Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-22-2012, 07:54 PM
X-Raptor X-Raptor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jermin View Post
If I were you, I would have shot down a few more than that.

I'm writing all these words not to complain the game is too difficult for me. Actually I am much better than you can imagine.

What I want is the most viable WW2 flight sim in the world to be more and more realistic, not the other way around.
I agree 100% with you and your opinion jermin about incorrect and uber FM of LA 5 -LA 7 Yak and LAGG Soviet Planes Ingame.
The problem is " only" that there are people who don't want to adjust the FM of this planes. And I add me at your whislist to see the corrrection of those uber FM soviet planes , it will give a new life at this flight sim.
I Hope someone at TD Team will hear us.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-24-2012, 12:45 PM
gaunt1 gaunt1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: India
Posts: 314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by X-Raptor View Post
I agree 100% with you and your opinion jermin about incorrect and uber FM of LA 5 -LA 7 Yak and LAGG Soviet Planes Ingame.
Well, the FM of all Lavochkins are really nonsense, but Yaks arent that bad, especially those with the VK-105. Yak-9T&K are overmodeled, true, but as far as I know the 1942 model Yak-9 and the Yak-9D have one of the most realistic FMs in the sim.

Quote:
Bear in mind that Russian engines are historically unreliable and easily overheating.
ASh-82 engines were quite reliable in La-5. But yes, some engines, like the VK-107 were terribly unreliable and overheated quickly even @ normal operation due to poor quality seals and bearings, and poorly constructed oil pumps. In addition to that, it was very risky to run them @ WEP, engine seizure could occur at any minute, if not any second. A while ago, I did a little test, I was flying a La-7 against a Yak-9U, I quickly scored a hit on its engine, which started to emit black smoke. The Yak flew more than 5 minutes without any signs of reduced performance (I didnt shot it down to test the endurance of its engine), and it caught fire about a further 5 minutes later.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-05-2012, 01:10 AM
1984 1984 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 152
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gaunt1 View Post
VK-107
again, special for you (at first time, about yak-9u... or you, maybe, start find and read self?) -

Quote:
С июня 1944 года на истребитель Як-9У на аэродроме Волосово начал переучиваться личный состав 139-го гвардейского 303-й иад. Об эксплуатации Як-9У с моторами BK-107A сохранилось очень мало информации, и, когда заходит речь о двигателе, то главным его дефектом называют низкий ресурс, до выработки которого в строевых частях они обычно не дотягивали. Одной из причин этого было плохое знание техническим персоналом материальной части и соответственно не грамотная его эксплуатация. Чтобы не быть голословным, отмечу, что в 139-м гвардейском иап моторы нарабатывали по 115 часов, вместо гарантированных 100 часов. Это стало возможным, благодаря упорному труду мотористов полка.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-05-2012, 12:39 PM
gaunt1 gaunt1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: India
Posts: 314
Default

Please write in english. Im sure not everybody understands russian here (like me). Google translate helps, but it is still quite bad.

About the VK-107, that report with 115 hours in the engine is a big lie. Average engine life was around 20-25 hours for the WW2 version (but only if the pilot didnt use WEP). Of course it was unacceptable, so after the war, some improvements were made, but it had little effect, engines rarely reached 40 hours. Post WW2 reports from Poland, Yugoslavia and Hungary indicate that these engines needed excessive amounts of maintenance, and still they were terribly unreliable, some of them developed engine seizure after only 10-15 hours without using WEP for even a minute! And these were the post-war updated engines.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-05-2012, 07:27 PM
Woke Up Dead Woke Up Dead is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 209
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gaunt1 View Post
Post WW2 reports from Poland...
You have a link to those Polish reports?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-05-2012, 10:07 PM
1984 1984 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 152
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gaunt1 View Post
Please write in english. Im sure not everybody understands russian here (like me). Google translate helps, but it is still quite bad.
i'm not translator of quotes on russian language...

if you mean my bad english... well... apart my "sorry" in many posts, i think, even perfect english not help you to understand what i'm write, and not help you to start read the right books before writing, if you really not want do all this...

just my long-standing observation...

Quote:
About the VK-107, that report with 115 hours in the engine is a big lie.
oh, again... and again, "stream of consciousness"... now like dude with "only 2 min forsazh" and with not russian compilations...

maybe, you want say your opinion for author, techs and pilots of GIAP personally?


and, you want to say something more about my last posts?

especially, about "mythical", "abnormal" and "hugely overmodelled" yak-3...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-06-2012, 01:47 PM
gaunt1 gaunt1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: India
Posts: 314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1984 View Post
if you mean my bad english... well... apart my "sorry" in many posts, i think, even perfect english not help you to understand what i'm write, and not help you to start read the right books before writing, if you really not want do all this...
No, I dont have problems with your english. The problem is that you quote lots from russian pages, and its hard to understand those with google translate.

Quote:
maybe, you want say your opinion for author, techs and pilots of GIAP personally?
Soviet reports from the fields were often quite exaggerated, mainly due to patriotism. And this "115 hours" is another example of this.

About flight performance data, I think TsAGI reports are the most authentic.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woke Up Dead View Post
You have a link to those Polish reports?
Unfortunately no, I read it in an old magazine.

But every source states that average engine life was only 25 hours for the WW2 version. Post war improvements extended the engine life by about 10 hours.
http://en.valka.cz/viewtopic.php/t/54647

Another interesting fact:
Quote:
...impossibility to use the "combat mode" (3200 rpm, the nominal mode was 3000 rpm) of the engine due to its unreliability.
http://mig3.sovietwarplanes.com/yak3...yak3vk107.html
You can read the same here too:
http://www.kamov.net/russian-aircraft/yakovlev-yak-9p/
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-24-2012, 08:55 PM
Woke Up Dead Woke Up Dead is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 209
Default

Those Uber LaGGs are Uber.

Please fix the historically important I-185 so the 109K can be flown in historically accurate long one-on-one engagements on the historically accurate open-pit all-planeset all-airstart RCAF server.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.