|
|
|
|
#1
12-12-2012, 07:58 AM
|
|||
|
|||
S!
Can live without clickable cockpit if everything else is done well. 
|
|
#2
12-12-2012, 08:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
For my taste I really prefer the ROF community to this one: those players are focused on the application's real target: being a WW1 combat simulator.
I'm always been against clickable cockpits: it's good for FSX, is not for a combat sim... Even if it's a toggleable feature, as you can still manage the plane by keys, it's a loss of time and resources on something that's it's not really important. Like the 3d modelling of cows, sheeps and chessboards. Now 777 is taking the big part in this new project: it's like a dream to me.
__________________
 A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. Last edited by 6S.Manu; 12-12-2012 at 08:53 AM.
|
|
#5
12-12-2012, 11:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
12-12-2012, 11:39 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Clickable cockpit is a bunus, but live without this.
But please do animated cockpit swichs and levers, that react to keyboard/joystick commands, like in some IL-2 1946 planes. Things like static brake lever, trim tabs... in CloD Spit/Hurris is disappointing. Sokol1 Last edited by Sokol1; 12-12-2012 at 04:50 PM.
|
|
#7
12-12-2012, 11:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It's like: we make a step to be less arcada (IL-2 1946) and more simer (Clod), then we get another step backwards to be more arcada (BoS). I just love to see how people like to be blind folded with the future game. RoF is such a limited game compared with our current CloD.
|
|
#8
12-12-2012, 12:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And yet, Clod is dead............. so now what? Gonna play BoB for ever? HAve fun with that.
|
|
#9
12-12-2012, 12:56 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
As long as we don't have some kind of touch based screen type standardized, click-able cockpits in a combat sim is something of a fun "extra". It's fun to poke around with but impractical as *curseword*. Maybe some of you (self-masochists?) take enjoyment in trying to control stuff like radiators and control-surfaces with the mouse, mid-combat. I, personally prefer to just slew those things to the HOTAS/joystick. In conclusion, it's a fun feature but far from game-breaking. There are more important stuff that makes up a good combat sim, co-ops for example....hrrrm.
 P.S It's things like click-able cockpits that was partly to blame for the failure of CloD, the team was too ambitious -yes they were- and tried to do EVERYTHING but that led to many half-finished or half-hearted features. I hope too see more of a focused approach on the new IL-2 title(s).
__________________
Last edited by addman; 12-12-2012 at 12:59 PM.
|
|
#10
12-12-2012, 12:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
CloD's ideas weren't bad, but it was incomplete and badly developed: those ideas and some solutions can be reproduced in the 777's engine.
__________________
A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. Last edited by 6S.Manu; 12-12-2012 at 12:18 PM.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
