Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-23-2015, 07:03 PM
majorfailure majorfailure is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ice_Eagle View Post
The damage models on the 190's were bone stock. With Wgr.21 attached I can break, or something breaks the wing. Without Wgr.21 attached I cannot break the wing. I killed the pilot, engine, rudder, fin, elevators, ailerons, landing gear, but the wings remained intact. So Pursuivant is on to something here.
Can you break the wings when there are 50kg bombs attached? Wings on weaker planes are breakable by only the force gravity and mass of attachments generate. Extremely easy to do with Hs129, if done well you can lose both wings simultaneously. So maybe the wings of Fw190 are weakened under fire to a point where they can no longer support the additional load of attachment under the gravitational pull?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-24-2015, 05:01 AM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by majorfailure View Post
Can you break the wings when there are 50kg bombs attached? Wings on weaker planes are breakable by only the force gravity and mass of attachments generate.
I don't think that parts can be broken by gravity alone - at least when I'm shooting at static models.

IL2 doesn't model the sort of sagging or bending you'd see if the airframe was failing due to gravity. Instead, broken parts often fly off stationary (flyable) aircraft in extremely unrealistic fashion.

But, the idea that wings might break under the strain of ordinance on their wings might have merit.

On the ground, I've seen no evidence that ordinance mounted on wing hardpoints affects wing breakage. But, what might be going on is that the game models increased wind resistance due to external ordinance and that combines with other damage effects to break wings. Sort of a combination of my guess and your guess.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-24-2015, 10:35 PM
RPS69 RPS69 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 364
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pursuivant View Post
I don't think that parts can be broken by gravity alone - at least when I'm shooting at static models.

But, the idea that wings might break under the strain of ordinance on their wings might have merit.
Actually, if you take a very step dive and climb with heavy ordenance on your plane, your wings will fall of. This is so since 4.10 or 4.11. (Don't remember well since when this started).

You can't reproduce that while on ground.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-26-2015, 04:40 PM
majorfailure majorfailure is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RPS69 View Post
Actually, if you take a very step dive and climb with heavy ordenance on your plane, your wings will fall of. This is so since 4.10 or 4.11. (Don't remember well since when this started).

You can't reproduce that while on ground.
Yes, I remember, before the patch I used to do steep bombing attacks with external loads attached in an A-20. A few and some more A-20 were lost due to catastrophic wing fractures before I learned to either not carry external loads, or to remember them.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-27-2015, 06:07 PM
KG26_Alpha KG26_Alpha is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,805
Default

A20 = classic wing breaker.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-28-2015, 02:00 AM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KG26_Alpha View Post
A20 = classic wing breaker.
Makes sense. Although the A-20 handled like a fighter in many ways, it was not fully aerobatic. All the training materials warn pilots of this fact.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-28-2015, 08:21 AM
falconilia falconilia is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 13
Default

Good morning Guys.
Right now my free time is limited so i dont have time to respond often.
So ill try to set my opinion in few lines.

Im sure 0.50s cant destroy FWs wing as P47s or P40s as you said.
But im focus to FW because i dont meet Allied planes as enemies on single games or on net.Also in RL was impossible as well.
I think i cant brake KI61s wing BUT i can destroy it in other ways as it has it weakneses as most planes.
For example.When i shoot BF109 i will destroy his engine or wing -ME110:engines -A6m:wing fuel or engine - KI43:wing - KI61:engine -D9:engine - KI84 engine or fuel tank - N1K:engine or wings(hard but duable) - KI100:engine..........FW190a: ??????(luck?)

Witch engine is more durable? P47s,F6fs or FWs?try to shoot a P47 and you will see its engine burning like hell.

Finaly my conclusion about wing damage is that the trigger set about wing brake is broken or off.
Minor damage :1-10 bullets
Moderate damage:11-25 bullets
Heavy Damage :26-unlimited bullets
(Number of bullets are just a guess not true)

Pursuivant id like to thank you for your time and all the test you made and will do!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.