![]() |
|
|||||||
| FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Feel free to calculate it yourselves!!
Quote:
So it is everything to do with sustained turn time comparisions as it IS A SUSTAINED TURN TIME COMPARISION under the same condition of flight. At the same altitude and airspeed, that is how the relative performance will play out. You do understand the Spitfire and BF-109 do not achieve their best turn performance under the same conditions of flight?
__________________
Last edited by Crumpp; 09-17-2012 at 04:28 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
There is a wide range of data available on both types. Choose what you want.....
__________________
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Spitfire data used
http://www.spitfireperformance.com/n3171.html Bf-109E3 data used: http://kurfurst.org/Tactical_trials/...ls/Morgan.html
__________________
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
An obvious statement but the Spit trials you quote above seems to be without the extra boost that 100 octane allows.
A second observation, can someone explain how the Me109 is supposed to have a better manoverability at higher speeds than the SPitfire when all the tests point out how difficult the 109 is to manoever at high speeds due to the way the controls stiffen up at high speed compared to the Spitfire? Last I don't see how the chart on posting 129 page 13 proves what it says it proves. I would appreciate it if it could be explained to me in simple terms or explain the maths behind the criteria thanks Last edited by Glider; 09-17-2012 at 05:01 PM. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Do you know what would happen if you entered a pure turn and burn (TnB) fight against a Spitfire (you in a 109)?
__________________
Bobika. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|