Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-25-2019, 05:52 PM
Marabekm Marabekm is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 243
Default

Updates to some aircraft armaments

P-400
One 500 pound bomb
Two 100 pound bombs

PBY/PBN
Torpedoes

SBD3/5
One 500 pound bomb and two 100 pound bombs

B5N2
One 800 kg bomb
Two 250 Kg bombs
One 250 kg bomb and six 60 kg bombs
Six 60 kg bombs

D3A1
Two 60 kg bombs (wings only)

G4M1
one 250 kg bomb and six 60 kg bombs

Last edited by Marabekm; 12-25-2019 at 07:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-01-2020, 07:47 AM
taly001 taly001 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 61
Default

From testing some planes in 4.13.4 (still scared 4.14 will blow up my PC )

Bf109G-6/AS and Bf109G-10 seem to have swapped engines
The gauge engine pressures of the 109G-10 seem to be of DB605AS and low alt speed = 109G-6 and has great 9000m pressure ala 605AS.
The 109G-6/AS has pressures similar to 109K (DB605D), and poorer 9000m pressure than AS.

The Zero A6M5c 52c and A6M7 62 says they have Water-Injection, but this was certainly not standard for these models. Other wise performance is about right.

The A6M7 63 (assume it is a il2:1946 hot plane) could have water injection but does not. Boost should also be slightly upped to simulate water injection power effect? or some other way? for 250-300mm.

Weights of A6M5c, A6M7's probably too light.

Ki-43-II kai tests with identical climb, top speed and acceleration as K-43-II, it should have ~30hp base hp added.

Ki-43-I flying weight is too light by 200kg. Many data repeats over-light values of early Ki-43-I without full war equipment.

P40E is incorrectly faster at 6000m than P40M!

Ki84 shows 600mm boost on gauge! 500mm was actual max. boost.

Would be happy to work with TD to fix these
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-01-2020, 09:09 PM
Torsteven Torsteven is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marabekm View Post
Updates to some aircraft armaments
+1 It would be great !
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marabekm View Post
SBD3/5
One 500 pound bomb and two 100 pound bombs
SBD-3

SBD-5


Quote:
Originally Posted by Marabekm View Post
B5N2
One 800 kg bomb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marabekm View Post
Two 250 Kg bombs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marabekm View Post
One 250 kg bomb and six 60 kg bombs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marabekm View Post
Six 60 kg bombs


I have a pretty long list (with photo evidence) for new loadouts ! For example :

P-400
One 100-pound bomb


P-400
One 250-pound bomb


P-47
Fragmentation bombs
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-04-2020, 09:11 AM
Marabekm Marabekm is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 243
Default



I like the pictures. Don't know where you got them but very nice!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-02-2020, 01:18 AM
JacksonsGhost JacksonsGhost is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 188
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marabekm View Post
Updates to some aircraft armaments

P-400
One 500 pound bomb
Two 100 pound bombs
+1 more to fix this and other P-39 versions with the US 500lb bomb fit. As documented in a previous thread, the P-400 was used by the USAAF with bombs at Guadalcanal. And the P-39N-1s and Q-1s were used by the USAAF on many strike missions in Italy, but currently we only have the very different looking Russian bombs as an option for those types. Considering that the P-39D models already have the US 500lb bomb option this would appear to be a relatively easy fix.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-02-2020, 09:55 AM
Sita Sita is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 943
Default

agree ... it's look interesting)
__________________
work hard, fly fast

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-02-2020, 11:16 AM
Torsteven Torsteven is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sita View Post
agree ... it's look interesting)
Nice !

For P-39Q
One 500-pound bomb


P-39Q
75-gal droptank
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.