The so called "no-loss" concept (whole game) is wrong and stupid.

[Razorflame]

Originally Posted by gempepaine

You don't have to worry about no loss games anymore.
You know that first fight with Guilford ,when he cast armaggedon at the end of the battle ? Those troops are counted as casualties on the final score.
Was a little disappointed after 32 h of gameplay without losing a single troop.

should still be doable
like said above
level 5 with some extra+res
from skills and items

[Fatt_Shade]

No loss is almost always doable.

You don't have to worry about no loss games anymore.You know that first fight with Guilford ,when he cast armaggedon at the end of the battle ?

What are enemy controlling spells for ? Blind , sheep, fear, etc ... You disable his last troop and revive your army, then finish battle. End of story.

[Nirual]

Originally Posted by Fatt_Shade

What are enemy controlling spells for ? Blind , sheep, fear, etc ... You disable his last troop and revive your army, then finish battle. End of story.

Not in that instance, because the battle ends right after. Guilford gets to cast the spell after he has already lost technically.

[Xargon]

You can't prevent the damage from that armageddon, but I remember that he apparently was not very bright (it did pretty low damage, not sure how much exactly because I do not care about no-loss). So maybe even lvl4 creatures with high hp will not lose a unit? (and you can always cast stuff like peacefulness, ice prison, last hero, etc)