Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-11-2012, 10:39 PM
joker68 joker68 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 18
Default

As an old ROF player, I'm glad that 777 took over the development. Not only I think that ROF engine is far superior to simulating aircraft behavior than CLOD's, I also believe that 777 Studios has what is needed to put out an outstanding sim, a truly "better IL2".

I feel ripped for the money invested in CLOD. It never worked, and I was also skeptical about the sequel (BOM) that would "correct it". Time to move on: remove CLOD from hdd, and wait for a brand new WW2 sim.
Well, since ROF launched, I haven't really played WW2 sims anymore. Now I can go back.

Way to go, 777!!
Cya on http://forum.il2sturmovik.net
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-12-2012, 05:09 AM
Slipstream2012 Slipstream2012 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Coventry, England
Posts: 92
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joker68 View Post
As an old ROF player, I'm glad that 777 took over the development. Not only I think that ROF engine is far superior to simulating aircraft behavior than CLOD's, I also believe that 777 Studios has what is needed to put out an outstanding sim, a truly "better IL2".
Haha, you got your right name at-least, but that's about all.
ROF's engine does what it has to and fairly well, Clods engine can manage everything it has to simulation wise, plus it can be used for many many other things, like moving a great number of objects (tanks, infantry etc) around the virtual battlefield in real time. But thats only the tip of the iceberg.

The truth of the matter is, that the average simmer has never seen, or explored the vast variety of things that can be achieved with the scripting engine in Clod and never will, they just look at the things like the unfinished damage modelling, AA, and TAB menu for AI aircraft or try to run every setting maxed with a mid range system, 1000+ objects, or with a ton of unneeded processes in the background.

As for the aircraft, have you ever noticed how the electrical/fuels systems are modeled, or the light dynamically shines from cracks in the perspex when its been hit?

Quote:
Originally Posted by joker68 View Post
I feel ripped for the money invested in CLOD. It never worked, and I was also skeptical about the sequel (BOM) that would "correct it". Time to move on: remove CLOD from hdd, and wait for a brand new WW2 sim.
Well, since ROF launched, I haven't really played WW2 sims anymore. Now I can go back.
Do you feel ripped when you go out and blow around the amount of cash that you spent on Clod drinking beer? Just to piss it all down the toilet, then wake up in the morning with a cracking headache & feeling like a heap of crap?
Sure it ran damn crappy for most of us & had problems when it was first released but it improved and now its very playable.

I have close to 1000 logged on it, most online, and I'm still running an AMD Athlon x2 215 dual core, clocking at 2.7, and a AMD 5850 with 4gb ram. All but the building settings are at "low" everything else is medium to high and I rarely get a stutter. I've had many hours on enjoyment out of it and continue to do so, needless to say, for all its flaws and all of its beauty, its not leaving my hdd anytime soon.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-12-2012, 12:21 PM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joker68 View Post
As an old ROF player, I'm glad that 777 took over the development. Not only I think that ROF engine is far superior to simulating aircraft behavior than CLOD's, I also believe that 777 Studios has what is needed to put out an outstanding sim, a truly "better IL2".

I feel ripped for the money invested in CLOD. It never worked, and I was also skeptical about the sequel (BOM) that would "correct it". Time to move on: remove CLOD from hdd, and wait for a brand new WW2 sim.
Well, since ROF launched, I haven't really played WW2 sims anymore. Now I can go back.

Way to go, 777!!
Cya on http://forum.il2sturmovik.net
Cheers
Can I remove it from my Steam game list too? My eyes are hurting evertime I read that name.
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-12-2012, 12:46 PM
adonys adonys is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 850
Default

can we have now the code? I'm sure we'll be able to fix by ourselves what your incompetence couldn't.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-13-2012, 03:04 PM
il_corleone's Avatar
il_corleone il_corleone is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 204
Default

the engine is far better than the rof one, whit the code and the modders, the bugs will last 1 month,and i dont talk what the moders can bring too later than that, and i have rof too, since 2010. so i know what i am talking about.
__________________
GTX560TI 2GB-I5 2500-4GB DDR3-488GB Western Digital WD5000AAKX-Win7 64-Bits

[IMG]http://www.rincondesimulacion.com/im...00x200warz.png[/IMG]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-14-2012, 04:50 AM
Lurker_71 Lurker_71 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 52
Default

CloD engine is worthless, which is why its owner threw it away. 777's getting involved in making a WW2 sim is the best thing that happened for the sim community for a long time. Shame on MG for blocking the genre's progress for so long. At least they are out of business, and deservedly so. Good days ahead.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-14-2012, 07:37 AM
Skoshi Tiger Skoshi Tiger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lurker_71 View Post
CloD engine is worthless, which is why its owner threw it away. 777's getting involved in making a WW2 sim is the best thing that happened for the sim community for a long time. Shame on MG for blocking the genre's progress for so long. At least they are out of business, and deservedly so. Good days ahead.
What do you mean worthless? On steam it is worth $49.95 or if you wait till it comes on special you can get it for $9 and change! At either price it's a Bargain!

WHat you probably meant is that we won't see any more development in this sim. Which is sad really coz at the moment it is without peers!

Cheers!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-27-2012, 07:57 PM
Stefem Stefem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 100
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lurker_71 View Post
CloD engine is worthless, which is why its owner threw it away. 777's getting involved in making a WW2 sim is the best thing that happened for the sim community for a long time. Shame on MG for blocking the genre's progress for so long. At least they are out of business, and deservedly so. Good days ahead.
Wow, just another expert on software development and, as he said "Shame on MG for blocking the genre's progress for so long" even on the sim genere...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-27-2012, 09:34 PM
jctrnacty jctrnacty is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 29
Default

Can anyone recommend Luthier to use kickstarter funding that could help him to get money to buy out the source code?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-01-2013, 09:30 AM
Lurker_71 Lurker_71 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 52
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stefem View Post
Wow, just another expert on software development and, as he said "Shame on MG for blocking the genre's progress for so long" even on the sim genere...
Alas! If only Luthier had access to you with your masterly skills and deep understanding of the software development process

And, if you're having trouble understanding what I mean by their "blocking the genre's progress," here is a tip: MG's presence in the WW2 sim segment with their formidable repute scared off potential competitors. Now that it is obvious MG was not up to the task, chances are we will be seeing several developers showing up to fill the void (777 being one obviously and perhaps Eagle Dynamics). And that is why I am and you too should be happy that MG is out of the way, that is if you're a WW2 sim fan. They wasted 6 years for the genre. That's how I see it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.