Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

View Poll Results: Do you prefer graphical aspect of ROF or COD one's ?
ROF 26 18.71%
COD 113 81.29%
Voters: 139. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-02-2013, 11:13 AM
=CfC= Father Ted =CfC= Father Ted is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 61
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zapatista View Post
lets see, compared to CoD, the RoF-ww2 reskinned game[/B]
- wont have the level of cockpit detail
- wont have the same detailed plane damage models
- wont have the same complex engine and aircraft system modeling
- wont have the same realistic advanced flight models (which has been THE great strength of the il2 series and has built its reputation)
- wont have anywhere near the same amount of flyable aircraft
- wont be able to have the same high aircraft count in the air, either human flown or combined with AI
- wont be able to handle 100 players on a online server with additional high counts of AI planes at the same time
- wont have anywhere near the same amount of static ground objects (buildings etc)
- wont have anywhere near the same high amount of ground AI activity and active ground objects, be this moving collums of vehicles, trucks/tanks, AA batteries or civilian traffic
- ...... and the list goes on and on.............
Where your logic fails is that for a lot of people who bought the game, CoD had none of those things either, because it wouldn't run properly. It's pointless to hark on about RoF/WW2 hybrid as a backward step, when there were never any forward steps. Sure, 1C wanted to make this amazing, complicated, beautiful sim, but in reality they didn't.
  #2  
Old 01-02-2013, 11:56 AM
Skoshi Tiger Skoshi Tiger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by =CfC= Father Ted View Post
Where your logic fails is that for a lot of people who bought the game, CoD had none of those things either, because it wouldn't run properly. It's pointless to hark on about RoF/WW2 hybrid as a backward step, when there were never any forward steps. Sure, 1C wanted to make this amazing, complicated, beautiful sim, but in reality they didn't.
But then there are people like me who's only issue I had with the COD was the constant whining when I visited the forum! ( some things NEVER change ) Like all sims (Including ROF - can you remember what it was like before their performance patches????) it had issues that for the most part were solved by the developers.

There seams to be a lot of ROF fans who will buy BoS even if it is ROF with the minimum amount of development to get a WWII theater going. Good on them I am glad that they are enjoying their sim.

I would class myself as one of the people who would have bought the IL2 Sequel even if it was just the CoD engine with the minimum ammount of development to get the theatre working. I enjoy COD that much.

For me 1CGS will have to put in a reasonable amount of effort into their development to make a worthy successor for the Il2 series.

The ground war in particular will need a lot of attention.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.