points made

[zakkandrachoff]

info

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FreeTrack

[MadBlaster]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FreeTrack

Solidarity brother!!!