Quote:
Originally Posted by tintifaxl
If I was a fan of the SU-26 I'd already fly it in FSX. So my guess would be: none.
|
If you were a real fan of Su-26 and you try to fly it in FSX, you would run away after a few serious test, so its flight model is really HORRIBLE, USELESS FOR AEROBATICS.
Maybe you are unaware that most of the fans of aerobatics are already fliying in IL-2 series, because its flight model was good enough for a real training. Since a year ago, flight models in other simulators went better for aerobatics, but we still have no realistic Su-26 until now, when it appeared the CoD one and the Alabeo's one for X-Plane (not the one for FSX),
The only adversary for the Su-26 from CoD is the Alabeo's Su-26, but NOT the one for FSX, but the one for X-Plane 10 (which I have also pending to test).
Understood?
Attitudes like the ones I've been reading here are not proper from a real aviation lover, I've seen exactly the same when the guys of DCS delivered the Mustang... Jet virtual pilots did not like the Mustang.
This variety in simulator benefits the competitive developing from various developers, to deliver the best products, and at last, the first to get the benefits are we all. Wherever there are your favourite planes, you can fly them morea and more realistically as every new development is launched.
So please, can I ask for positive comments instead of depressive downspiral negative comments?
Thanks